HomeMy WebLinkAbout323871
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AGREEMENT NO.15-095
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered intothis J[0th_day of March ,2015,byand
between the COUNTY OF FRESNO,a Political Subdivision of the State of California,hereinafter
referred to as "COUNTY",and Interwest Consulting Group,Inc.whose address is 7491 N.
Remington Ave.,Suite 103,Fresno,CA 93711,hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS,the COUNTY has issued a Request for Proposal (RFP),attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A"for Building Plan Checking and Inspection
Services;and
WHEREAS,the CONTRACTOR submitted a Response to the RFP attached hereto as
Exhibit "B"and incorporated by this reference;and
WHEREAS,the COUNTY has evaluated the Contractor's response to RFP and has
determined that the Contractor is qualified and capable of performingthe workspecifiedinRFP.
NOW,THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows:
1.OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR
A.The CONTRACTOR shall provide Residential and Non-Residential Plan Checking
Services and Inspection Services work onanas neededbasisto reduceor eliminate delays,
pursuant to work as assigned by COUNTY.Services shall consist ofthe review of plans and
documents and inspection of construction for compliance wfth the California Code of Regulations,
Title 24,County of Fresno Ordinance Code Title 15 (Califomia Building,Fire,Mechanical,
Plumbing,and Electrical Codes,etal.),Disabled Access Requirements,and related work for the
Department of Public Works and Planning,Development Services Division.These Services areto
be provided onlywhen requested bythe COUNTY.
B. The CONTRACTOR agrees to perform the above Services as stated in the Request
forProposal (Exhibit "A")and CONSULTANT response to the RFP (Exhibit "B").
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.OBLIGATIONS OF THE COUNTY
A.The COUNTY will be represented under the terms of the Agreement byits Chief
Building Inspector.
B. COUNTY shall, to the extent reasonable and practical,assist and cooperate with
CONTRACTOR in the performance of the CONTRACTOR'S services described inthis
Agreement. Such cooperation and assistance shall include,butnot necessarily be limited to:(i)
providing one set of plans and documents to the CONTRACTOR at the COUNTY Office;(ii)
obtainingfromthe applicant, the necessary items to allowplan checking to be completed
expeditiously,such as complete plans, calculations and name and telephone number of applicant;
(iii)conducting zoning review with a listofzoning and other related information to be incorporated
intothe Plan Checking Letter to applicant;(iv)providingCONTRACTOR copies of COUNTY
Ordinances that modifythe standard regulations of review;(v)collect Plan Checking Fee from
applicant;and (vi)provideapplicant with plans,Correction Letteror modification of approval.
3.TERM
This Agreement shall become effective on the 10th day of March,2015 and shall terminate
on the 9th day of March,2016 unless extended in writing bythe Directorofthe Departmentof
Public Works and Planning or his/her designee.In no event shall the term of this Agreement
including extensions,exceed three years from the date of execution.
4.TERMINATION
A. Non-Allocation of Funds -The terms of this Agreement,and the services to be
provided thereunder,are contingent on the approval offunds bythe appropriating government
agency. Should sufficient funds not be allocated, the services provided may be modified,or this
Agreementterminated,at any timeby giving the CONTRACTOR thirty (30)days advance written
notice.
B.Breach of Contract -The COUNTY may immediately suspend or terminate this
Agreementinwholeor inpart,where inthe determination ofthe COUNTY there is:
1)An illegalor improper use of funds;
2) Afailureto comply withany term ofthis Agreement;
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3) A substantially incorrect or incomplete report submitted to the COUNTY;
4)Improperly performed service.
In no event shall any payment by the COUNTY constitute a waiver by the COUNTY
of any breach of this Agreement or any default which may then exist on the part ofthe
CONTRACTOR.Neither shall such payment impair or prejudice any remedy available to the
COUNTYwith respect to the breach or default.The COUNTYshall have the rightto demand of
the CONTRACTOR the repayment to the COUNTYof any funds disbursed to the CONTRACTOR
under this Agreement,which in the judgment of the COUNTY were not expended in accordance
with the terms ofthis Agreement.The CONTRACTOR shall promptly refund any such funds upon
demand.
C.Without Cause -Under circumstances other than those set forth above,this
Agreement may be terminated by COUNTY upon the giving of thirty (30)days advance written
notice of an intention to terminate to CONTRACTOR.
5.COMPENSATION/INVOICING
COUNTY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR and CONTRACTOR agrees to receive
compensation as described in Exhibit "C".For requested Plan Checking services,
CONTRACTOR shall be paid a fee or percentage of the Plan Review Fee collected by COUNTY
from the applicant as described in Exhibit MC".The amount of any such Plan Review Fee is
determined by COUNTY according to Section 2502 of the County of Fresno Master Schedule of
Fees,Charges,and Recovered Costs as outlined in Exhibit "D".CONTRACTOR shall submit
monthly invoices as agreed to between COUNTY and CONTRACTOR.
In no event shall services performed under this Agreement be in excess of $850,000.00
per year fromthe execution ofthis agreement.COUNTY'S compensation of CONTRACTOR will
be based entirely on plan check and building inspection activitylevel and assignment by COUNTY
to CONTRACTOR.CONTRACTOR is not entitled to a minimum amount of compensation under
this Agreement. Itis understood that all expenses incidentalto CONTRACTOR'S performance of
services under this Agreement shall be borne by CONTRACTOR.Upon receipt of a proper
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
invoice,the COUNTY Department of PublicWorks and Planning will take a maximum often (10)
working days to review,approve, and submit itto the COUNTY Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax
Collector.
Payment will be issued to CONSULTANT within forty-five (45)calendar days ofthe date
the Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector receives the approved invoice.
6.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
In performance of the work,duties and obligations assumed by CONTRACTOR under this
Agreement,itis mutually understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR,includingany and allofthe
CONTRACTOR'S officers,agents,and employees will at all times be acting and performing as an
independent contractor,and shall act in an independent capacity and not as an officer,agent,
servant,employee,jointventurer, partner, or associate ofthe COUNTY.Furthennore,COUNTY
shall have no rightto control or supervise or direct the manner or method by which
CONTRACTOR shall perform its work and function.However,COUNTY shall retain the rightto
administer this Agreement so as to verify that CONTRACTOR is performing itsobligations in
accordance with the terms and conditions thereof.
CONTRACTOR and COUNTY shall comply with all applicable provisions of the law and the
rules and regulations, ifany, of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over matters the
subject thereof.
Because of its status as an independent contractor,CONTRACTOR shall have absolutely
no right to employment rights and benefitsavailableto COUNTY employees.CONTRACTOR
shall be solely liable and responsible for providing to, or on behalf of, its employees all
legally-required employee benefits.In addition,CONTRACTOR shall be solelyresponsibleand
save COUNTY harmless from all matters relating to payment of CONTRACTOR'S employees,
including compliance with SocialSecurity withholding and allother regulations governing such
matters.Itis acknowledged that during the term of this Agreement,CONTRACTOR may be
providing services to others unrelated to the COUNTYor to this Agreement.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7.MODIFICATION
Any matters ofthis Agreement may be modifiedfrom time to time bythe written consent of
all the parties without,in any way,affecting the remainder.
8.NON-ASSIGNMENT
Neither party shall assign,transfer or sub-contract this Agreement nor their rights or duties
under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party.
9.HOLD HARMLESS
CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify,save,hold harmless,and at COUNTYS request,
defend the COUNTY, its officers,agents,and employees from any and all costs and expenses,
damages,liabilities,claims,and losses occuning or resulting to COUNTY in connection with the
performance,or failure to perform,by CONTRACTOR,its officers,agents,or employees under
this Agreement,and from any and all costs and expenses,damages,liabilities,claims,and losses
occurring or resulting to any person,firm,or corporation who may be injured or damaged by the
performance,or failure to perform,of CONTRACTOR,its officers,agents,or employees under this
Agreement.
10.INSURANCE
Without limiting the COUNTYs right to obtain indemnification from CONTRACTOR or any
third parties,CONTRACTOR,at its sole expense,shall maintain infull force and effect,the
following insurance policies or a program of self-insurance,including but not limited to,an
insurance pooling arrangement or Joint Powers Agreement (JPA)throughout the term of the
Agreement:
A.Commercial General Liability
Commercial General Liability Insurance with limits of not less than One Million
Dollars ($1,000,000.00)per occurrence and an annual aggregate of Two Million Dollars
($2,000,000.00).This policy shall be issued on a per occurrence basis.COUNTY may require
specific coverages including completed operations,products liability,contractual liability,
-5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Explosion-Collapse-Underground,fire legal liability or any other liability insurance deemed
necessary because of the nature of this Agreement.
B.Automobile Liability
Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance with limitsfor bodily injuryof not less
than Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00)per person,Five Hundred Thousand
Dollars ($500,000.00)per accident and for property damages of not less than Fifty Thousand
Dollars ($50,000.00),or such coverage with a combined single limitof Five Hundred Thousand
Dollars ($500,000.00).
Coverage should include owned and non-owned vehicles used in connection with this Agreement.
C.Professional Liability
If CONTRACTOR employs licensed professional staff,(e.g.,Ph.D.,R.N.,L.C.S.W.,
M.F.C.C.)in providing services,Professional Liability Insurance with limits of not less than One
Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00)per claim,Three Mill'ion Dollars ($3,000,000.00)annual aggregate.
D.Worker's Compensation
A policy of Worker's Compensation Insurance as may be required by the California
Labor Code.
CONTRACTOR shall obtain endorsements to the Commercial General Liability
Insurance naming the County of Fresno,its officers,agents,and employees,individually and
collectively,as additional insured,but only insofar as the operations under this Agreement are
concerned.Such coverage for additional insured shall apply as primary insurance and any other
insurance,or self-insurance,maintained by COUNTY,its officers,agents and employees shall be
excess only and not contributing with insurance provided under CONTRACTOR'S policies herein.
This insurance shall not be cancelled or changed without a minimum of thirty (30)days advance
written notice given to COUNTY.
Within thirty (30)days from the date CONTRACTOR signs and executes this
Agreement,CONTRACTOR shall provide Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements as stated
above for all of the foregoing policies,as required herein,to the County of Fresno,Department of
-6-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Public Works and Planning,Director,2220 Tulare Street,6th Floor,Fresno,CA 93721,stating that
such insurance coverage has been obtained and is in full force;that the County of Fresno,its
officers,agents and employees will not be responsible for any premiums on the policies;that such
Commercial General Liability Insurance names the County of Fresno,its officers,agents and
employees,individually and collectively,as additional insured,but only insofar as the operations
under this Agreement are concerned;that such coverage for additional insured shall apply as
primary insurance and any other insurance,or self-insurance,maintained by COUNTY, its
officers,agents and employees,shall be excess only and not contributing with insurance provided
under CONTRACTOR'S policies herein;and that this insurance shall not be cancelled or changed
without a minimum of thirty (30)days advance,written notice given to COUNTY.
In the event CONTRACTOR fails to keep in effect at all times insurance coverage
as herein provided,the COUNTY may, in addition to other remedies it may have,suspend or
terminate this Agreement upon the occurrence of such event.
All policies shall be issued by admitted insurers licensed to do business in the State
of California,and such insurance shall be purchased from companies possessing a current A.M.
Best,Inc.rating of A FSC VII or better.
11.AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS:
The CONTRACTOR shall at any time during business hours,and as often as the COUNTY
may deem necessary,make available to the COUNTY for examination all of its records and data
with respect to the matters covered by this Agreement.The CONTRACTOR shall,upon request
by the COUNTY, permit the COUNTY to audit and inspect all of such records and data necessary
to ensure CONTRACTOR'S compliance with the terms of this Agreement.
Ifthis Agreement exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00),CONTRACTOR shall be
subject to the examination and audit of the Auditor General for a period of three (3)years after
final payment under Agreement (Government Code Section 8546.7).
-7-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12.NOTICES:
The persons and their addresses having authority to give and receive notices under this
Agreement include the following:
COUNTY OF FRESNO CONTRACTOR
Jeff Janes,Chief Building Inspector Ron Beehler, RegionalManager
Department of Public Works &Planning Interwest Consulting Group
2220 Tulare Street,6*1 Floor 7491 N Remington Ave.Suite 103
Fresno,CA 93721 Fresno,CA 93711
Any and all notices between the COUNTY and the CONTRACTOR provided for or
permitted under this Agreement or by law shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly served
when personally delivered to one of the parties,or in lieu of such personal services,when
deposited inthe United States Mail,postage prepaid,addressed to such party.
13.GOVERNING LAW
Venue for any action arising out ofor related to this Agreement shall only be in Fresno
County,California.
The rights and obligations of the parties and all interpretation and performance of this
Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of California.
14.DISCLOSURE OF SELF-DEALING TRANSACTIONS
This provision is only applicable if the CONTRACTOR is operating as a
corporation (a for-profit or non-profit corporation)or if during the term of the agreement,the
CONTRACTOR changes its status to operate as a corporation.
Members of the CONTRACTOR'S Board of Directors shall disclose any self-
dealing transactions that they are a party to while CONTRACTOR is providing goods or
performing services under this agreement.A self-dealing transaction shall mean a transaction
to which the CONTRACTOR is a party and in which one or more of its directors has a material
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
financial interest.Members of the Board of Directors shall disclose any self-dealing
transactions that they are a party to by completing and signing a Self-Dealing Transaction
Disclosure Form,attached hereto as Exhibit "E"and incorporated herein by reference,and
submitting itto the COUNTY prior to commencing with the self-dealing transaction or
immediately thereafter.
15.ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the CONTRACTOR and
COUNTY with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all previous Agreement
negotiations,proposals,commitments,writings,advertisements,publications,and understanding
of any nature whatsoever unless expressly included inthis Agreement.
In the event of any inconsistency in interpreting the documents which constitute this Agreement,
the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order of priority:(1)the
text ofthis Agreement (excluding Exhibit "A",the COUNTYS Request for Proposal); (2) Exhibit
"B",the CONTRACTOR'S proposal in response thereto;and (3) Exhibit "C",CONTRACTOR'S
compensation as stated inCONTRACTOR'S response to the COUNTYS Request for Proposal.
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
-9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
//
//
//
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed thisAgreementas ofthe day
and year first hereinabove written.
CONTRA'COUNTY OF FRE
gnature)
AJ
Chairman,Board of Supervisors
,qa)KeEtfceK
Print-Name &Title .
Mailing Address ^rfe^o,CA <?*7//
ATTEST:
BERNICE E.SEIDEL,Clerk
Board of Supervisors
Deputy
MAR 10 2015
By r*~
DATE:
APPROVED AS\Tp LEGAL FORM
Countv Counsel
FOR ACCOUNTING USE ONLY:
ORG No.:
Account No.
Req.No.:
43600200
7295
4361100021
DATE:
REVIEWED &RECOMMENDED FOR
APPROVAL
Department Head's Signature
APPROVED AS TO ACCOUNTING
FORM
QjL^U
Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector
FCMC 06/11
G:\4360Devs&Pln\ADMIN\BOARD\Board ltems\2015\3-10-15\Plan Checkand Building Inspection ServicesVAgreement - InterwestConsulting
Group.doc
-10-
EXHIBIT A
County of Fresno
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING
ALAN WEAVER
DIRECTOR
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
The County of Fresno is soliciting bids for services of a qualified Building Plans
Checker(s) to check residential, industrial and commercial building plans and a Buflding
lnspector(s) to Inspect residential, Industrial, commercial, and agricultural projects.
SUBMIITAL:
ADDRESSED TO:
MAILING AND
DEUVERY SERVICE
ADDRESS:
MARK ENVELOPE:
INQUIRIES:
ISSUANCE DATE:
Four (4) copies must be received on or before:
Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 4:00 p.m.
Jeff Janes, Chief Building Inspector
Fresno County
Department of Public Works and Planning
Development Services Division
2220 Tulare Street, Sixth Floor
Fresno, CA 93721-2104
PROPOSAL-"Plan Check and BuDding Inspection
Servlcesn
Direct questions or requested clarifications about the
Request for Proposal (RFP) documents to Jeff Janes. Chief
Building Inspector, at (559) 600-4232, or fax (559) 600-
4200, or by emalltng jjanes@co.fresno.ca.us at the
Department of Public Works and Planning, Development
Services Division, County of Fresno. The Development
Services Division offices are located at 2220 Tulare Street.
southwest corner of Tulare and "M" Street. Suite A, Street
Level, Fresno, CA 93721.
