Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCMAQ Application - Palm Ave Sidewalks from Ashlan to Gettysburg.pdf 2025/2026 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Application COUNTY OF FRESNO co U� 56 PALM AVENUE SIDEWALKS 3of3 $135949621 1 $138013222 $4,827.45/Ib. Applicant Inf• • Implementing Agency: This agency must enter into a Master Agreement with Caltrans and will be financially and contractually responsible for the delivery of the project within all pertinent Federal funding requirements, including being responsible and accountable for the use and expenditure of program funds. This agency is responsible for the accuracy of the technical information provided in the application and is required to sign the application. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY'S NAME: COUNTY OF FRESNO IMPLEMENTING AGENCY'S ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIPCODE: 2220 TULARE STREET, 6T" FLOOR FRESNO I CA 93721 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY'S CONTACT PERSON: CONTACT PERSON'S TITLE: Mohammad Alimi Design Engineer CONTACT PERSON'S PHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (559)600-4505 malimi@fresnocountyca.gov ProjectGeneral • • PROJECT NAME: To be used in all program referenced project lists Palm Avenue Sidewalks—Ashlan to Gettysburg Project/Application Number: (Priority# - Max 10 per Agency) 13of3 FTIP Proposed Project Title: (Maximum 34 characters) Palm Avenue Sidewalks—Ashlan to Gettysburg Project is being submitted in the following category: ❑ Transit ❑ Cleaner Fuel Technology ❑ Traffic Flow Improvements ® Bicycle/Pedestrian ❑ PM-2.5/10 Reduction ❑ Miscellaneous Is the-project Cost-Effective? ($88111b. or less) YES❑ NO® Does the project deliver PM2.5 emission reductions? YES® NOD 2 SUMMARY OF PROJECT SCOPE: Summary of the Existing Condition, Project Scope, and the Expected Benefits: Existing Condition: The project includes sidewalk improvements with an emphasis on ADA compliance. The project would provide basic amenities such as pedestrian facilities that are ADA compliant to improve transportation in the area. Key destinations in the area include places of worship, local businesses, Wawona Middle School and Powers-Ginsburg Elementary School. Currently, the majority of the proposed project area lacks sidewalks. Pedestrians are forced to either walk on a dirt path or in the street alongside motorized vehicles on a high-traffic roadway. People who are wheelchair-bound are forced to travel in the street alongside traffic instead of having adequate sidewalk and ADA curb ramp facilities. Project Scope: Construct sidewalks with curb and gutter on the west side of Palm Avenue between Gettysburg Avenue and Ashlan Avenue including ADA curb ramps, and also on Holland Avenue and Swift Avenue west of Palm Avenue to close sidewalk gaps. Expected Benefits: Because this is a residential area with an elementary and middle school, parents and students will enjoy improved access and safety. The proposed project will fill in the gaps and repair the poor sidewalk conditions which cause daily issues for students. The project improvements will help protect children from physical injuries and vehicle hazards and give them a safer path to school and other destinations. Existing curb & gutter will be replaced with the sidewalk installation where needed to improve drainage. Currently, there are sections with no sidewalk and settled, cracked or lifted existing curb & gutter. Walking to school during bad weather is particularly hazardous. During wet weather, the dirt where sidewalks are muddy and slippery. Since students will no longer be forced to walk on the street meant for vehicle use, the proposed project helps protect children from traffic accidents. By addressing the issues of puddling during rainy weather, the project combats poor air quality in dry, windy weather. PROJECT PURPOSE: Describe the main purpose of the project: The purpose of the project is to improve air quality and reduce emissions by closing gaps in pedestrian infrastructure that will encourage increased walking and less driving by providing safe pedestrian infrastructure. FTIP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (Max 156 characters) [(Location :) + (Limits) + (;) + (Improvement)] Palm Ave Sidewalk Improvements — Gettysburg Ave to Ashlan Ave, and on Holland Ave & Swift Ave 3 PROJECT LOCATION: (Include Route# or Name, Post Mile Limits/Length of Project and Project Limits) Palm Ave from Gettysburg Ave to Ashlan Ave, and on Holland Ave & Swift Ave west of Palm Ave In addition to the Location Description provided, please attach a location map to the application as specified in "Attachment