VVednesday,Oeoember17,2014
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
2220 Tulare snet. Sbdh Floor I Frasi'ID. Callromfa 93721/ Phone (559) 5()1)..4497 I 150().4540 I 800-4022.1 FAX 131»4200
Equal EmPloyment OPJX!rtunlly • Aflirmallve Action • Disabled Employer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARDCLE DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
I. SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................................................. 3
II. PROPOSAL CONTENT AND ORGANIZATION ........................ 7
Ill. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION ...................... 10
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBITS
EXHIBITS
FEE SCHEDULE
TITLE 15 -BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION ORDINANCE
CHAPTERS 15.04-15.28 AND 15.60
COUNTY OF FRESNO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
I. SCOPE OF SERVICES
The County will contract with up to four multfdiscipflnary firms to provide professfonal pran
checking and building inspection services in support of the Building & Safety Section
functions at the direction of the Chief Building Inspector or his designee. These setvices
are only to be provided when required by the County of Fresno and will consist of a total of
four (4) separate contracts. Two (2) contracts for eight hundred and fifty thousand
dollars ($850,000.00) annually and two (2) contracts for one hundred thousand
dollars annually {$100,000.00).
At the County's option, the plan review may be performed in whole or in part by using one
of the different packages defined below. The fee for packages ljA" through "E" may be set
up as a percentage of the fee received by the County for plan review for the given project
based on the current adopted fee schedule. The maximum fee shall not exceed 65% of
the plan review fee received by the County for the whole buildfng review. Where a partial
review is requested by the County, the maximum fee shall not exceed 40% of the plan
review fee received by the County for both structural and nonstructural review. Proposals
shall Include fee break downs In each of the following categories and, other than hourly
fees. shall Include the costs of the initial review and all subsequent reviews. Plan reviews
and inspections are to include enforcement of all applicable Federal, State, and Local
regulations and policies.
A) Plan Check ''Packages.,
a. Plan Review Package "A"
Complete structural and non-structural commercial bulldfng plan review
b. Plan Review Package "B"
Complete non-structural commercial building plan review
c. Plan Review Package "C"
Complete structural commercial building plan review
d. Plan Review Package "0"
Complete residential building plan review
e. Plan Review Package "E"
Complete structural residential building plan review
f. Plan Review Package "F"
Hourly fee for non-structural plan review services
g. Plan Review Package .. G,
Hourly fee for structural plan review services
h. Building Inspection Package "H"
Hourly fee for commercial andfor residential building Inspection services
Page3
COUNTY OF FRESNO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
I. Plan Review Package "I.,
Hourly fee for site improvement Inspection services
j. Plan Review Package "J"
Hourly fee for permit processing services
No additional fees shall be charged to the County for completion of the work In any of the
packages listed (other than approved hourly fees, where applicable), including, but not
limited to, pick up, delivery, mileage, shipping, meetings, phone calls, and other materials,
labor and handling.
B) Availability
1. The Consultant shall perform the plan review services required to obtain approval of
each project for the percentage of fee proposed. Prior approval by the County Is
required for any and all charges proposed in addition to the percentage agreed to fn
the Plan Review Package. Prior approval by the County is required for any and all
charges proposed for deferred submittals and revisions that may occur on projects
reviewed by the Consultant
2. The response time for the Consultant to return a list of comments to the County or
provide approval to the County for all plan review projects from the day of
authorization by the County Is ten ( 1 0) business days on the first review and five (5)
business days on subsequent reviews. If the list of comments or approval is
returned to the County in one {1) to five (5) business days in excess of the due date,
a 10% reduction in cost to the County shall be provided. If the response time of five
(5) to ten (10) business days is in excess of the due date, the plan review shall be
completed at 50% reduction to the County. Anything in excess of 10 days shaD be
completed at no cost to the County. The Consultant shall notify the County at least
two (2) business days In advance if the plans will not be completed within the
stipulated time frame. The response time for more complex projects as determined
by the County may be negotiable.
3. List a "typical• notification time required for the Consultant to provide fnspectlon staff
for the County.
4. Indicate the availability of the Consultant's personnel assigned to the plan check to
attend a meeting at the County to address questions or discuss issues wfth County
staff, design team and/or construction team that may arise on a proJect at no
addmonal cost to the County for projects paid on percentage. Meetings may occur
prior to permit submittal, during the review process and after pennit Issuance and
typically will not exceed two hours for each meeting.
Page4
COUNTY OF FRESNO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
5. Indicate the availability of Consultant's representative to attend bi-monthly plan
review and/or inspection related meetings at the County at no additional cost to the
County. Estimate meeUng duration of two hours.
6. Indicate the availability of the Consultant's staff to discuss projects and technical
data via phone or other means with the County's staff, design team and/or
construction team at no additional cost to the County for plan reviews paid on
percentage.
7. Indicate processing times and costs for plan reviews that the County may require to
be expedited. Typically, an expedited review would be one half of the normal
response time listed in B-2 above.
8. Describe the capability of your firm to provide electronic plan reviews and Indicate if
there are any reductions in the Consultant's plan review costs if this service is
utilized. Provide a brief description and flow chart of how this process Is
accomplished.
9. Indicate your ability to provfde third-party plan revlewsllnspections by allowing an
applicant to provide payment directly to the Consultant for Consultant's portion of
the plan review fee or inspection costs. Also submit samples of any forms that may
be utilized for this procedure.
C) Statement of Work
Upon award of a contract, the Consultant shall perform plan review services and/or field
inspection services.
Plan Review Services:
Plan review shall be performed at the Consultant's offices unless specific
arrangements are made with the County.
1. Consultant shall assign personnel who are professionally qualified to perform
commercial and/or residential construction document plan check and shall be
International Code Council (fCC) certified plans examiners.
2. Consultant shall designate one individual as the responsible contact for an
communications between the County and Consultant for the lffe of the contract and,
In the event the contact changes, notify County immediately.
3. Consultant shall furnish assigned personnel with all necessary materials, resources
and training to conduct plan review and inspection services, Including a curTent copy
of applicable County amendments, policies, procedures and forms.
Page5
COUNTY OF FRESNO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
4. Plan review approval shall not be recommended to the County until All code
complfance Issues are resolved to the best of Consultant's knowledge and all permit
Issuance requirements of the County of Fresno are satisfied. Consultant shall
contact County if there are questions.
5. Consultant shall respond within one business day upon each notification that a plan
check is authorized.
6. Consultant shall pick up all documents to be reviewed from the County of Fresno,
Public Works and Planning, Development Services Division located at 2220 Tulare
Street. Suite A. Fresno, CA. Stated plan review turnaround times will begin the next
business day after the Consultant has been notified by the County. Consultant shall
conduct each plan review in a timely manner and within time-frame guidelines
established by the County. Refer to B-2. Upon completion of each plan review, the
Consultant shall return the reviewed documents to the County and provide an
electronic and hard copy of the plan review comments In the format designated by
the County. Upon completion of the plan review where approval of the documents
is recommended, the Consultant shall provide (2) complete sets of an final review
documents annotated as approved to the County of Fresno.
7. Plan review comment letters shall be completed in the format provided by the
County.
8. Code interpretations are subject to final review and approval by the County BuDding
Official. All plan review comments completed by the consultant are subject to the
review by the County.
9. Consultant shall be available within one business day to respond to questions from
the County that may be generated during field inspection for each authorized plan
check that is subsequently issued a permit for construction.
Permit Processing Services:
1. All permit processing and counter services shall be perfonned at the County office
and under the direction of County staff.
2. Consultant shall assign personnel who are professionally qualified to perform permit
processing and counter services. All on-site materials, resources, tools and County
policy training shall be supplied by the County.
Page6
COUNTY Ol! I!NOESNO N!QUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Field Inspection Services:
1 . All field Inspection shall be performed through the County of Fresno Development
Services Division and under the direction of County staff.
2. Consultant shall assign personnel who are professionally qualified to perform
commercial and/or residential construction inspection and shall be ICC certified as
building Inspectors. All vehicles, safety apparel, communication devices,
materials, resources, tools, and training shall be supplied by the Consultant.
3. County shall provide County-specific policy training and provide any necessary
County maps, forms, and data entry training.
4. List a atypical" notification tfme required for the Consultant to provide Inspection
staff for the County.
5. Projects under construction by permit from the County shall be Inspected for
compliance per the California Code of Regulations-Title 24, Parts 1-12, and
Fresno County Title 15 (Building and Construction Ordinance).
II. PROPOSAL CONTENT AND ORGANIZATION
Proposals should be limited to specific discussion of the elements outlined in this RFP.
The Intent of this RFP is to encourage responses whfch meet the stated requirements, and
which propose the best methods to accomplish the work within a stated budget
The organization of the proposal should follow the general outline below. Each proposal
should consist of four ( 4) copies of the technical proposaL
A. Transmittal Letter
1. The transmittal letter shall include the name, title, address, phone number, and
original signature of an individual with authority to negotiate on behalf of and to
contractually bind the consulting firm, and who may be contacted during the period
of proposal evaluation. Only one transmittal letter need be prepared to accompany
an copies of the technical and cost proposals.
B. Table of Contents
1. Provide a list of sections in the proposal and the associated page numbers.
C. Scope of Wo[Js
1. Provide the scope of work information in a format such that It can be pulled out of
the RFP and inserted fnto the contract as a schedule and include the cost for each
package in a table format. If necessary, discuss reasons for any revisions to the
Page7
COUNTY OF FRESNO REQUEST FOR JSROPOSAL
requirements as described and provide sufficient detail for any modified approach,
methods, and tasks.
D. Proiact Deli\terables
1. The deliverables shall be consistent with Section I of this proposal. This shall
include a summary of the Project Dellverables with schedule. Provide the project
defiverables with schedule in a format that can be pulled out of the RFP and
inserted Into the contract as a schedule. If necessary, discuss reasons for any
revisions to the requirements or sample contract as described and provide sufficient
detaH for any modified approach, methods, and tasks or terminology.
E. Consultant and Sub-Consultant Staff-Qualificatjpns & Exoerlence
1. This section shall describe the qualifications and experience of each professional
who will participate in the project, including a resume for each member of the project
team. A project manager must be designated, and an organizational chart showing
the manager and all project staff must be included. A matrix or organization chart
shall be Included, indicating the effort, either in percentage of the total projector in
person-hours, which will be contributed by each professional durfng each phase or
task making up the project. Key personnel who are included in the proposal must
be committed for the duration of the contract. Any substitutions or changes to the
project team must be brought to the attention of the County and approved. ff a sub-
consultant will be used, the proposing Consultant shall include a letter from the sub-
consultant committing to perform at least the work shown for the sub-contracting
professional !n the above-described matrix.
F. Con&ultant Qualifications and References
1. This section shall describe the nature and outcome of projects previously conducted
by the Consultant which are related to the work described within the RFP.
Descriptions shall Include client contact names, address, phone numbers, email
addresses. descriptions of the type of work performed, approximate dates on which
the work was completed, and professional staff who performed the work. If a sub-
Consultant is proposed, two to three similar qualifications and references shall be
provided for all sub-Consultants.
G. Cost Information
1. Develop the cost as described in Section I of this proposal. Provide the cost
information In a format that it can be pulled out of the RFP and Inserted Into the
contract as a schedule and include the scope of work for each package fn a 1able
formal If necessary, discuss reasons for any revisions to the requirements as
described and provide sufficient detail for any modified approach, methods, and
tasks.
PageS
COUNTY OF FRESNO REQUE§T FOR PROPOSAL
H. Invoicing
1 . Invoices shall include the County's Application Number, Address of Project. Project
Name and the amount billed for each project. If the project was performed on an
hourly basis, the invoice shall include each person's name, title, hourly rate, and
hours being billed to the County.
2. Where applicable, when the first review is completed and returned to the County,
each project shall be accompanied by a Fee Calculation Sheet Indicating the
amount that will be billed to the County and a breakdown of the associated costs.
I. Insurance Coverage
1. Plan check and building inspection Consultant will be required to have the following
Insurance coverage:
(a) Commercial General Liability
Commercral General Liability Insurance with limits of not less
than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and an
annual aggregate of two million dollars ($2,000,000.00). This
policy shall be issued on a per occurrence basis. County may
require specific coverage including completed operations,
product liability, contractual liability, explosion-collapse-
underground, fire and legal liability, or any other liability
insurance deemed necessary because of the nature of the
contract.
b) Automobile Llabllitv
Comprehensive automobile liability insurance wlth limits for
bodily Injury of not less than two hundred fifty thousand dollars
($250,000.00} per person, five hundred thousand dollars
($500,000.00) per accident and for property damages of not
less than frfty thousand dollars ($50,000.00), or such coverage
with a combined single limit of five hundred thousand dollars
{$500,000.00). Coverage should fncJude ovvned and non-
owned vehicles used in connection with this Agreement.
c) ProfessiQnal Liability
If Contractor employs licensed professional staff, (e.g., Ph.D .•
R.N., L.C.S.W .• M.F.C.C.) in providing services, professional
liability insurance with limits of not less than one million dollars
($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, three million dollars
($3,000,000.00) annual aggregate.
Page9
cOUNTY OF FRESNO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAl
d) Workers Compensation
A policy of Worker's Compensation insurance as may be
required by the California Labor Code.
Ill. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION
A project Selection Committee will be formed to evaluate the proposals and select
one or more consultants. The Selection Committee will consist of members from
the Department of Public Works and Planning and may include a representative
knowledgeable in plan check and building inspection services from outside the
community. Consulting firms will be requested to interview with the Selection
Committee as a part of the evaluation process.
PROPOSAL SCHEDULE (TENTATIVE)
Proposals due to County of Fresno
Finalist Interviews and fee proposal
Finalist negotiations complete
Finalist returns signed contract
Board of Supervisors hearing to
consider contract
Notice to proceed issued
Tuesday, December 30, 2014,
4:00p.m.
Wednesday, January 14,2015
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
Tuesday, February 24,2015
Friday, February 27,2015
The above schedule is tentative and partially dependent upon the size of the
contract. Contracts totaling $100,000 or more require Fresno County Board of
Supervisor approval. The firms' fee proposals wlll be opened only after the
Selection Committee has completed all of the interviews and considered each of the
firms' qualifications. The Selection Committee will consider the fee proposal in its
final deliberations.
The Selection Committee will consider the following recommended experience in its
evaluation of proposals (not necessarily listed in order of importance).
Proposals will be compared based upon a combination of factors, and a contract or
contracts will be awarded based upon the recommendation of the panel*s evaluation of the
fadors. More than one contract may be awarded. The factors to be considered are:
• Professional qualifications of the personnel proposed to perform the work.
• Prior experience of the Consultant in providing plan check or Inspection services to
the County and to other jurisdictions.
• Availability of the Consultant to perform necessary services upon demand.
Page 10
COUNTY OF FRESNO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
• Location of Consultanfs offices providing services.
• Avatlabillty of one individual from the Consultant to be the contact person for the
County on all projects.
• Other factors the panel may determine as relevant to the ability of the applicant to
perform the required services.
Consultant Qualifications:
Applicant shall demonstrate that they possess the foDowing minimum qualifications or
equivalent as determined by the City:
International Code Council (ICC) Certified Plans Examiner
Licensed professional engineer
Certified Access Specialist (CASp)
ICC Certified Building Inspector combinations
ICC Certified Building Pennit Technician
Current valid State of California driver's license
Page 11
EXHIBIT B
Section A
Scope of Work
We understand that the County of Fresno is seeking the services of a highly quaified multidisciplinary firm with local
experience to provide professional plan checking and building inspection services in support of the County of Fresno
Development Services Division. These se!Vices are to be provided on an on-call basis as determined by the County.
At the County's option, aH requested services wil be performed in whole or in part by using one of the various service
packages established by the County as deftned in the RFP and included in Section E of this proposal. The fees for each
plan check package are established as a percentage of the plan check fee charged by the County for the service
requested or charged hourly based on the specifrc type of service being requested. Proposed fees for plan check
services include the costs of the initial review and an subsequent reviews required to obtain approval of ezh project.
Plan reviews and inspections win include enforcement of an applicable Federal, State, and Local regulations and
policies. No additional fees wifl be charged to complete the services outlined in the plan review service packages listed,
including but not limited to, pick up, delivery, miteage, shipping, meetings, phone calls, and other materials, labor and
handling. We understand that prior approval by the County is required for any and aft charges proposed in addition to
the percentage agreed to in the plan check service packages including any charges proposed for deferred submittal and
revisions that may occur. For additional details on costs and fees, please refer to Section E of this proposal.
SCOPE OF WORK
Upon award of a contract, lnterwest Consulting shall perform plan review services and/or field inspection services as
outrmed below.
Plan Review Services:
1. Plan review services shaft be performed at and/or directed from our local Fresno office .
. · 2. lnterwest shall assign personnel who are professionally qualified to perfonn commercial andJor residential
construction document plan check and shalf be International Code Council (ICC) certified plans exarnilers orCA
Licensed Engineers.
3. lnterwest shall designate one indiWtual as the responsible contact for an c:ommunications between the County
ard Consultant for the life of the contract and, in the event the contact changes, the County wil be notified
immediately.
4. Jnterwest shall furnish assigned personnel with all necessary materials, resources and training to conduct plan
review and inspection servk:es, including a current copy of applicable County amendments, policies, procedures
and forms.
5. Plan review approval shall not be recommended to the County untR all code compliance issues are resolved to
the best of our knowledge and all permit issuance requirements of the County of Fresno are satisfied. lnterwest
shall contact County if there are questions.
6. lnterwest shall respond wtthin one business day upon each notifK:ation that a plan check is authorized. We will
pCk up all assigned projects from the County office. County personnel will not need to package, label, schedule
and coordinate pick up of plans by a third party shipping service.
7. lnterwest shaD pick up all documents to be reviewed from the County of Fresno, PuNic W<ms and Planning,
Development Services Oivisbn located at 2220 Tulare Street, Suite A, Fresno, CA. Stated pfan review
turnaround times will begin the next business day after lnterwest has been notified by the County. We will
conduct each plan review in a timely manner and within time-frame guidelines established by the County. Upon
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. 1 www.interwestgrp.com PAGE 1
• • • • • • • • • • • ' • • • • • • ' ' ' ' ' ~
~
' ' ~
• •
~
•
•
l
l
~
~
~
~
completion of each plan review, lnterwest will return the reviewed documents to the County and provide an
electronic and hard copy of the plan review comments in the format designated by the County .
8. Upon completion of the plan review where approval of the documents is recommended, lnterwest wilt provide (2)
complete sets of all final review documents annotated as approved to the County of Fresno .
9. Plan review comment letters will be completed in the fonnat requested by the County .
10. Code interpretations are subject to final review and approval by the County Building Official. All pla1 review
comments completed by lnterwest are subject to the review by the Collnty .
11. lnterwest staff shall be available within one business day to respond to questions from the County that may be
generated during field inspection for each authorized plan check that is subsequently issued a permit for
construction.
Permit Processing Services:
12. All permH processing and counter services shall be performed at the County office and under the direction of
County staff .
13. lnterwest win assign personnel who are professionally quarlfied to perform permit processing and coonter
services .
Field Inspection Services:
14. All field inspection win be performed through the County of Fresno Development Services DiYision and under
the direction of Collnty staff.
15. lnterwest wiD assign personnel who are professionalty quatified to perform commercial and/or residential
construction inspection and shall be ICC certified as building inspectors. All vehicles, safety apparel,
communication deW:es, materials, resotii'CeS, tools, and training wift be Sllpplied by the lnterwest.
16. County shall provide County-specific policy training and provkie any necessary County maps, forms, and data
entry training.
17. lnterv.'est wil provide inspection staff to the County with 24 hour notification; same day inspectk)n staffing
may be available based on availabifrty of staff resources.
18. Projects under construction by permit from the County will be inspected for compliance per the cantomia
Code of Regulations -Title 24, Parts 1-12, and Fresno County Title 15 (Building and Construction
Ordinance) .
UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
We understand the County is looking for a consultant who can provide an experienced team to provide as needed
plan review, permit processing and building inspection services. Services should seamlessly integrate and
coordinate with the County's other departments and provide l.lflinterrupted, efficient, and cost effective building
department services to the public. lnterwest Consulting Group has a proven track record providing these same
services to many California jurisdictions.
The following section will discuss our approach, highlight our experience and outline how we can satisfy the
requirements identified within the RFP. Our services can consist of providing a sillQ.Ie staff member or a complete
team in the areas of plan review and field inspection services. We witt tailor our services to fit the specific needs of
the County of Fresno. lnterwest staff in the local Fresno oftk:e will be available to pick up and deliver assigned pt«t
checks (at NO additional cost), avoidtng the need to package and coordinate shipping of assigned projects.
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com PAGE 2
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' • • • • • • • • • •
At the completion of plan review a transmittal providing project information, permit number and the extent of review
requested will be included with the plans. We wiU complete all requested plan check services in accordance with the
time schedules contained in this proposal.
We view our role and mission is· to provide the following:
./ A team of professionals with high-level experience and skills in successful management of
building department services, staff with a customer service focus and thorough knowledge
of building department policies and procedures, and promoting cooperation and partnership
with other County departments and outside agencies
./ Licensed Plan Review Engineers and/or ICC certified Plans Examiners for thorough and
timely plan rev;ews of commercial, residential and government ,.cyeds, as appropriate, to
ensure complfance to an Building Codes and c~ and State laws
and requirements .
./ Licensed Structural Engineers who have extensive experience with
large and complex prqjects including commercial, residential and
government projects .
./ CASp certified staff who are intimately familiar with the regulatory
requirements related to ensuring buildings comply with the latest
accessibility guidelines and requirements .
./ Certified Inspectors and Permit Technicians with broad experience in jurisdictional
procedures and the highest commitment to customer service .
./ Services in a cost -effective manner that remain wit.hin budget constraints .
•· ./ Provide pick up and delivery of an plans to and from the County at no cost to the County .
PROJECT CONTROLS
The services we provide are always closely coordinated and monitored to ensure we meet or exceed the service
levels desired by the County, but also stay within the frnancial capacity of your operating budget. We have broad
experience and "hands on" knowtedge of municipal budgeting, specifically related to expenditures and cost recovety
associated with private development processing and permitting. We will wor1t in close partnership with the County
tailoring our services and deployment of staff to match the allocated budget.
A crucial project control involves generating timely invoices tailored to County needs. We closely track all operations
monitoring project schedutes, invoices, as wen as project tracking via a customized database with routine OYerSight
by the assigned ~er. This critical information keeps us within budget, provides knowledge of when to staff up or
down, and ensures all projects are reviewed and returned in a timely manner .
lnterwest Consulting will submit invoicing to the County of Fresno with each approved plan review project. The
invoices win include all of the details requested in the RFP. See Section F of this proposal for additional invoicing
details .
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE3
it • • • • • • • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • • .. • ' ..
' • • • .. .. • .. ..
It
8
" .. • ..
BUILDING AND SAFETY PLAN REVIEW
It is critical that projects flow quickly and smoothly through the regulatory approval process. We fuRy understand this
critical component You11 find our people are ready to assist with solutions and recommendations that are specific to
your needs .
All plans examination services .win be performed under the direction of a licensed Civil or StructuTal Engineer and/or
an ICC certified Plans Examiner, with CASp certi1ication as necessary, for the specific project For more complex
projects and when needed to meet peak workload demands, additOnal support win be provided. Our plans examiners
understand and are intimatety familiar with appfJCable building codes and plan review procedures and policies and
wiD readily assist with solutions to complicated plan review Issues .
Plans wiU be checked for conformance with the latest adopted version of the California Building Code, California
Residential Code, Caflfomia Green Building Standards Code, California Mechanical Code, Cafrfomia Ptumbing Code,
Caflfomia Electrical Code, and the Accessibility and Energy Conservation requirements as mandated by State Trtle
24 and aU applicable local amendments and ordinances. We will create and maintain an electronic Jurisdk:tion File
containing our research on any unique amendments or specifications required by your jurisdiction, billing
arrangements, contact information and any special requests you would like us to keep in mind .
Our plan review services wiJJ be directed out of our local Fresno office and we will work with project appbnts in a
collaborative and professional manner to quickly identify and resotve any violations of codes, standards or local
ordinances. We wiU provide thorough plan reviews in an effort to provide complete and accurate constJUction
documents to minimize questions and problems during the construction phase of projects. Plan review comments
will be specific, detailed, complete, and reference plan sheet numbers and code sections where appficable. lnterwest
wifl provide a clear, concise, and thorough plan review comment letter from which clients, designers, contractors, and
owners can work .
Upon completion of our final review, two sets of submitted documents bearing lnterwest plan review stamp and a
final letter recommending the County's approval of the documents wiD be returned to the County for review and
~rmit issuance .
Code Interpretations
Code interpretations are subject to final review and approval by the Building Official and or County designated staff.
Our engineers and plans examiners will provide unbiased recommendations and background information to help the
Building Official make an informed decision. All plan review comments are subject to review and approval by the
County Building Department.
Transporting Plans
lnterwesfs local office is conveniently located in Fresno and our staff will arrange for all pick-up and delivery of plan
review documents from the County at no cost. In most cases, we are able to provide same-day service .
Plan Review Tracking Method & On-Line
Project Status
Our onnne tracking system can provide real time data related to
project status using our custom-designed web template geared
to provide any reporting and information needs required by both
the County and project applicants.
• -.. -.....,.., .. ___ _ -------·-.J•----· -·· --·--·----------· ·~"''" ....... , ··~ . .,.., ,..,,_ . ....,.... ~. . --....... -~ . .. ....... ..-.................... ,_ ..... -· ,_ .. --_:-.: .::"'· :: :-: :::::::.:-~ =.=:·:.: ~~----_ ... ,._
·--,...., ~-,. .. .,..,_... •J:'J:~I•l ..,.,
::,~ .. ::~· :: ::: :.::;:: ::: :.~:.:-...... ...~ ~ .,
~ ~.:.:: ;.."': ;.::,: .. ~:;;~-... :..·-..... -~
........ ,.,_ -....... ....__ .. ";.~J' ........ _, ...... .. .., .,. ·= . .., .......... _--....... ~
, ..... ~ ...... ·-_,.. "'""''::0:!*·-.. •. .... .. .• :.:~..;::;-.••••
.• k···~-· ·-•·«···· .. _............. ..~··· ··••• -·.: .. ~......... _.,. ... --... .. ... ._ .
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE4
lnterwest uses a custom-designed database to maintain and track all plans throughout the review process from the
moment you request a pick-up and/or shipment to delivery of the final, approved documents. Information such as
project name, County's project number, assigned plan reviewer(s), date documents were received, pfao review cycle
and completion date for current review are provided. Custom reports can easily be developed and emailed to the
designated County representative .
. ·
Electronic Plan Check Services
lnterwest currently provides electronic permitting and plan review services for multiple jurisdictions. Within our local
offices we maintain state of the art etectronic plan review stations. We provide electronic plan check ~
drawings that are either uploaded directly by the County or designer to our FTP site and/or the County's FTP site,
Dropbox account, or other County approved file transfer system. We provide electronic plan check services utilizing
the same billing rate as hard copy plan reviews. We have found the jurisdictions with whom we work, includilg their
respective customers, have a wide range of needs and expectations regarding electronic plan review and permitting
services.
We have worked with some clients to develop electronic plan review systems utiRzing several of the open market
software applications and hosting sites avaJlable. Some clients, such as Salt Lake City and Clark County, Nevada-
both jurisdictions with highly complicated commercial development activities -have established comprehensive
electronic permit and plan review systems. In contrast, we have found jurisdictions that have primarily light
commercial and residential development, simply need access to our FTP site to allow their Applicants the abifrty to
upload digital content directly to our staff.
Creating a system tailored to the needs of the individual client utiiZing readily available software allows for the
customization of the system to easily integrate the electronic plan review system with the needs of other
departments. With the plethora of commercially available FTP sites available for electronic file hosting at nominal
costs there is no longer a need for agencies to purchase or lease expensive proprietary systems. Recently,
lnterwest's IT staff established a comprehensive electronic permitting and plan review system for the City of EHt
Grove utilizjng commereialty-available software that is not proprietary to lnterwest or any other service provider.
ARCHITECT UPLOADS
DOCUMENTS
TOFTPSITE
Customer Service
:,
I '
. I '\ I DOCUMENTSAVAILABLE \
i FOR INTERWEST .
i TO RETRIEVE
,\,,
I OOCUMENTSAVAILABLE \
I FOR THE COUNTY
TO RETRIEVE
Our company emphasizes superior customer service to all of our employees. We take an out-of-the-box approach to
performing our duties, always wiRing to meet with clients for pre-design meetings, pre-submittal meetings or as
needed to resotve complex code related plan review issues in the most efficient manner possible. In addition, the
staff at lntetwest brings a can-do attitude to their work-always focused on efficient plan review processes and
successful project outcomes.
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE5
;
j
' t
• , ,
' ' • ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t
•
•
•
•
lnterwest's engineers, architects, plans examiners, permit technicians and inspectors lll"'derstand the importance of
· providing superior customer service to applicants, contractors and designers. Our philosophy is to provide our
services in a professional, courteous and colaborative manner. We encourage our staff to 'IIOit as part of the project
team to insure successful project outcomes.
Our staff is available during ~ard business hours to answer questions via phone or email regarding the actual
plan review in progress. We maintain active email accounts and our staff will be responsive to any County or
applicant needs. If we cannot speak directly to a caller, we will return calls no later than 24 hours .
Special Projects
lnterwest is able to accommodate special project plan review needs such as fast-track, multi-phased, or accelerated
plan reviews. We establish project specific tum-around goals and procedures with jurisdiction staff for these types of
projects based on the complexity of the projects as well as the construction schedule .
lnterwsst 's staff of engineers and plans examiners will work with the County of Fresno as weU as with applicants and
designers to resolve au plan review issues. Our staff will deal directly with appl'lcants and their designers during the
plan review process to resolve au issues. lnterwest wi1l furnish assigned personnel with au materials, resources and
training necessary to conduct plan reviews, including a current copy of the applicable County amendments, poicies,
procedures and forms .
Third Party Plan Review
lnterwest Consulting currently provides third party plan review and thtrd party inspection services on behlalf of
multiple client agencies. When utiriZing these services, we contract directly with the project appticants and will
provide plan review and inspection services in accordance with and following all normal procedures as required by
the County. For each project where the County of Fresno request us to pmvide third party services, we wiD generate
a propc:JI81 specific to the sc:ope of work being requested and wiD execute a written contract directty with the project
~licant. Copies of all third party proposals wiD be copied to the County Official .
Technical Capabilities in Plan Check Areas
The lnterwest staff members selected for this project possess signif1C311t technical capabilities in an of the requested
areas of plan review competence .
CASp
lnterwest has CASp certified individuals on staff knowledgeable of state and federal accessibility laws and
regulations and possesses the expertise necessary to promote access to facilities for persons with disabilities. In
accordance with newly-formed rules and regulations we will supply a CASp certified professional to review plans for
accessibility and win comply with regulations to provkJe a suffteient number of building inspectors who are CASp .
We offer support to municipalities for compliance enforcement and/or developing a transition plan, and successfufly
partner with the disabted community to address the needs and requirements for both entities. We can assist
municipal departments, govemment agencies and local communities to explain various issues relating to access
compliance, such as access compliance obligations, transition planning, construction costs, construction phasing,
codeJiaw 'interpretation,' hardship and code/law changes.
Green Building Standards
Our staff is famHiar with the incorporation of CaiGreen building concep1s into project designs and its potential impact
from the building code. In addition, staff members have participated in the development of various "green• standards
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE6
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' • ' -' --' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -• ~
" " " ~
8
~
~ •
for super adobe, rammed earth, and straw bale construction, to name a few. We have also reviewed straw bale,
stress skin panel, and insulated concrete form constnded homes .