G" below. The location map needs to show the project boundaries in relation to the Implementing Agency's boundaries. Functional Classification: Examples of local function include arterial, expressway, major collectors, etc., as designated within local circulation plan. Provide both local classification and federal classification if different. The federal classification takes precedence. CMAQ funds may be used on local roadways. Palm Ave: Major Collector, Holland Ave: Local Road, Swift Ave: Local Road 4 ProjectDetails Air Pollution Reduction in kg/day: (submit calculations as attachment) 0.03 k /da Cost-Effectiveness in dollars/pound: (refer to guidelines for methodology, submit calculations as attachment) $4,827.45/lb. Average Daily Traffic Volume (ADT): (also, please provide source of ADT data) 11,300 (Source of ADT data: Fresno County Public Works Traffic Census, 2019 Annual Auto Trips Reduced in trips/year: (if greater than zero, calculations should be included in emissions reduction sheet attachment) 14,768 Annual Auto Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Reduced in miles/year: (if greater than zero, calculations should be included in emissions reduction sheet attachment) 14,768 Air Quality Screening Criteria Code(s): (refer to Appendix A for list of codes, list all applicable) [-3-02 Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Length/Width (in miles/feet) of Any New Active Transportation Facility (Class I / II / III / IV): nl/n Length/Width (in miles/feet) of New Sidewalk: Number/Type of New Crosswalks: N/A 2 Number of New ADA Ramps: Number/Type of New Pedestrian Signals: 12 N/A If ITS Project, Number of Signals Connected: Length of Connected Signals: N/A I N/A Does this project have a warrant study? (submit calculations as attachment) YES, See attachment ❑ NON Right of Way (ROW) Impacts: (Check all that apply) 5 ❑ Agency has site control. Project is 100% within the Implementing Agency's ROW and/or is within their control at the time of this application submittal. (This includes temporary construction easements) M Private ROW and/or utility relocations required. Project will likely require ROW in fee ownership, permanent easements, and/or temporary construction easements from private owners and/or will require utility relocations from utility companies outside that implementing agency's governmental control. The federal ROWprocess involving private property acquisitions and/or private utility relocations can often take 18 to 24 months after environmental document approval. The project schedule in the application for ROW needs to reflect the necessary time to complete the federal ROW process. ❑ Public ROW required. Project will likely require ROW, Easements, encroachment, and/or approval involving Governmental, Environmental, or Railroad owner's property. What is the total number of months included in the project schedule to account for all ROW and/or utility impacts selected above? 124 months Anticipated ROW Certification Date. Expected date project will receive ROW certification or RFA for certification will be submitted. 2030 Is this project listed on the Financial Constrained List of the 2022 RTP? IN Project is on the constrained project list in the 2022 RTP. RTP Project ID: Listed in the 2026 RTP: FRE504662; FRE504669; FRE504668; FRE504666 ❑ Project is NOT on the constrained project list in the 2022 RTP. If not, does the project meet the goal and objectives of the RTP policies? YES ❑ NO ❑ Optional: Please explain why the project is not on the RTP. The CMAQ Scoring Committee may take extenuating circumstances into consideration. Project would still be reduced by 5 points at minimum. N/A Please provide any other pertinent subjective information that you would like evaluators to consider when scoring your project: N/A 6 Project • Fund Work Phase 2026127 2027128 2028129 2029130 Total CMAQ Regional Bid Funds 88.53% 1 Percent share of costs—maximum 88.53% PE 247,031 247,031 ROW 112,433 112,433 Construction 1,235,157 1,235,157 Sub-total 247,031 112,433 1,235,157 1,594,621 Local Matching Funds 11.47% Matching fund rate—minimum 11.47% PE 32,006 32,006 ROW 14,567 14,567 Construction 160,028 160,028 Sub-total 32,006 14,567 160,028 206,601 Project Total PE 279,037 279,037 ROW 127,000 127,000 Construction 1,395,185 1,395,185 Grand Total 279,037 127,000 1,395,185 1,801,222 ■ Please fill out the project delivery schedule according to the planned years of implementation for your project. ■ Note that actual programming will depend on financial capacity. ■ Please note that the cost-effectiveness calculation is based on the amount of total CMAQ funding, including any local match. ■ Any non-participating costs (non-CMAQ eligible costs) of your project need to be clearly listed in the engineers estimate, on this project delivery schedule, and on the financial plan. Is the project applying as a "construction-ready project"? Points will be awarded to projects requesting construction funding only and within the first two years of the FTIP. Please attach all available environmental and ROW certifications or documentation. Projects requesting points in this category will go through a Caltrans screening process. 