LEED
Developed by the US Green Building Council (USGBC}, LEED provides building owners and operators a framework
for identifying and implementing measurable green buikfmg design, construction, operations and maintenance
solutions. LEED certific:ation consists of a number of different rating systems that apply to many building types-
c:ommereial as wen as residential and measures how wen a building performs across many sustainabiflty metrics
including: energy savings, water effiCiency, C02 emissions reduetioo, improved indoor environmental qualty, n
stewardship of resources and sensitivity to their impacts. Whether your jurisdiction projects are new construction or
renovation, energy effiCient roofing, water run-off management and renewable energy are all important points to
consider, lnterwest helps make it easy .
T24 Energy
Our engineers and plan reviewers are up to date with the new California Energy requirements as they relate to both
new and remodel construction on large commercial projects to small residential additions .
Architectural
lnterwest's non-structural plans examiners furnish plan review services for a vast array of projects including large
commercial, institutional, industrial, retail, OSHPD 3 medical office buildings, and residential projects. Completed
plan review projects range from single-story resldentiaf projects to complex high rise buildings and oomerous but"kfing
additions and remodels.
We are experienced and famifiar with the use and appbtion of the most current additions of the following model
codes:
.·
./ California Code of Regulations, Title 24,
Parts 1 througfl6 and 8 through 7 2
./ International Building Code (IBC)
Structural
./ ANSI Standards
./ NFPA Codes & Standards
Our structural engineers have experience designing and reviewing projects with virtuaRy all building materials including:
~ Wood ~ Concrete
~ Masonry ~ Steel
Our engineers have designed or reviewed a wide array of structural systems including:
./ FEMA Compliant Steel Moment Frames ./ Concrete Moment Frames
<~' Buckftng Restrained Braced Frames Energy <~' Wood ShearwaH Systems
Dissipation Systems <~' Masonry ShearwaN Systems
<~' Eccentric Braced Frames <~' Concrete Shearwa/1 Systems
"" Concentric Braced Frames <~' Ganti/evered Column Systems
<~' Pre-Stressed I Post-Tensioned Concrete
Our structural engineers and inspectors are experienced with the prov;sions of most model codes including current
versions of:
<~' Title 24, Pan 2, Volume 2, California Code
of Regulations (CCR)
./ International Building Code (IBC)
./ ASCEl-10
./ NEHRP
./ AISC 341 & 360
./ ACI
./ FEMA 350, 351 & 353
./ ANSIIAF & PA NOS
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE7
• I
I • I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • " • • • ' • • ' -' " " • " • • " ~
" • .. •
Mechanical, Plumbing & Electrical
lnterwest staff is well versed in the California Mechanical, California Plumbing and the CaHfomia Electrical codes.
We review submitted design documents to ensure compliance with the state codes and any local amendments. We
have made the transition to the newly-adopted codes and currently review for those codes as required. AI staff is
licensed and/or certified in the State of California as well as personnel who hold multiple r~CeMSeS across many
states. We will review submitted design documents to ensure compliance to the current edition of the following
codes:
./ California Building Code ./ California Electrical Code
./ California Plumbing Code ./ Jurisdiction-Adopted Amendments or
./ California Mechanical Code Ordinances
Other review services are provided based on current editions of local or national standards such as:
./ NFPA Standards 13 (automatic fire
sprinkler systems)
./ NFPA Standards 14 (standpipes)
./ NFPA 107 Life Safety Code
Fire Code Plan Review
./ NFPA Standards 20 (fire pumps)
./ NFPA Standards 72 (fire alarms)
./ NFPA Standards 99 (medical gases)
If necessary for Mure projects, experienced, licensed professional fire protection plans examiners are available to provide
services tor the County. Our staff can check plans for compliance with aU applicable fire code and standard requiements,
including but not fimitecl to the following: ICC Fire Code, Unfforrn F'tre Code, California Fire Code, Life Safety Code, NfPA
standards and your local/regional amendments.
BUILDING AND SAFETY INSPECTION
lnterWest tailors inspection services to the particular needs of each client with special attention to providing competent,
consistent service at all levels-at afl times. We select our candidates and identify skiff levels required to best match the
County's inspection goals and philosophy. Alllnterwest inspectors are ICC certified.
lnterwest inspectors can provide the services outlined in the RFP and are flexible based on the needs of the County.
lnterwest staff has performed inspection serv'tces on a wide variety of construction projects including custom homes, larve
residential developments, and commercial, institutional and essential service buildings. We provide valuable experience
gained through successful work with government cients throughout Gafifomia. This clear understanding of the construction
process enables our people to quickly identify and resolve problems both in the office and in the freld.
Assigned staff will perform continuous or periodic construction inspections to verify that the WOf1( of construction is in
conformance with the approved project plans as wetl as identifying issues of non-a>mpliance with applicable building
codes. Many of our inspector candidates can provide dual plan review and inspector services for our clients. When
necessary for large or fast-track projects, multiple inspectors are available .
Staff assigned will contact the Building Official for interpretations, local ordinances, local preferences, alternate materials
and exceptions/alternates to the model codes. They will report directly to the Building OffiCial or other person designated for
an project-related wori(. Inspection issues, if any, which cannot be resolved between the project inspector(s) and contractor
will be forwarded to the Building Official for final resolution.
Inspection personnel assigned will be able to read, understand and interpret Construction plans, truss drawings and
catcutations, prepare and maintain accurate records and reports, COITIITIUilicate effectively orally and in writing and to WOtt
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGES
.. • • • • • • • I
I
I • I
I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~ .. .. ..
effectively with contractors, the pubfiC and general staff. Inspectors wil posses knowledge of approved and modem
methods, materials, tools and safety used in building inspection and the most current building standards .
Integration with County Staff and Departments
As municipal consuttants to many jurisdictions, lnterwest staff is highly adaptive to an processes and procedures and
quickly and seamlessly assimil~ to your specialized requitements. AD personnel are cross-trained in municipal
operations to successfully bridge across departments and are accustomed to partnering, assisting, and coordinating with
Planning, Public Worn, Co(fe Enforcement and other vital County staff and departments.
Inspection Schedule
lnterwest inspectors are familiar with a muftit\lfe of jurisdictional scheduling and tracking systems and can quickly adapt to
County requirements. Inspectors wiD provide inspections for all inspection requests received and win be available \Whirl 24
hours of notffication. Emergency inspections (usually requests that pertajn to a serious or urgent life/safety issue) can be
provided as they are needed (including nights, weekends and holidays) and based on staff avaitabiity, same day service
may be provided. Many of our inspectors are also avatlable to serve at the pubfte counter when needed .
Tools & Equipment
lnterwest provides aU tools necessary for inspectors to carry out duties .
PERMIT PROCESSING SERVICES
lnterwest can provide ICC Certified Permit Technicians to support the front counter and to review and process both
commercial and residential applications for building pennits. The lnterwest Permit Technician will answer questions and
help the general pubf:ic with afl Building & Safety related inquires. lnterwest Consulting Group will furnish exceptionalty
qualified personnel as required for the County's permit counter. AU staff operates as an extension of the County's team,
understands the importance of exemplary customer service, are knowledgeable on the inner-workings of buDding
departments, and are thoroughly familiar with the building application and permit process .
Our Pemut technicians are famiflar with a multitude of jurisdictional scheduling, tracking systems and databases, they can
quickly adapt to the Accela system utilized by the County. Many of our staff are also dual-role employees and can serve as
both inspection and front counter support. Personnel work collaboratively with appficants and have a "can do" attitude to
help resolve issues and minimize anxiety for appbnts. Our permit technician staff will update electronic records and make
. project related database entries as directed by the County .
Permit Technician personnel can provide the following, but are not limited to:
./ Full-Service Front Counter Support
./ Clerical and Technical Support at Permit Counter
./ Resolve Permit/Project Related Issues
./ Permit Processing and Issuance
./ Coordinate with Inspection and Plan Review Procedures
./ Respond to Resident Inquiries
./ Process Public Record Requests
./ Update Reports to Outside Agencies
./ Calculate and Process Permit and Mitigation Fees
./ Prepare Statistical Reports
./ Maintain Records/Storage/Imaging
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE9
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' • • • • •
Section B
Project Deliverables
SUMMARY OF PLAN REVIEW PROJECT DELIVERABLE&
Plan miew deliverable$ ~ist of plan review letters, red-mar1ced drawings, (when requested), completed final drawings,
calculations, energy compliance documentation, specifiCations and other construction documents bearing lnterwest
Consulting Group's approval stamps. Approved documents will be submitted to the County of Fresno for final approval
along with invoices for plan review services provided on an hour1y basis or when requested by the County .
Field inspection defiverables consist of thorough inspections, if needed clearly written correction letters, and data input into
the County's inspection tracking system .
Communicating Plan Review Results
Plan reviews wiD consist of written comments in electronic format as directed by the County. Comment letters will be sent to
the County and applicant at the completion of each review or as directed by the County. _
Specificafty, plan reviews, when not immediately approved, win resuH in lists of comments referring to spec:ific details and
drawings, and referencing applicable code sections. lnterwest \WI provide a clear, concise, and thorough comment list from
which clients, designers, contractors, and owners can wort. Comment lists are delivered to our clients and other designated
recipients (e.g., designers, contractors, owners) via email, FAX, and/or reliable over1and carrier. If requested, lnterwest will
transmit plan review comments and coordinate re-checks directly to the appf~Cant as required and completed plan review
documents ready for approval win be returned to the County for final approval .
Maximum Proposed Turnaround Time for Plan Check
We c:bnsistently complete plan reviews within the timeframes, listed below as our standard business practice. We work hard
to ac:eommodate any tum-around schedule desired by the jurisdiction. Multi-disciplinary reviews are typic8'ly performed in
our offices but we are available for onsite work when required and whenever possible. We wifl furnish the tiered tumaround
shown below. Response time for more complex projects may be negotiated .
Maximum Tum Around Time
Type of Job
First Check Re-Check
New Residential Construction 10 Working Days 5 Working Days
Addition 1 0 Working Days 5 Working Days
Remodel 10 Working Days 5 Working Days
Commercial Construction 10 Working Days 5 Working Days
fnterwest understands that if an assigned plan review project is completed between 1:5 days after the due date, a 10%
reduction of fee will be provided. Additionally, if the plan review is compfeted 5-10 days past the due date, a 50% reduction
of fee will be pnM:jed. Any plan review completed in excess of 10 day late wiR be provided to the County free of cha'ge.
mterwest will notify the County of Fresno at least two business days in advance if a plan review will not be completed with
the stipulated time frame .
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE 10
• • • • • • • I • I • • • I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Meeting Attendance Availability
lnterwest's staff of experienced engineers and plans examiners wilt be available to discuss issues with the County staff,
design team and/or construetion team that may arise on project at no additional fee to the County (projects paid with a
percentage of fees). This includes availability to attend by-monthly plan review and or inspection meetings at the County at
no addttional cost Our staff wiD be available same day for teleconference/phone meetings and within 24 00\lrs for in-
person meetings at the County 0~.
Sub-Consultants .
We will not utlize the services of any sub-consuttants to provide the services requested by the County of Fresno,
.·
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE 11
EXHIBIT C
Section E
Cost lnfonnation
Today's fast-p.:ed development environment demands projects flow quickly and smoothly through the regulatory approval
process. lnterwest Consulting Group fuly understands and is familiar with the procedures and policies that can make this
happen successfully. You'll find our people love what they do and will readily assist with solutions and recommendations
that have been proven, time-tested and are specific to your needs. We propose to assist the County of Fresno with the
services outlined in the Plan Check Packages deftned in the RFP and stated below.
PLAN CHECK PACKAGES:
Plan Review Package .. A"
Complete structural and non-structural commerciaf building plan review
Plan Review Package "B"
Complete non-structural commercial building plan review
Plan Review Package "C"
Complete structural commercial building plan review
Plan Review Package "D"
Complete residential building plan review
Plan Review Package "E"
Complete structural residential building plan review
Plan Review Package "F"
Hourly fee for non-structural plan review services
Plan Review Package "G"
Hourly fee for structural plan review services
Building Inspection Package "H"
Hourly fee for commercial and/or residential building inspection services
Plan Review Package "I"
Hourly fee for site improYement inspection services
Plan Review Package "J"
Hour1y fee for permit processing services
OTHER SERVICES OFFERED
Additional services offered by Jnterwest Consulting Group include fire plan reomw using the catifomia Fire Code, Fire
Inspection, ADA Accessibilty review and inspections, Site and Civil plan review and civil inspections. Fees for these services
can be provided on a time and materials basis or negotiated on a project-by-project basis.
Jnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE25
FEE MATRIX
For plan review and inspection services we propose the following fees for the specified plan check packages and options.
The fees are expressed as a percentage of the plan review fee collected by the County of Fresno or hourty utilizing bitling
rates as specified in the •Schecfu.le of Hourly Biling Rates• shown below .
A ../ ../ ../ ../ 65%
B ../ ../ ../ m
c ../ ../ ../ m
D ../ ../ ../ 65%
E ../ ../ ../ -F ../ ../ ../ Hol.rty
G ../ ../ ../ lbl1y
H ../ ../ Hol.rty
../ ../ Hol.rty
J
Other Services
AU requested services win be performed in whole or in part using one of the plan check service packages established by the
County as defined in the RFP and included above. Plan reviews and Inspections are to include enforcement of an applicable
Federal, State, and Local regulations and por~eies. Fee break downs in each category other than hour1y fees, shall include
the costs of the initial review and all subsequent reviews required to obtain approval for each project. No additional fees will
be charged to complete the services outlined in the packages listed, including but not limited to, pick up, delivery, mileage,
shipping, meetings, phone calls, and other materials, labor and handling. We understand that prior approval by the County
is required for any and aft charges proposed in addition to the percentage agreed to in the plan check packages incUiing
any charges proposed for deferred submittal and revisions that may occur.
lnterwest understands that if a list of comments or approval for an assigned plan review project is returned between 1-5
days after the due date, a 10% reduction of fees will be assessed. Additionally, if the response is 5-10 days past the due
date, a 50% reduction of fees will be assessed. Any plan review project completed in excess of 10 day late wilt be provided
to the County free of charge. lnterwest will notify the County of Fresno at least two business days in advance if any
assigned plan review win not be completed with the stipulated time frame.
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE26
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BIWNG RATES
CLASSIFICATION HOURLY BILLING RATE
Licensed Engineer Building Plans Examiner ............................................................................................. $125
Licensed Engineer Civil Plans Examiner ................................................................................................... $125
Senior Buikfng Plans Examiner ................................................................................................................... $90
Senior Civil Plans Examiner ......................................................................................................................... $90
Fire Plans Examiner I Inspector ................................................................................................................... $95
CASp ............................................................................................................................................................ $95
Permit Technician ............................................................................................................................. $55 to $65
Commercial Inspector ...................................................................................................................... $80 to $90
Residentiallnspector ......................................................................................................................... $65 to $85
Inspection Overtime ..................................................................... 125% of Above Listed Hourly Rates
Mileage: Mileage for inspection services will be charged at the current IRS rate while inspections are being performed.
EXPEDITED PLAN REVIEW SERVICES
We can provide expedited or fast-track plan review services at one and a half times our regular fee. Timeframes for
performance of expedited or fast-track plan review services win be one half of the proposed timeframes identified for
non-expedited projects.
SITI! CIVIL PLAN REVIEW SI!RVICI!S
Site civil plan review services can be provided on an hourly basis and charged per our Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates
shown above.
FIRI! PLAN REVIEW SERVICES
If such services are needed on future projects, fire plan review services can be provided on an hourly basis and charged
per our Schedule of Hourty Billing Rates shown above.
FREE PICK UP & DELIVERY
There is no charge for courier or shipping services, our local Fresno offtee will handle aD pick up and delivery services
for assigned plan review projects.
OTHER CONDITIONS
Revisions, deferred approvals, additional reviews over the initial plan check and two re-checks, etc. will be provided.
INVOICING
lnterwest Consulting wiD provide invoices to the County of Fresno as outlined in the RFP. See Section F of this proposal
for additional details.
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE27
• • t
t
t
t
t
t • t • • t
t • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' -• • • ..
Section F
Invoicing
lnterwest Consulting Group wiR submit an invoice to the County of Fresno with each approved plan review project. The
invoices win include the following infonnation:
• County's Application Number
• Address of Project
• Project Name and Amount Billed for Each
• If performed on an hourly basis, the invoice wiR include each person's name, title, hourly rate and hours being
billed
Where applicable, when the first review is completed and retumed to the County, each project shal be accompanied by a
Fee Calculation Sheet illdicating the amount that will be billed to the County and a breakdown of the associated costs .
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE28
SectionG
Insurance Coverage
As requested in the RFP, lnterwest Consulting Group will provide all necessary insurance coverage to meet the requirements
of the County. A current Certificate of Insurance will be provided upon request.
.·
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. I www.interwestgrp.com
PAGE29
EXHIBIT D
MASTER SCHEDULE! OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECT10N 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECnve %OF
FEE DESCRIPnON INCREASE ADOPTED DATE COlT REFERENCE
2101. B&JIIdlng Canstrucllon Pwmtta 2007.()8 01/04108 <100'1to Qrd, #07-<M8
Incl.
1. Minimum Charge $148.00 a.e:w. Dept.
2. OU. • The following tables ol Costs
consii\IICtian VI[UIIIon shall be Only
used to calcutete bulcllng
pennlt fees: (to determine fee,
multiply footage by appropltlle
valuallan as listed by bulktlng
type, then ntfer lo valuation
IChedUle for fee amount)
TOTAL VAU.IATION
$1·$4.000 $148.00 8..83%
$4,001 -$25,000 $148.00 forlhe first$4,000.00 B~
Plus S18.75 for eaclt additional 8.63%
$1,000.00 or fraction !hereof,
to and Including $25,000.00
$25,001 -$50,000 1499.75 for lhe first $25,000.00 8.63%
Ptus $10.50 for eaclt additional 8.63%
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof.
ta and fncludlng $50,000.00
$50,001 • $100,000 $782.25 for the first $50,000.00 8.83%
plus $7.50 for each additional 8.63%
$1,000.00 or fraction tl'lerlol,
ta and Including $100,000.00
$100,001 • $500.000 $1,137.25 for lhe first $100,000.00 8.1!3%
plus $5.00 for each addll/onal 8.!13%
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,
to and Including $500,000.00
$500.001 and Up $3,137.25 for the first 8.63%
$500,000.00 plus $3.50 for 8.63%
eecl'l addll/onat $1,000.00
or ftacllon thereof
MASTER SCHEDULe OF FESS, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500 .. DEVELOPMENT SERVICEs
FEE DESCRIPTION INCREASE
{CONllNUED)
!TABLE OF CONSTRUCTION VAUIATION
Occupancy and Type
1. Apartment Houus: {FW):
Type lA or I lA 5121.00
TWJe v..MIIsonry, VA IIA $94.00
TypeiHB $103.00
Type V.WOOd Frame or liB & VB w.oo
Type fA-Basement Garage $!3.00
2. Banks, Medical omces & Olllces (8):
Type lA or IIA $143.00
Type lilA or IV $124.00
TypeiiiB $119.00
Type IIA or VA $109.00
Type liB or VB $104.00
3. Cl'lurche8. Funaral Homes and
Crypts (A, 8~
Type lA or IJA $171.00
Type lilA or IV $153.00
Type IIIB $148.00
Type IIA or VA $138.00
Type liB or VB $133.00
4. Ow.lllngs and Day Care Cenlel'S
(With Occupancy Load of 6 or
Len: (R-3) For olher typu
of canM'uclion, use apartment
house vatuallons.
Type V Mnoruy or IIA $117.00
Type V Wood Fmna or liB $97.00
Basements
FiniShed $30.00
Ur1ftnlslled $20.00
YEAR !FFECTIVE '%OF
ADOPTED DATE COST REfERENCE
2(108.09 02117109 100% Ord. 8(19.0()3
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGU, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-OEVEL.OPMENT SERVICES
YEAR iliiFFECTIVE %OF
FEE OESCR1Pl10N INCREASE ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
(CONTJNUED} 2006-o& 02/17108 100% Ord. 109-003
5. HOlela ll1d Motels: (R-1)
Type \A or IIA $147.00
Type lilA or IV $131.00
TypeiJIB $128.00
Type VA or IIA $119.00
TypeVAcrVB $114.00
6. Industrial Plenta, Dehydrators
& Ccld Storage Plants: (S)
Type IAorliA $84.00
Type liB (Stock} $80.00
Type IliA or JIIB $72.00
Type VA $50.00
Type VB $55.00
9. Private Garages, Resldenllal
Accessory Structunls: (U)
Wood Frame Type VB $38.00
Masont'Y Type 11 I $47.00
Frame Pallos Type VB $23.00
Add for Scrllenlng $8.01)
• RDundall to _,.. Sll.!O ror aiii>CUIU less lhln S50D.DD and raunded ro ,_,.,_._\1JI!I for 11rnoun111 ssoo.ao 1ne1grutar. ~012013 3 Ul 311
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECO\IERET.) COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
FEE DESCRIPTION INCREASE
(CONnNUED)
10. Public Garages, Service Slations. Fire Stlltlons
& Farm Shops {8-3, S-4):
Type lA or IIA $68.00
TypeHB $43.00
T)IPIIIIIA $58.00
Type IUB $54.00
Type VA $416.00
11. Restauanla, Aallembly and
Club Bldg5. (A, B);
TypeiAorliA $141.00
Type lilA or lVB $128.00
TypeiiiB $125.00
Type VA $116.00
Type VB $113.00
12. Sloru. Barber ancf Beauty
Shops: (8, M)
Type lA or IIA $104.00
Type IliA or IVB $94.00
Type 1118 $38.00
Type VA $78.00
Type VB $75.00
13. Schools, Pte-S~:hools. 11nd
eay ear. en. (wl Occupaney
Load MOnt Than 8: (E-3)
Type 1A or IIA $158.00
Type lilA or IVB $142.00
TypelllB $134.00
Type VA $125.00
Type VB $120.00
YEAR EFFECTIVE %OF
ADOPTED DATE COST [REFERENCE
2008-01:1 02117109 100% Ord.Q-003
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES. AND RECOVERED COSTS
SEcnON 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
FEE DESCRIPTION INCREASE
(CONTINUED)
15. Thaatars: {A)
TypeiAoriiA $188.00
Type IliA $155.00
TypelfiB $145.00
Type VA $135.00
Type VB $130.00
1 e. Warehouses & Packing Sheds:
(S-1,$-2 & F-2)
Type 1 oriiA $58.00
Type VA $53.00
Type liB or VB $48.00
Type lilA see.oo
Type niB $81.00
nit· up $48.00
17.MIItal Roofstructuras: liB
Residential Patio $16.00
Cover & Carport (U)
Add for Seleenlng $6.00
Commen:ial Slruclures $20.00
Add for Enc10S1JI'8S $11.00
18. Signs (U):
WOCid Frame & Suppol18 VB $11.00
Steel Frame & Supports $23.00
Neon & Ughled Signs $23.00
Slul Columns to Signs $58.00
(Framelllneal foot)
19. Mltcelleneous:
SWimmfrlg Pools $53.00
Fences (Ollar 8' High) $34.00
par lineal fOOl
C.Uie Shellers (Open) $11.00
Deily Barns S36.0D
Y£A1lt EFFECTIVE '40F
ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
200fJ.C9 02117109 100lli 0~#019-003
MASTER SCHEDULe OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 25DO-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EPFECnVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPnON INCREASE ADOPTED DATE COST Re.FERENCE
(CONTINUED) 2008-09 02117/019 100% Ord. 109-003
Agriculture Storage and $28.00
Encloeed Animal Shelters
Pole BllllS $14.00
Structure {Open)
Pole Barns $17.00
8111/ChJte (CIO$ed}
Loading Docks $14.00
WoodOeckt $12.00
Fire Sprinklers $3.00
Other To be determined by
Building of!lclal
NOTE: N • Indicates no lire requirement.
2502. Plan R.vtaw Faas 2(107..()8 01104108 100% Ord. #07..()48
1. Plan review ror qle 86% of building panni!
fllmily & duplex dwellings fee
2. Plan review fee for all 65% of bUilding penni!
other tlnlcturea fee
3. Pfan review for 25% of permit fee
mechanical, ataclrlcal an<flor
plumbing
4. Signs requiring en;ln11rlng 85% of J)ermlt fee
calculatlons
5. Incomplete or chanl)ld plans $72.50 per hour 8.83% 2007-08 01104108 100% Ord. tl07..048
requiring lddltiol'llll plan (Ona hour mlnlmt.fl'l cllsrge)
review
6. Ov«</ma for rustt plan $72..50 per hour 8.83% 2007-o8 01104108 100% On1 #07-G48
review-In addlllon lo standard ('TV«t hour minimum par tradal
review fees.
7. stanctard Plen 8.63% 2007·08 01104106 100% Ord. #07.Q4B
8. Revenlad Plans $99 par hour 8.63% 2007..()8 01104108 100% Old. #07-1)48
(lt1ree hour min. charge)
e. Deferred Plan Sublnlt!als $110.00 per hour 8.63% 2.007.()8 01104108 100% Ord.#07-IM8
10. Plan reMew backoh.ck $62.50 per hour 2007·08 01104108 100% 0n:f.IOT.Q48
In PCeSI of two backchccks {two hour min. charge)
2503. Energy Canaarvallon Surl:harp 2007..(18 10112106 100% Ord. 11'4)8.018
Plan 11111lew on an new
conslructlon subJect to Stale
ol Calif. Energy ConeeNaticn
Raqulramenls
•llluuN!ecl to ftllll'tltl0.80 for amaunl!l lesslllan S6Do.oo and rounded 10 nurul S1.ll0 far amaunra $5(1().00 1nd gru1ar.
4110liZD13 6 of 36
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FeeS, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
FEE DESCRIPnON INCREASE
(CONTINUED)
2104. FH for Work Wllhout Permft
Wade commenced priOr lo Fee as stipulated In Tille 15
illl1.ftlllce of building permits Section 15.04.080(d)
($143.00 minimum charge) 5.27%
2505. Consolldlltad Permit Faa
All n~quiMd permits for eeCI'I Building, Plum bing, Mechanical
building or stnJclln obtained and Eleeldcal pennlts redl.ICIKI
on one eppllcatlon fonn by5%
zsoa. Special SeMces Feu
1. Change of occupancy $287.00 per Slrueture 5.27%
clusJflc:ation
2. lnspllcllan beyond one 5139.00 per Inspection 5.27%
relnspaGtlon (Wolle not ready
for 1st im~pacllon)
3. Special seMt:e lo modify $70.00 perllcur 5.27%
permll applicetiol'l (One hour minimum charge)
4. TemJlOI&l'Y Oecupancy Permit SB2.00 5.27%
5. 11181)eCti0ns request by pennlttee S70.00 per hour or fraction 5.27%
to be made other lhan betwaen theteof
hour& of 8:00AM and 4:00 PM (4 hours mlnlmum charge)
(overtime Inspection)
8. Phone, Fax & E-mail Pennlla $20 acld'ltlonal 5.27%
7. PI'Oc811$lng applfcatlon $1-43.50 additional 5.27%
for an agrwement on e;anpt
siNcbJM under prov\slona
of SecUon 15.04.130
YEAR I EFFECTIVE %OF
ADOPTED DATE COST jAEFERENCE
2007-08 01104/08 100% Ord. 107.048
2007.Q8 01104108 100% Ord.#DN)48
2007·08 011'G4108 100% Ord.I07.()48
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
FEE DESCRJPnON INCREASE
(CONTINUED)
8. Parmar18flt recorda of proJect S19.DD for first sheet 5.27%
drawings required by State 54.25 each addiUonal 5.27%
law to be maintained by sheet
Building Ofticfal
8. Inspection on eleclrical sign S62 additional 5~
not bearing an Unclerwrilers"
Label
10. variance from llood proollns $237.50 5.27%
~irernents of Franc County
Otdirlance No. 818, adopted
June 23, 1981
11. Flood map Wormallon related $42.00 5.27%
to Federal Emergency Mgmt
Agency (FEMA) flood lnsuranc:e
rate lnfofmallon
12. Reeearcl'l records and PltiYide $14.50 PIU8 prtnling costs 5.27%
Information for eJCiSiin!l
parrnhs,p~.sapUcand
cu. rellltwd recorda
13. Review deedS and other $74.25 5.27%
related docuneniS for
legality of pan::el$
prior to lssunmce of permits
14. Wtttten conformallon of $42.00 5.27%
zoning to determine that a
proposed uu 'Will be allowed
15. Service fee for mnlng S5.75eacl1 5.27%
ordinance excerpts
YEAR EPFEC11VE %OF
ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
2007-oe 01104108 100% OnL 107-G4a
MASTER SCHEDULE OF PEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2&00-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECTIVE 'lit OF
FEE DESCRIPTION INCREASE ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
(CON'nNUED) 200'1'·08 01104108 100% Ord. to7-o48
16. Ra·rooflng ot existing
buildings Including pre-roof
inspection
a. Single family resldenlial $179.001sttuclure 5.27%
b. All other SINCWres $179.00 far first 5,000 sq. II 5.27%
plus $145.SO for each addTtlonal 5.27%
5,000 sq. ft or fnlotlon thenlof
per structure
17.0amaga lnvesUgaliotl $93.00each 5.27%
18. Pracuslng fee for colrectlon $17.SOeach 5.27%
and dlslributlon of a fee for
others
111. Flood certmcate $78.25 per certlfleate 5.27%
20. Projects located In State $39.00 per slructure 5.27%
Responsibility Areas
21.1nstalladon of priva1e
swimming pool or spa lrtcludes
structural, plumbing and
eleclltcal
1L lngtOUnef Pool or Spa $455.50 5.27%
b. lngiO\B'\Cl PaoiiSpe Combination $500.00 5.27%
c. AI:MMt ground Pool or Spa $136.50 5.27%
d. Add for Gas Hut $138.50 5.27%
22. Natural Haarcl Dlec:Josure $78.00 per parcel 5.27%
lnformaton
23.Account AdmJnlstraUon $8.00 per transaction 5..27%
24. Wotkers Cornp. Insurance $7.50 per lnlnsactlon 5.27%
Administration
25. Delemllnlltlon ot Mergllr $212.00 5.27%
With AeJpeal (add) $141.50 5.27%
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SEC110N BOO-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
'VEAR EFFECTIVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPDON INCREASE iAooi'TED DATE COST REFERENCE
(CONnNUED.
2507. ReJOCidlon Permit Fees 2007..08 01/04/0B 100% Ord. #07.o48
1. Building permit, relocated Twice stanclerd fee far work
struclures described in pennlt
2. lnvestigallon pennll
a. lnskkt Fresno County $299.00 per structure 5.27%
b. Outside Fte&TIO County $299.00 per struclure 6.27%
+ S.48.S mi.lper structure
+$70.00 hr./per stNclure 5..27%
2508. Wrectdng or Demontlon Fns 2007-QS 01104108 100% On:l.t07..048
1. Single family residanUal $118.00 per structure 5.27%
struc.t\Jres
2. All olhllr structures
a. First story-to 5,000 SQ ft $116.00 per slructlll'8 5.27%
b. Each 8ddllional1.000 sq ft 522.00 per slrUcture 5.27%
c. Elich story above 112 of ree far 1st s!Oiy
3. Septi!; System not aasociatecf $113.25 per structure 5.27%
wi1h 1he demalltlon of a
struc.t\Jre.