7 ❑ Project is requesting funds for construction only in the first year (2026/27) of the FTIP and PE/ROW documentation is attached. ❑ Project is requesting funds for construction only in the second year (2027/28) of the FTIP and PE/ROW documentation is attached. ® Project does not qualify /applicant is opting out Is the project going to follow an expedited delivery schedule? YES❑ NO® Please check "yes" if your project qualifies for the construction ready and/or expedited project delivery scoring criteria and you agree to the proiect delivery guidelines. Is the project leveraging additional local funds? Points will be awarded to projects that leverage additional local funds (Measure C, TDA) in addition to the required local match. ❑ Project includes a 20% local match ❑ Project includes a 30% local match ® Project is not leveraging additional local funds 8 Project / • and Scalability Proposed Source of Local Match Funding: Place a checkmark in the box signifying where local matching funds for this project will be coming from and specify dollar amount. Sales Tax ❑City ❑ County ❑ Other (Transportation Development Act) Sales Tax sub-total: Gas Tax ❑ Gas Tax (Subventions to Cities) ❑ Gas Tax(Subventions to Counties) Gas Tax sub-total: Other Local Funds a o ❑ City General Funds —� ❑ Street Taxes and Developer Fees M Local Transportation Funds ❑ Other Other Local Funds sub-total: 208,421 Transit ❑ Transit Fares ❑ Other Transit(parcel/property taxes, parking revenue, etc.) ❑ Tolls (e.g., non-state-owned bridges) ❑Other(e.g., RTEP) Transit sub-total: ❑ Tolls ❑ Bridge ❑ Corridor _J ❑ Regional Transit Fares/Measures a Z ❑ Regional Sales Tax "Measure C" Local Pass Through O w ❑ Regional Bond Revenue ❑ Regional Gas Tax ❑ Vehicle Registration Fees (CARB Fees, SAFE) ❑ Other Regional sub-total: 208,421 Grand Total: 208,421 9 Is this project scalable? YES❑ NO® If yes, specify the minimum funds required: $ Please provide an explanation of scalability with specific reference to budget line items on the Financial Plan (Attachment B). N/A Would your agency accept partial funding for this project? YES® NOD If yes, please explain your contingency plan to fully fund and implement the project. The County will accept partial funding for this project and make up the difference with S61 and Measure C funds. 10 Application Application Checklist and Signature Page (Required for all applications) Attachment A Financial Plan (Required for all applications) Attachment B AB 1012 Resolution (Required for all applications) Attachment C Project Estimate (Required for all applications) Attachment D Cost-Effectiveness and Emissions Reductions Calculations (Required for all applications) Attachment E RTP Documentation (Required for all applications) Attachment F Project Location Map (Required for all applications) Attachment G Preliminary Engineering and Design, Environmental, and Right_of_Way l eGumentation or r e rti f i v^at+o��needed)c rr Attachment H Warrant Stu-d needed AttaGhmern+ 1 Photos of Existing Conditions (Strongly recommended for all applications) Attachment I Additional Attachments Additional attachments may be included. They should be organized in a way that allows application reviews easy identification and review of the information. All additional attachments must be scanned into one document. Please list the additional attachments: Attachment J — CalEnviroScreen 11 Attachment A: / • and Signature P. • Name of Project: Palm Avenue Sidewalks—Ashlan to Gettysburg Submitted by: Mohammad Alimi, Design Engineer Agency/Organization: Fc—ounty of Fresno, Department of Public Works and Planning Check All That Apply: ® Project meets CMAQ eligibility under federal guidelines. ® Sponsor will comply with California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, AB1012 (Timely Use of Funds), Buy America, and/or any other applicable regulations. ® Project can be obligated within the identified timelines. ® Project scope will remain the same as detailed in application. ® Emissions calculations are attached and show positive reduction in air pollution. ❑ If needed, a warrant study is attached. ❑ If needed, PE&D, Environmental, and ROW documentation are attached. M AB 1012 