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
VI!AR
FEE DESCRIPnON INCREASE ADOPTED
(CONTINUED)
2509. MobUa Home Occupancy and Accessory
8tructum, Mobile Harne Parks,
Special Occu,.ncy Traf1er and
Recreefion Vehicle Parks, and
Campground Fees
1. Permit ISsuance $38.00 5.27% 2007-<18
2. InspectiOn beyOnd 01111 $139.00 per flllnspactlon 5.27% 2007·08
1'8inspec!Jon
3. Lot ~ration for Mobile $237.50 per mobile home 5.27% 2007·08
Home, RV, and Commercial Coach
(Ooes not inclUde pnvale seplic
system)
4. lll$talll1ticln ot Mobile Home $187 .so per Gite 5.27% 2007.()8
5. Sepllt System l'or Mobile Home, $148.50 par system 5.21% 2007-08
RV and Commercial Coach
8. Ac=ssory structures Including Fees as set forth for 2007.08
Cabanas, Ramadas & Genlges ConvtmUonal construction
2510. Mechanical Code F .. 2007.08
1. lulling eaeh penni! $38.00 5.27%
2. Replacement, repalrar
installallon or each heatlnu
&J)Illlanca or flue vent $38.00 5.27%
3. Exhaust Hoods
a. lnslallallon of a $38.00 5.27%
gnwlty system venlirelkm
duct with or vdttMiut hoocl
screens In a commercial ar
lnslftU1lomll facftlly, not
ll8t\lln; a commercial kitchen
• Rounded ID naarat 10.60 liCr amamta lesalhlln $500.00 and JVundad to nni'UI Sl.!!Q ror amaunl& ssoo.oo ana QtNtar
tlf1012013 11 Of 3tS '
EFFEC11VE %OF
DATE COST REFERENCE
01104/0B 100% Onf. #D7-G48
01104108 100% On1#07.04B
01f041D8 100% Ord. #07.048
01/04J08 100'1\ Ord. 107.048
01.104108 100% Old. #07-1)48
01/04108 100% Ort1107-1)48
01104/08 100% Ord. #07-o48
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECTIVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPnON INCREASE ADOPTED DATE coar REFERENCE
(CONTINUED) 2007-()8 01104108 100% On:l. #al.o48
b. lns1al!atlon of a
venlllatlon duct v.fth a forced
air (meel'leM:al) system
Including hOOd duct In a
commardal, lnduslrlal,
lnstllutlonal or ntlaled
facility
1. Each syll8m under 4,000 $38.00 5.27%
C.F.M.
2. Each ayetem OYel' 4,000 54&00 5.2'7%
C.F.M.
4. lnslalladon of a gas
piping system
a. 1 to 5 au11ets $29.00 5.27%
b. For each Bddllcl'llll outlet $5.25 5.27%
5. All fireplaces and S72.50ach 5.27%
IIIICh appliance or smoke slack
go-v.nec! by Code,
not classad as a speclftc
heating appllolnce
8. Comfort Cooling lnslaQa!lons:
a. Each comfort eooftng $11.75 5.27%
wlndowunlt
b. Eactl comfort cooling $38.00 5.27%
system less lhan 7 tons
c. Each comfort ccoltng $52.00 5.27%
system 7 t01111 to 14 tons
• AowiCied 1o n...-$0.50 l'llr 1m011111s ltss1Nin $800.00 8lld roondad 10 nartiii1.GO fur amaunll SSOO.DD and f11'81111Jr.
41tMD13 12 or 36
MASTER SCHEDUlE OF FEES, CHARGES, ANO RECOVERED COSTS
SEcnON 2880-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
FEE DESCRIPnON INCREASE
{CONTINUED)
d. Each comfort cooling S86.00 5.27%
system over 14 tons
e. Eactl comfort cooing gas $38.00 5.27%
absorpllon system to
130,000BTU
f. Each comfort cooling gas $52.00 5.27%
ebeofptfan syatem 130.000
BTU to 370,000 BTU Input
g. Each comfort cooling gas $88.00 5.27%
abtlcrpNon system 370,001
anct gtlUIIer, uch unit
h. Comfort eoolillg & heall,._g
ductsySlam
1) Single Story-floor.,_
a. o to 4,000 IICI. ft. 529.00 5.27%
b. Over 4,000 IICI. ft. $58.DD 5.27%
2) Multf·story, per floor $29.00 5.27%
7. Mecl'lanical lnstaDallon
a. New construcUon or complele
remodel of Single or multi-family
dwalDngs. (fee Includes
duct work, reglslera, healing and
cooling equipment but not melat
fireplaces. gn piping
or fireplaces).
YEAR EFFEC11VE %OF
ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
2007.0S 01104108 100% Old. #07.o48
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECnDN 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAfi( EFFECTIVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPTION INCREASE ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
(CONTINUED) 2007-08 01104/08 100% Ord. #07.()48
1. o 10 750 eQ. ft. of area S23.001dwelffng 1.111it 5.27%
at construcllon
2. 751 to 1.500 sq. ft. of $52.00/dwelllng 1.1111t 5.27%
aree of consii'UOtlon
3. 1,501 to 2.500 sq. ft. of $80.00/dwetlfng l.llit 5.27%
area of conslrucllcn
4. Over 2501 sq. ft. of area, $5.25/dwelllng 5.27%
for each eddllional 500 sq.
ft. or fract1on I hereof,
add 10above
7b. Motel un!W wtlhout kitchen 75% of fee schedule 2007·08 01/04/08 100% On:l. lft)7-o48
fac:lltles 2510 (7a}
8. Evaporative Coolers 2007-(18 01104/08 100% Ord. fH)7 .()48
e. Each aeparate cooling tower $51.00 5.27%
b. Evaporative coolers $.51.00 5.27%
G. Special service for S70.00 per hour 5.27%
Investigaton to determine COne hour minimum chllfge)
oompf'11111ce of a system
w!Ulltle code n=quirements
or to errect a correolicn
or repair to en elliltinQ
system not COIIered by a
spiCiflc schedule.
10. Minimum Fees: :ZOD7.Q8 01/04108 100% Ord..0Nl48
a. The mlnlrru.ln macnantcal $61.00 5.27%
pennltfft
b. The minimum mecl'lanical permit $116.00 5.27% ree for all fllructures to be
ralocltad
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500 -DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EA=Eenve %OF
FEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
{CONTINUED)
2511. Electrical Code Fns 2007.08 10112106 100% OrcU08·018
1, Eleclr1callnsta1181iona
a. New cons1rucl!on or complete remodel 2007-os 01104108 100% Otd. 1#07.()48
of single or mullf..famlly
dwalllngs (fee Includes all
11\otrtng. ouaets, ftldutes, one
200 amp max. main service
and one 200 amp max. sub penal,)
1)0 -7SOtq. ft. 5110.60 per dwelting l.lllt 2007-o8 01104JD8 100% Ord.I07o04B
2) 751·1,000 sq. ft. $139.00 per dwelling unit 200NI8 01104108 100% On1. #07·048
3) 1,001 -1 ,500 aq. ft. $199.60 per dwelling unit 2007-oa 01104J08 100% Ord. to7-o48
4) 1 ,501 -2,000 sq. ft. $257.50 per dwelling unit 2007-oe 01/D4JD8 100% Ord.#07-048
5) 2,001 • 2,500 sq. ft. $315.50 per owelQng unit 2007-(18 01104J08 100% Ord. t07-048
8) 2.501 -3.000 sq. ft. $373.00 perdwelfing unit 2007-o& 01104108 100% Qrd. #07<048
7) Each addlUonal 500 sq.ft. $33.25 per dwelllng unlt2 2007.Q8 01104J08 100% Ord. t07-o48
b. Motel units ~ut 75% of fee schedule 2511 (1a) 2007.08 01104108 100% Ord. f07.o48
ldk:henfacmies
2. lssung permits $38.00each 2007·08 01104108 100% Ord. #07-o48
3. Wiring outlets $1.60 each 2007·08 01104108 100% Ord. #07.()48
4. Eadl c:iroult $12.00 each 2007..()8 01104JOS 100% Ord. #07-D48
(remodel work only)
fl. Each motor 2007-D8 01104J08 100% Ord.#0?-048
a. 0·1 HP $12.00each
b. Over 1 HP • 5 HP $33.50each
c. Ovar5HP-30HP $42.00 each
d. Over 30 HP ·50 HP $64.00each
e. Over 50 HP ·100 HP $104.00 each
f. Oller 1 DO HP· 160 HP $161.50 each
g. Over150HP $181.50 each+ $57.00 for
each 60HP or ll'acllon !hereof
over150HP
'RounCied to nearut $0.50 for amounts less lllen SGao..OO end rouncfld to neerul $1.00 for amounts SSOD.OO and !lmlllr.
411012013 15 of 36
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECTIVE
PEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE
(CONTINUED)
e. Each transformer: 2007-08 01104108
a. 0·1 KVA $12.00 each
b. Over 1 KVA -5 KVA $33.00eech
c. Over 5 KVA-30 KVA $42.00each
d. Over 30 KVA-50 KVA $134.00 eaCh
a. Over 50 KVA-100 KVA $104.00 each
f. Over 100 KVA • 200 1<:1/A S1 81.50 each
g. Over 200 KVA $161.50ea + $57.00 for each
200 KVA or fraction thereof
over200KVA
7. Each agrlcullural pump arwlncl $116.00 each 2007-08 01104/08
maChine motor {minimum fee)
8. Mo\ling of motors 75% of fee required 2007-08 01104108
for new equipment
9. Each exterior lighting standald 200MB 01104108
a. First 4 standards $23.00each
b. Over 4 standards $14.50 each
10. Each range, dishwasher, waste $20.25 each 2007·08 0110410B
dl9posal. water heater.
heater, dl)'8r. orwetdar
Installation or otl'ler single
ouUet circuit
11. Tempol'l!lry Qghls In buDding $38.00each 2007-oa 01104108
In fie cowse of c::onstnJdlon
or undergoing repairs cr
similar LJSe
'Aioundad ID na.,_ $0.aD lor III'IOUIIh la&alhan $500.00 and roundld 10 ll*ar'llt $1.00 filr amounts $600.00 and gllllller.
411012011! 16 of 38
%OF
COST REFERENCE
100% Ort:l.t07-o48
100% Ort:I.#07-o48
100% Crt:!. to7-048
100% Ord.#ONl48
100% Ord. 107.()48
100% Crt:!. #07-o48
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECTIVE
FEE DESCRJPnoN FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE
(CONTINUED)
12.1ncandeacent electric sign or 2007.()8 011041'08
outline lighting of luminous
gas type 'With:
a. 1 to 4 !ransfon'nllfB $62.50 each
b. addillona11ransfurmars $6.00each
13.1.unfnous gas type fixture $12.00 each 2007-()8 01104108
'With transformer (except
fluorescent type)
14. X..ray unit and lts $62.51) each 2007-()8 01104108
appurtenances
15. Service andforsub..penel; 2007-D8 01104108
a. For 0 -200 amps $29.00each
b. For 201 • 400 amps $96.00each
c. For 401 • 600 amps $148.50 eaCh
d. 601 amps 1D 1600 amps $295.50 each
e. OYer 1600 amps $295.50 each + $29.00 for each
200amps of fraction !hereof
over 1600amps ea
16. 11me Clock $12.00eactr 2007·08 01/04108
17. Elec1rfc valve $5.50 each 2007-D8 01104108
18.1nspection of any alec1rlcat $71.50 per hour 2007..()8 01104J08
equipment v.ttere no fee Ia (One hour minimum charge)
herein prescrfbed, for the
lime ccnaumed.
•Aounded 1D nnnlll $0..!10 for MIOIIIIIS leiS than $500.00 and nxmdad to neiM'IItl $1.00 for amoon111 SSOO.OO and oreater.
<4110/3013 17 of 36
%OF
COST REFERENCE
100% On:l. #07.()48
100% Ord. 1107·048
100% On:!. #07·048
100% Ord.#07·048
100% Ord.to7·048
100% Ord. #07·048
100% Old. #07-()48
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 25GO-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECTIVE
FEE DESCRIPnON FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED
(CONnNUED}
19. Minimum fees: 2007-llB
a. ll.tnlmum eleclrical permit fee $58.50 minimum fee
b. Minimum electical permit $97.00 minimum
fee for au siJ\Icii.Jres
lo be re4ocaled I
c. Eleclrical pemtlt fee. $116.50 minimum
agriCultural pump or wind
motor
21112. Plumbing Code Fees 2007·08
1. Alteta1ion. repair or addition $71.50 each
of a drain or waste nne
2. Pre-sewer Inspection $71.50 each
3. Change fn exis!Jng sepUc 590.50 eedl instanaUon
tanks by fhe addition of
dralnflelds or seepage pHs
or to replace septic tanks.
4. Con~rslon of a single family $124.50 per sln.ICtul'e
cfwelDng from liquid
pelroleurn gas to natural gas
5. C811fflcatlon of an on·slte $148.5 each
sewage disposal system
8. Gas appliance or vent $38.00eech
7. Gas Piping Systems
a. Gas pfplng S)'Stem other $29.00 each system
1han on-site mains. First 5
outle!S.
b. Each additional cllllat $5.50 each
B. lnspeellon of any plumblnfll, $71.50each
which no fee Is preacrtbed
·~undl4 to l1ftl1let SO.SO for lmGuniS Ja~&lhan .SSOO.OO and toundad Ia ....-$1.00 for iiiiTIDUnle S5CJO.OO and gn~~~Aer
<411012013 18of36 .
DATE
01104108
01/04108
%OF
COST REFERENCE
100% Old. #07·048
100% Ord.I/I07.o43
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECTlVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
(CONTINUED) 2007.08 01104108 100% Ord. to7..()4t
9. Installation of any gas device:
(poultry operaUons only)
a. Gas piping &)!Siem $58.50each
b. Gas devlc:es:
1. 1st 5 devices $12.00 each
2. Additional devices $5.50each
10. Issuing permit $38.00each
11. Bacldlcw Preventkln
a. l.alNI'I sprinkler system for $58.50each
single family dwellings in
v.tlk;h a backflow
pratecffve device or davl01111
Bn!llnstalled
b. All other backftow devices $29.00 eaCh
12. Minimum Fees:
a. Mlnlmum plumbing permit fee $58.50aach
b. Minimum plumbing permit fee $97 .OD each ror all structures to be llllccated minimum fee
13. Plumbing lnslallations
a. New construction or complete
remodel of Single or rnultl·famHy
dwallfngs up to 3 bathrooms.
{Includes struclura, gas, M.tar,
vwaste and miscellaneous piping
aystemund all plumbing flxturas.)
1. one ba!lv'ccm $179.00 '* dwemng unit
2. TVIO balhmams $238.50 per dwalllng unit
3. Three balhrooms $262.50 per dwelling unit
Each additional ftldure $29.00 per bathroom ftxlure
over 3 bathrooms
b. Motel Units wilhout l<ik:hen 75% of schedule 2fi12 {13a)
Faclll1ies
2007.()8 10112108 100% 0«1.106-018
'Rounded to ll88l8lll SO..SO far arnocmts 181JIIlln S50D.GO and RJUndeclto naarett S1 .DO ror amaunls S!DO.OO al!d grealtr.
411012013 19 of 36
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECTIVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTE1l DATE COST REFERENCE
(CONTINUED}
1.4. On-site piping. Includes 2007-DB 01104108 100% Otd.I07..o48
sewer, water, gas.
a. First 100 feet $89.00
b. Each addlllonat 100 n. $5.50
15. On-site BIIWBr manhole $11 e.oo each
18. Plumbing fixture or set of $29.00eacn
ftxtures on 1 trap Including
water drainage piping and
beckftow protecllon
17. Rainwater S)'Stem (Roof drain) $20.00 eact!
18. Septic S)IStems
a. Sepllc tank JnslallaUOn $148.50 each
Including seepage plls or
drain fields
b. Test hole inspecllon wl1h $62.00Jinspeclion
sepllc tank pennlt
c. Test hole Inspection and $96.00Jlnspec11on
malntel'lance of ntCDTds when
building or sep11c perrnlls
not taken out
d. Small lot lnspecllon $62.00 per lnspecdon
19. Water piping ~m
on-site mains.
a. First 5 ouuats $29.00 each s•m
b. Each additional outlet $5.50each
'floundM 10 M8l'llllt S0.50 far amounts !au lllln S!DO.OO and IOUIIIted 10 ntlr.SI $1.00 for amouniS $1500.00 and 1J1118lar.
4ftct.l2013 20 of 36
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECTIVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
(CONnNUEO)
2514. Refllnds 2007..()8 100% Ord.#92..013
If conslnJction has not commenced, a refund of 80% of ltle
permit fee \\fll be allowad where lhe permit Is canceled at
lhe request cf lhe permittee, wlhln 1 eo clays from date of
Issue. No permit fae will be refunded I
for any permit which has expired. When lhe plan review sarvice
has been pedonned, no refund wiD be made of the plan review
fee. All requeS!S for refund must include a sratement in
wrlllng containing the rwsons for lhe request
21115. Water Pump Test
1. Water Pump Test Fee $212.00 eacll 2007..()8 01/04108 100% Orct.#07·048
2. 11-H Hydro Study Test Review $267.00 each 2008-09 02/17109 100% Ord#09-003
2560. Land Development Permits and Procaufng 2007.08 01104JD8 100% Qrd.f07·048
1, Amendma"lt application With $7.552.00 each
concurtent misc. O.R.A.
2. Amendment application wllh
COI'liCIJII"entCUP
a. Unclaeslflecl CUP $12.240.00 eadl
b. Classlfled CUP $8,501.00 each
3. Amendment appncatlan '!Mih $7,008.00 each
concurrent realdenllaf D.R.A.
'RounciiCI to nearalll $0.!50 far amauntllan Uta11 S50D.QO lnclta&mded 1o ntNiralll S1.00 lar amOUIU S5DO.Cl0 tnci~~JNitr.
411012013 21 of 36
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFfiECTNE
FEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE
(CONTINUED) 2007-oa 01104108
4. Amendment to text $7,326.00 eactl
5. Condlllonal Use Permit (CUP)
a. Unc:lassllled $9,123.00 each
b. Classified $4,569.00 each
c. Revision 25% of !he CUP Fea 2007-oa 01J04108
6. Conditional Use Pennit 2007-<18 01J04JOB
application with concurrent
variance
a. Uncluslfied CUP
1 • WI'Ciass I VAR $10,724.00 each
2. wfClass II VAR $12,152.00 each
b. Classlfled CUP
1 . 'oldCiass I VAR $8,189.00 each
2. tMC!ass II VAR $8,327.00 eac:h
7. ConUnuance of noticed $4n.ocaach
public hearing
8. Dfrector Review and Approval
(ORA)
a. Residential ORA lndudes day $1,570.00 each
care facJRIIes (In-home),
home beauty shops, end other
uses secondary to residential use
b. Misc. ORA Includes oammercial. $2,660.00 each
Industrial end all other
appllcaaons subject ID ORA
c. Revision 25% of the ORA Fee 2007-DS
"Roundad to neiiUt $D.Ii0 b amou.-leulhln saoo.oo anc1 ~~:~uldtd 10 n81ntll $1.00 ror amounts $800.00 anc1 gntalllr.
41f01:l013 22 of 36
%Of
COST REFERENCE
100% Ord.IONl48
100% Ord.I07-048
100% Ord. to7..Q.48
100% Ord. 1194-015
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECnON 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERV1CE8
. YEAR EFFECTIVE
FEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED
(CONTINUED} 2007·08
9. MI110r Var1ance $1,613.00 eacn
10. Misc. ORA with concurrent
variance
a. Class I VAR $4,535.00 each
b. Class II VAR
I
$7,379.00 each
11. PnHtppllcallon report $924.00 each
Fee paid for a pre-appllca11on report Shall be deduclsd
from lhe CUP, Variance or Amendment AppllcaUon fee.
12. Resklen11al ORA with
concurrent variance
a. ClassiVAR $3,990.00 each
b. Class II VAR $6,835.00 each
13. Tentaflva tracts (TT)
(&lbdlvlllon maps)
a. Rrst 40 low $4.490.00 Ba&e plus
$457 .OOJiot
b. Next 351ots $229.00/lot
c. Next 7510Ui $116.00/iot
d. Next 150 lc1& $72.50/lot
e. Next 300 lois $61.00 !lot
f. Over 600 lots $46.50 Jlot
g. Revision 25% of T.T. fee
14. Variance (VA)
a. Classl: $3,204.00 each
OevlaUons from the following slandards
1) Lot slzea, dimensions & frontage
(except rural, resldenUal and
agricultural dlslrlcts)
'Aoundld 1D nttan11t $0:.50 for 81110Uft111Hslllan 1500.00 and rounded io ~ 11.00 rot amoonla $500.00 al1d gnsldllr:
41'101201! 23 of 36 ·
DATE
01104J08
%Of
COST REFERENCE
100% Ord.#07~
MASTI!R SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECnYE %Of
FEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
(CONTINUED) 2007-oB 01/04J08 100% Ord.#07·048
2) Selbacks (except tennis courts)
3) Fence and wall requirements In
residential districts
4) PaJklng 11anderdS for single·
family residential dlslrk:1s
S)Signs
b. Class IT: $6,049.00 each
Oevi811ons from lhe following standards·
1) Oensity slandards
2) SWimmina poollocallons
3) Fence and waD requirements In
non-n~Sidantlal districts
4) Tennis eotsrts
5) Ughtlng
6) Parking In non-residentJar and
mutti-famlly dlslr1Cis
n Building hetght
8)Lotcoverage
c. Revision 25% of the V.A. Fee 2007.08 100% O!ti. #94-015
15. Subdl\ll&ion axcepllcns $697.00 2007-os 01104108 100% Ord. #07-G48
tt!CIUI'dad Ia neiiUI SO.tltl l'or amounta rea tlllll $500.00 and IOIIIICfed 10 nurest $1.00 lbr amoun11 $500.00 and graalaf.
411012013 24 or 38
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFf&CnVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE C08T REFERENCE
(CONTINUED) 2007-QB 01JD.t/OB 100% Ord. ID7.Q48
16. Procasslng misc. clocuments $243.50
(agreemerns, ocnvenants and
dafermenls)
17. Preliminary subdivision $1.830.00
18. Zoning division amendment (AA.) $6,214.00
a. Revision 25% of the A.A. Fee 2007-08 100% OnU94-01!5
19.8. VA&CUP 25% of application fee 2007-08 100% Ord. #98-tlOB
b. TT 25% of application fee 2007-08 100% Ord. #98-tlOB
20.0ELETED 2007..()8 ons. tae-ooe
21. Formation of new agriculture $374.00 2007-QS 01104108 100% On2. f07-o48
PI'888TV88
22. Trart&mlsslon line f811few per $7,739.00
Secllon 875 of Zoning Ordinance plus mailing costs
23. Malllng list preparaUon-mlsc. Actual cost
24. Requests for administrative $243.50
1'81/iew of apprcved proJeciS
25. Agricultural land
a. Contracts $184.00 2007-QS 01104108 100% Ord. 107-048
b. cancellations $3.290.00 2007-CIB 01104108 100% Ord. #07-Cl48
c. Revisions $3'74.00 2007-QB 0110008 100% Ord. #07..()48
28. Erwlronmentai Review $259.00 200'7..09 01/04108 100% Ord. ti07-G48
"fCccunded lo naallltt $0.ti0 f'or amouniS 11M than SSOO.OO and R1lmlled to ne.resc S1.0D for 1moun111 $500.00 and ~r.
411012013 25 of 36
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECTIVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
(CONT1NUED) 2007-CJ8 01/04/08 100% Ord. #07-048
27. Environmental Assessments
(Initial Studies)
a. Class 1 Asaeasrnanls for {U) CUP's $15,151.00
and Genel'al Plan Amendments
b. Cblss II Asaessments for Amendments $3,901.00
Appftcations, (C) CUP's, Tentative
Tracts, Amendments to Text, and Non-
residential ORA's
c. Class Ill Asaessrnanls for ResldenDal $1.212.00
CRAs, Variances, Tentallve Parcel
Maps.. Parcel Map Waivers and other
Pltllec!B not requiring land use
clearance but subject 1o CEQA.
d. Revision 25%offee 2007-oa 100% Ord..l92.013
28. General plan conformity findings seeo.oo 2007-()8 01104/DB 100% On:U07-o48
29. Applfeant request for conUnuance $142.50 2007-<18 01104108 100% Ol'd. #07-o48
30.1denllcel projec1 resubmttlttd Ac1ual costs (full fee when 2007..()8 100% Old. #95-015
after Mardl19, 1991, and wntlln med. Difference reimbursed
one year Initial submission or after aCIUal cosiB determined.)
reprocessed as a result of llflgat!On.
31. Poultry Faclllly Permit $1,721.00 2007-oa 01/04108 100% Ord.I07-D48
32. Appeal of Decision tD the $508.00 2007-QB 01104/08 100% On:f. #07-1)48
Board of Superytsors or
Planning Commission
33. Reclamation Plan $4.298.00 2007..08 01/D4J08 100% Ord. «l7-o48
Over11me
a. Analyst $85.00 per hour
b. Cleltoal $52.50 per hour
•fCounded to 18811!18\ SO.SO for amouniS less thin $!00.00 and tOUnCied to n1a11111 $1.00 far amaunta S5DO.OO and llll!llllr.
-411"012013 26 of 36
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TEAR CFJ"eCTIVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
34. Amendment to VA. CUP, ORA, & AA
a. Modify condition{s) of approval 50% of current fee 2007·08 100% Old. WB-008
b. Up to 50% expansion of lhe cuJTent 50% of current fee 2007..08 100% Old. teB-006
usefaciMtyViflhfn lha axfsllng appllca!lon
permit area
35. Land Use Permit Violations 35% Surcharge on 2007-08 10112106 100% Ord. 1106-018
applicable application fee
36. Pre-Appllca1ion Review $247.00 2007..08 01104108 100% Ord. fl07-048
Fee lo be c:redlted If appllcallcn ftlecl
'lllflhin six monlhs
37. Mitigation Compliance Monitoring S71.50 per hour 2007.08 01/04108 100% Ord. fl07-048
38. No Shoot and/or Dog Leash Law Area $1,635.00 2007.08 01/04108 100% Ord. 107-()48
Oeslanatlon
"Rounded Ia nnralt $0.50 for amounts rna than S!OD.OO •nd IWIICied to nearalt 51.00 far amauru 1500.00 1nc:t or-tar.
411012013 27 of36
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED coaTS
SEC110N 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EPI'EClM!
F!l! DI!SCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOP~D DATE
(CONTINUED)
251'0. Dwelopmellt &nafneertn; Pflllltts
~nlf Praceaetng
1. Ten111lv1 Parcel Map $1,5112.00 baiJUil 2006-1'}7 101121011
plus $33.00/p.etrcal
a. Revision 25%ofFee 19113-94
2. Tlllltllllv. Parcel Map Wlliller $1,158.00 base 20DIHI7 10112106
11M S24.50Jparctl
•· Rlwitlon 25%ofFee 1993-94
3. Propeny Ll,.. Adjustment $1,0SO.OO 2008-07 10fi2/0il
•• Revision 25'1lofFee 1993-114
4. Pre-epplteatlon for certmcate of $1,158.00bese 2008-07 10112/011
compllnce plus $24.50/parcel
a. RaYialon 25%ofFee 1993-94
5. Pr.IPplicaUon for celti-$717.00 blse 2008-07 10112106
t1c:ate of complianca for plus 521.00/percel
Ull-mergu
7. Tlmeal'"*'"forTenlallve $32D.DD 2008.C7 1GI12108
Parcel Mapa
8. Wll'lll Clr1illca18 SM2.00biH 21J01!.()7 1011Z'Ofl
PIUS $74,50/parcel
a. Revlalon 25%ofFea 19&4-95
%OF
COST REFERENCE
100% Ord.M-018
100% Old. ....015
100% Old. Qo018
100% Old. ft4.01S
100% 0Rl.ro&018
100% ORI.I94415
100% Ord. «111418
100% Ord. f84.015
100% Ord.IOB-018
100% Ord. 108-018
100% Ord. 105-018
100% Old. IVI4-016
MAST!R SCHEDULE OF FI!!S, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
S!CTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECTIW %01'
FEE OESCRIP110N FUAMOUNT ADOPTED DATE COST REF!RI!NCE
(CONTINUED I
9. Map l'lhllaklr1.9 fees
a. Record of SIIIV8y S543.00 lnlllal map 2008-09 021'171011 1001\ Ord. toa.ao3
plus S230.50fshlet over 2 &heats
Plus Sr. Eng. Rate: $72.12JIV.
(mln. 2 hrs.)
Back Checl! Afler Two
b. Pareel m!IP $4.292.00 bese 2008·D7 10112106 100% Ol'd. t.lll&-011
plus $127.00/pareel
c. Final map $4.688.00 base 2008-07 10112#0& 100% On:UOB-011
plus 1st 50 rots $233.00/lot
Nllll 25 lots $118.t110Jtot
Over 75 la!S $57.50 J1ot
d. Revisions 15% ol Chldtlng Fee 1995-98 100% Old. M-006
a. AllemiUve l'8e for prc)ec.11 Wltrl 100% actvat cost cfe!IOII1 equal to 1998-99 Old. 198-006
es1lmllted cans!IUctlon costs faes lfated In 2510.9.C.
greater ll:lan $5.000.000.
10.Imprcwement plail'lll-check!~
and l'ntpiCIJon fea (basad on
ea1Mnated gonsiM:llon costs).
a. Site pllfll S!S76.00 Blse Plus 20011..07 10112108 100% Ord. toll-018
8% 1ittt sso.ooo
5% nezt $200,000
4% ntM $750.000
3% next $1,000.000
Checltlllf Fu
$578.00 Base plus
25% of lola! fee OYII' $578.00
b. Ofhat plent (maTJt, lie.) 55.824.00 Base ptus 2006.c7 10112.108 100% Ord.IIIQ8.018
&.5% first $50,000
13% next 1200,000
8% nm $7SO.ODO
8% I'IIIXt $1.000,000
4% next $4.000.000
2% amount over $&.000,000
Chedclng Fee 35% of lo111fee 1!.1!.14-95 100% 0111.~15
c. Altemaltve fee 100% 11C1Ual COJ1s• 1995-96 Ord.lllll-018
for ptOJects wllh esi!IM\ed construc-Depotlt eq1111t lo fees
lion COlis grealar ~ $5,000,000 fisted In 2570.10.8
Nate: Applicant may ntquelllhat plan
c11ec1c1n0 and rnapeclkll'l servfoes
be parfonnad by qualltltd consullant
Under CIOI'Itnlel to County.
MASTI!R SCHI!DtJLE OF FEES, CHAROES, ANtl RECCM!RI!D COSTS
SICTIOM 2500-DJ!V!LOPMI!NT S!RVIC!S
YEAR EJIFI!:cnY! %0P
FEe DESCRIPTION FeE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE COST RI!FE!RENCI!
(CON11NUI!D)
11. Agreements for subdlvialcn &
Sill plan MIII&Wl
(prept,.tlon & administration)
a. All ProJects .8 % eat. const. costs 1995-96 Ord.l96418
b. Altematille fee 100% ac1Ual costa• 1995-96 Otd.I'96-0t6
for p!Of«:ta with esllmated conslruc-Deposit equal to fees
lion ccs.1S graalllt than S5.0DO.OOO listed in 2570.11.11.
. ACIUII cost Includes County 118ft and OIJIJside service costs plus the rUII range of currem
ovemllld charges and Oilier costs lneiiJdrng 1M coat of nan.tn regu1110ry acllvllliH.
12. Re-ftllng of subdivision map 5233.00 2001!-ID'
wtthalerk
101'12106 100% Ord. #IOf$.018
13. Grading voucher $83.00 2008.Q7 10112106 100% Ord.tlll&o018
MASTER SCHEDULe OF FeES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECnON 2100-DlWet.OPMENT SERVICES
YEAR eFF&Cnv£ %OF
FeE OESCRJPnON FEe AMOUNT ADOPT SO DATE COST REF!R!NCE
(CONTINUED)
14. Gntdfng Plan • chackll10 fee
a.. 50 cubic ~rds or Ius No lee
b. 51 -100 cubic ~nts $352.00 2006-07 10112/0B 100\14 Ord. MJ6.018
c. 101-1,000cublc ~rds S418..CO 2008.()7 101"12106 100% Ord.II0~18
d. 1,001 • 10.0110 cubic yards $487.00 2008.()7 10112106 100% Ont 10&-018
e. 10,001 • 100,000 $487.00 for 1st1 0.000 CUbiC yards 20CJ8.07 10/12106 100% Ord. if0&.018
cublc~rds pll.lll118 .00 eadladdlllonal
10,000 cubic yards or fl'lldlon
lhereof
f. 100,001-200,000 $1,529.00 fer 1st 100,000 cubic 2006-07 10/12.106 101194 Ord.ii06-Q18
cublcyerda yam plus $58.00 each lidd111onal
10,000 Cl.lblc yarlfa or friction
thereof
It-200,001 cublc )llllda 52109.00 for 111 200,000 cl.illc 2lJ08.07 10112106 100% Ord. •lJ&.01a
yards plus $29.50 each addlllorwal
10.000 CIA!Ic l'lrdS or ftaelicn
!hereof
15. Grading permit fees
•• SO cWJe yerds or leu $352.00 200B-07 101'12106 100% Ord.IOB-018
b. 51 • 100 cUbic Yllrds $418.00 2lJ08.07 10112106 100% Ord.to~18
c. 101 - 1 ,000 cubic yards $416.00 1sc100 cubic yards 20116-07 10/12108 100% Orlf.IOS-018
plus $51UO each ecldlllonal
100 cubic Yllfds orfracliOn
lhereof
MASTER SCHEIJIJLE OF FEES, CHARGES. AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2.100-DEVI!LOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR IEIIFECT1VE %OF
FEE DESCRIPTION FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE COST Rl!l'J!R!NC!
(COtmNUED)
d. 1,001 -10,000 cubic yards $951.50.00 1at1 ,000 cubic yards 2008.07 10J121tl5 10094 Old. flaB.O'II
plus 1<18.50 eadl addlllonal
t ,000 cui* yards or Jrac!lon
!hereof
e. 1 M01-1 00.000 cubic )'llrdl 51.370.00 1st 10,000 cubic yards 20Qii..()7 101'12108 100% Ord.II0&-018
plus $11 8.00 each addllfonal
10,000 cubic YI!Jds or fraction
!hereof
f. 100,001 and mona cubic yards. 52,432.00 1st 100.000 cubic yards 20[)8.07 10/12106 100% Ord.l¥1J8.018
and up plus $58.00 each addlliOnat
10,000 cubic yards or frae11on !hereof
g. Special gn~dlno Pllnlil (~Inspection) $70.150 per hr (2 nr min.) 2006-07 10/1210!1 100% Ord. WOB.f)18
h. Anal 9(8dlng lnspecllon beyond $70.50 per hr t2 hr min.) 2006o07 10/121tl8 100% Ord. MIB-018
one lnSI)IIlC1Icn
16. Site Plan review: 201)!1.07 10112108 10094 Old. toe-018
•• Comrn~tclll, lndtUiionat $3,518.00 base
and non-!Bidenllal uaea. (lesalhen one atve)
mobile home park. and plus S1,75&.00 par acra over
fndualllll t acre, up 110 6 acres, maxtrnum
charge 512,308.00
b.. M!Atlpla dwellln~Jt:
1) Up 105 unit& $1.1142.00
2) 6110 10 until $3,0;1.00
3) 11 or mare units $3,921.00 IIIUS $31.50 par ~lt
c. Ra1r !l8td and excessl11e 5705.00 each
frvnt yard encmachmant
d. Signs $1,052.00 each
•• Slle Plan R8llllian
(Inducing mklar dl\llallon far
36% of appllr:allon tee 1994-IHI 100% Old. ft5.015
a..wl and gra....r operaliOn)
f. Slla Plan Review Vlo1811on 315% ot appllcaUati faa 198~5 100% Ont.ftH1S
g. Valin; Tanrauve Maps 2006.()7
(resldenllal only)
1Df1Mle 100% Ord. fi08.D18
1) Uplo51Dts $1,942.00
2) 6-10iotl SS,091.DD
3} 11 plus lots 13,921.00
lllus Sio.so Jlot
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FEES, CHARGES, ANO R!COVEREt> COSTS
SECTION 2600-D!VELOPMENT S!.ftVICES
Y2AR I!FFI!!CTIVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPTION FEEAMOLINT ALl OPTED DATE COST REFERENCE
(CONTINUED)
11. Change of CICQllllntY ct.ve/op-Same as 111te Plan review 2006.()7 10112/0111 100% Old.II08.018
menl c:lasslbtlon $3,516.00 ba&a
(Jus than o,. acre}
plus $1,75B.OD pet act& 0¥11'
1 acre, up to 6 acres, maximum
charge $12,308.00
1 a. SMARA and ~rmltlnsplllt1ion ()'118rly) 52,~1.00 per site 2001·08 01.104108 100% Ord.l¥07-ooJ
1 D. SMARA and Permit Rllnspecllon 2001-08 01.104108 100% Old. MTT..ooJ
e) Staff Af111t;st $116.50
b) Clerfcel $48.51)
20. L.l p81Cal¥8tilica1fort S49.50each 2006-01 10/12106 100% Otd.!WJ8.018
21. Bench malk boOk $11.50 w book
22. Sactlon c:omer $62.00 par book
23. Revlaw of grading end drainage $175.50 per plan
Pl1111 rlferred to !he County
by lncorpora.lld Clllft
24. Malnlaln a gqraphlcallrn:lu of Fee equal to reeo!dera fell! • 2008-0i 021171011 Ordto8.003 certlllc:ales r:J correGllan. lor lllng a map
25. Subdl\liaton Agreement Extension $512.00 20011-0'1 101121015 100% Old. f06.018
26. Relnsptcllon (Wolk Not Ready for
First Inspection) $256.00 2008..07 10112l06 100% Ord. #06..018
·~Feel'"·-• Tl'le current IIICiardara fee Ia SAM "'r lhe ~irs~ lhelt '"""' 's~IJI!I .,,. a""" addltbtal IIIH!,
MAST&R SCHEOULi OF FEI!S, CHARGES. AND RECOVERED COSTS
SECTION 2500-D~LOPMaiT SeRVICES
Y!AR l:l"RCTIVE %OF
FEE DESCRIPTION F!!l! AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE COST RI!F!RI!NCE
(CONllNUI!D)
Tt. &llnslan of Property Une $320.00 200fl.07 10112106 100% Ord. if08.018
~l{P.LA.)
28. Overtime (2hr. minimum) 1994-95 100% Orr:l. M-OtS .. Amlf)fll $53.00 20015-07 10112/08 100% Ofd. M-018
b. Planning & ,..P ehecklng $SS..50 2008-U7 1011?JOII 1009& Ore!. tll&018
c. Cllll'ical $32.50 2008..()7 1DI1:Ml6 100% Onl. 111JS.018
2580. Cow!ty Service Anar;
1. RtlmtnnemeniiD Fresno Ccwl1y D!llete 11!91-92 1(1~ Ord. tez.013
for formallOn costs of c.s.A.
No. 35 (rotld mllntenanee)
2. Fonna!lon or boundaryehenge Maps, boundary descriPIIon,
cotta of tonu of benllllt budget. and by4aws are 1o be prepared
inCSA35 by applicants englnear/&urveyor
a. ZOne of beneftl $4,311.00 2007-oa 12J04i07 100% Ord.f07..048
b. BaundaryChertge" $4,242.00 2007..()8 1~ Ord. t07.o48
10 zone of benlllfll (new
subdlvtslon)
c. Other !hen new subdMsions A retmbufsemant agreement 2011·12 OI!JOltl11 10~ Ord.t-11.007
(~ng Private md ...til be entered lmo rat actual
malntenanee zones of bond\} coats. A dapcall will be requited
beaed upon eiJIImaled cosL
d. Bound1ry Change• A 181mtlu1"181118nt egreemem 2011-12 08J09111 100911 Ord.l11..007
(olhllr thlltl naw aubdlvlafon) will be entered Jnlo for aetual
COS1s. A c1ep0Sitlttill be required
based upon Ill/milled coel
3. Farma&lon or BoundiiY Change• A reimbursement agreement 2011·12 08109111 100% Ord. 1¥11..007
of CSAs oltter hln CSA 35 Will ba entered Into fat actual
costa. A deposit will be required
basad upon estimated cost.
4.. Stala ~lng Faa Lllest schedUle of leu eatabllshed 2007..(J8 100% Ord.IJD.2..013
by !hi Stale of Calltorru
Boanj of EqUIIIzaiiOn In
GoiHtmment Code Section 54900
5. Request for UN oiiiUbllc financing of Dellle 1993-94 100% Ord.~1! prlvaJa rle¥afot:~menl prllfects
5. lmpro-nt Ol<lct Forma11on or A relmbur•mem IQretment 2011-12 OBIOFU11 100% Otd.#tt..(JD7 Bounclary Change" .WII be anl8red Into for ICIUII
casts. A dapcsit will be required
based upon ellinlnlclcost.
7. Communlly Faclllila Dl&1rict (Uetg.Roos) A ralmtluraement llgre8ment 2011-12 011109111 100% Ord. t11.Q07 Formdon or Boundtry Change wfl be entared lnlll for adUal
eos1s. A deposit v.ill be raQUlr1d
MASTI!R SCHEDULE OF PEI!S, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED COSTS
&eC'TION 2!00-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR S'F!.C11VE %OF
FEE DESCRIPOON FEE AMOUNT ADOPTED DATi COST REPERI!NC!
basad UPCJI'I es11maled cost.
"lncltllls annexations. dmchm!NII:I,
consollftltans .m dlssoluelons
MASTER SCHEDULE OF F&ES, CHARGES, AND RiCOWRED COSTS
SECTION 2!500 -DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YEAR EFFECTIVE %OF
Fl!l! OI!SCRIP110N Fe!: AMOUNT ADOP'reD DATI! COST REF&RENCE
2115. Health Department Lllnd Usa Ravl8W' 2008..()9 07101108 100% OJd,j Q8.008
1. Cond111onat Usa Permit $654.00 lad'!
2. Dlm:IOt RIIYII.w and Approvll 5432.00 each
3. Tent.tlve Tracts $1.092.00 each
.c. VarllilllCel $3115.00 each
5.. ZOning DlviSICn Amendment $383.00 each
8. Envlranmantal Anusmant S338.00each
1 Tel'llatlw Parcll Ma9 S305.00 each
8. TenlltUve Pm:elt.Aep Waiver S30S.OO each
11. Pre-Appllca110n for Cerlillcata of S305.00uch
Compliance
10.Site Pl.n ".W.W(Ban}
L Commarclat. lnslllullanal $518.00 each (base) plus $280/acre
and Non-Resldenllll eMil' 1 acre up to 8 acres
(IT1IIX. $1,816)
b. Multiple DweiUngs
1) Flat Rate $518.00 each
2007-QB 07101107 100% Ord.f.Q5.008
11. General Plan Amendment "'II.OOeach
12. LAFCO Application $178.(1() IIlilCh
2586. Department of A;flcl.lltul'l Lllrtd Uu Revi8W' 2012·13 01f10112 100% osu .. 1z.o16
1. Condlflonal uae Permit $!51.00 each
2. Initial S1udy $42.00aach
3. Dlret1cr Revtew and Approval $25.00each
4. TentaVve Traell S25.001!18ch
5. Vlll'llnces $34.00 l!l8ch
e. Envirllnmenlllt AtMew $25.00.-ch
1 Tanlatiwl Pan:e! Mllj) $34.00 each
8.. Tentatlw Parcel Ma!:t WaiYet $34.00 each
9. Pre-AppltcaUon for Cltl1ltlclle or S25.00ueh
Compliance
2S87. Coun&y Review of Olllar AtlllflCJ''II AppiiCIIHon 2007-08 0% Otd.M 07-!MB
Fee BhaH be paid by the City refentnglhe
appllcallon or the ~bnlldeveloper of the
projact.
MASTER SCHEDULE OF FHS. CHARGI!S, .AND ReCOVEReD COSTS
SECTION 2&00 -DEVE\.OPMENT SERVICES
YEAR !Ff'ICTlYI! %OF
FEE DESCRIPnQN FE!: AMOUNT ADOPTED DATE COST REPERI!NCE
1 . !nvimnmll'llal AsMasmenta Delete 0%
2. Draft EIR Delele 0%
3. Nollca of Preparation Delele 0%
4. Other (suppllmanlll EIRs. Dl!llele 0%
Addendums, etc.)
S. Rlghl-of-v Aoqulsllllon Del ale 0%
15. Tentllllve Tf8G\s Deltla 0%
7. LAFCO Ravlew Oelele tm
MAStER SCHEDULE OF PEES, CHARGES, AND RECOVERED C08T8
SECTION 2500-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
YUR !FF~CTJVI: .,..Of
FEE DESCRll"TION FE! AMOUNT ADOPTED !)All! COST REFERENCI!
25190. Groundw~.WTtal'llfar Parmltll and Procesalng 2005-<l8 08112105 100% urd. 110S.013
1. OroundwlltfTransfer Dlrec&or RavliW $1,9741.00 NCh
and Approval
2. PI'OCIISing Miscellaneous Oocumenls $181.00 each
3. Envlr01'1memal Review S 192.00 fJICI'I
4. CIQa 11 Envlro11R181U811 AsMuments
a. Groundwalar Tran.ter ORA SU95.00 eaeh
b. &nwonmtntal ... ct Report (EIR)
(SIIIf andlar ConiUitanl) Actual ~·t
5. Appeal of Olrectofs Dlldsfon S377.00 eacl'l
HIS. Publlcatlonl
1. Dwlllltlg Housa Guide $18.50 7005-(]6 08112105 100% Ord.lfl5.013
EXHIBIT E
BIDOINB DOCUMENTS
SEL.f..DEALING TRANSACTION DISCLOSURE (FINANCIAL)
Non-corporate bidders may disregard this section.
Bidders shall complete a SELF-DEALING TRANSACTION DISCLOSURE FORM, provided
herein, for each applicable corporate director of the bidding company. The signed form(s)
shall be submitted as a part of the company's proposal or quotation.
Complete the form and indicate ·NONE" under part 3 when your company is a corporation and
no directors are involved with a Self-Dealing Transaction. The form must be signed by an
individual authorized to legally bind the corporation when no directors have a Self-Dealing
Transaction.
DISCLOSURE OF SELF-DEALING TRANSACTIONS: The following provision will be
incorporated into ensuing agreements. It shall apply only when the CONTRACTOR is
operating as a corporation (a for-profit or non-profit corporation) or if during the term of the
agreement, CONTRACTOR changes its status to operate as a corporation.
Thi$ provision is only applicable if the CONTRACTOR is op&rating as a corporation (a for-profit
or non-profit corporation) or if during the term of this agreement, the CONTRACTOR changes
its status to operate as a corporation.
Members of the CONTRACTOR's Board of Directors shaH disclose any self-dealing
transactions that they are a party to while CONTRACTOR is providing goods or performing
services under this agreement. A self-dealing transaction shaH mean a transaction to which the
CONTRACTOR Is a party and In which one or more of its directors has a material financial
Interest. Members of the Board of Directors shaH disclose any self-dealing transactions that
they are a party to by completing and signing a Self-Dealing Transaction Disclosure Form
(Exhibit #} and submitting It to the COUNTY prior to commencing with the self-dealing
transaction or immediately thereafter.
Mln:h ID. 2DIS County of Fresno P~g~P-1
B1DDING DOCUMENTS
SELF-DEALING TRANSACTION DISCLOSURE FORM INSTRUCTIONS
In order to conduct business with the County of Fresno (hereinafter referred to as "County'"),
members of a contractor's board of directors (hereinafter referred to as "County Contractor"),
must disclose any self-dealing transactions that they are a party to while providing goods,
performing services, or both for the County. A self-dealing transaction is defined below:
"A seN-dealing transaction means a transaction to which the corporation is a party and which
one or more of its directors has a material financial interest"
The definition above will be utmzed for purposes of completing the disclosure form.
(1) Enter board member's name, job title (if applicable), and date this disclosure is being
made.
(2) Enter the board member's company/agency name and address.
(3) Describe in detail the nature of the self-dealing transaction that is being disclosed to
the County. At a minimum, include a description of the following:
a. The name of the agency/company with which the corporation has the transaction;
and
b. The nature of the material financial interest in the Corporation's transaction that the
board member has.
(4) Describe in detail why the self-dealing transaction is appropriate based on applicable
provisions of the Corporations Codes.
(5) Form must be signed by the board member that is involved in the self-dealing
transaction described in Sections (3) and (4).
Form provided on following page.
Mln:h 10. 2115 County of Fresno P~g~P-2
BtDOING DOCUMENTS
SELF-DEALING TRANSACTION DISCLOSURE FORM
(1) Company Board Member Information:
Name: Date:
Job Title:
(2) Company/Agency Name and Address:
(3) Disclosure (Please describe the nature of the self-dealing transaction you are a party to)
(4) Explain why this self-dealing transaction is consistent with the requjrements of Corporations
Code 5233 (a)
(5) Authorized Signature
Signature:
Mrii0.2DI5 County of Fresno
Date:
JIJge P-3