Resolution is attached. M 10 hard copies of application for regional bid are attached, and an electronic copy has been provided via email or USB flash drive. M An engineer's estimate/quote of probable costs for project is attached. M All required attachments are included. © I understand that incomplete or late submittals will be considered for scoring at the committee's discretion, as time allows, after scoring other projects. I certify that the information contained in the application packet is accurate to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to submit the following project proposal for scoring and possible programming. The agency will provide the required non-federal matching funds, and deliver the project as proposed within the scope and schedule specified in the application should the project be awarded funding. Signature of full-time agency staff authorized to enter into a contract for federal funding if selected. Signed: Printed Name: Mohammad Alimi, Design Engineer Date: 03/21/2025 12 Attachment B: Financial Plan Below, please discuss the project funding strategy, clearly indicating total cost, authorization amounts and dates for all funding sources committed or anticipated to fully fund the project and any contingency plan if anticipated funding does not materialize. Any contingency plan to provide a reduced scope, should partial funding be available, would need to take into consideration air quality benefits and demonstrate it is feasible to perform the project in deliverable segments, or with reduced scope. The total project cost is estimated to be$1,801,222, with a CMAQ Request of$1,594,621.This is equivalent to 88.53%of the total cost.The local match amount of$206,601 would be paid for out of the County's Measure C or S131 funds. If full funding is not available,the County will accept partial funding for the Preliminary Engineering and Right of Way phases and apply for Construction funding in future grants cycles. I certify that the information contained in the financial plan is accurate to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to submit the following project proposal for scoring and possible programming. The agency will provide the required non-federal matching funds, and deliver the project as proposed within the scope and schedule specified in the application should the project be awarded funding. Signed: Printed Name: Mohammad Alimi, Design Engineer Date: 03/21/2025 13 23-1184 ATTACHMENT C Resolution No.23-370 PLACEHOLDER RESOLUTION 1 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF FRESNO 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ) OF FRESNO COUNTY REGARDING PROJECT ) 6 DELIVERY SCHEDULES FOR FEDERAL ) RESOLUTION TRANSPORTATION PROJECT SELECTION UNDER ) 7 ASSEMBLY BILL 1012 ) 8 g WHEREAS, AB 1012 was enacted into State law, in part to provide for the "timely use" of State 10 and Federal funding; and 11 WHEREAS, the County of Fresno (County) is able to apply for and receive Federal and State 12 funding under the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program, the Carbon Reduction 13 Program (CRP), and the Surface Transportation Block Grant(STBG) Program; and 14 WHEREAS, the County desires to ensure that its projects are delivered in a timely manner to 15 preclude the Fresno Region from losing those funds for non-delivery; and 16 WHEREAS, it is understood by the County that failure for not meeting project delivery dates for 17 any phase of a project may jeopardize Federal or State funding to the Region; and 18 WHEREAS, the County must demonstrate dedicated and available matching funds. 19 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Fresno County Board of Supervisors (Board) 20 hereby agrees to ensure that all project delivery deadlines for all project phases will be met or exceeded. 21 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that failure to meet project delivery deadlines may be deemed as 22 sufficient cause for the Fresno Council of Governments Policy Board to terminate an agency's project 23 and reprogram Federal/State funds as deemed necessary. 24 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board hereby directs its management and engineering 25 staffs to ensure all projects are carried out in a timely manner as per the requirements of AB 1012 in 26 accordance herewith. 27 28 /// ATTACHMENT C PLACEHOLDER RESOLUTION 1 THE FOREGOING, was passed and adopted by the following vote of the Board of Supervisors of 2 the County of Fresno this 28t' day of November , 2023,to wit 3 4 AYES: Supervisors Brandau, Magsig, Mendes, Pacheco, Quintero 5 NOES: None 6 ABSENT: None 7 ABSTAINED: None 8 9 S Q�irvisors ro, hairman of the Board 10 of of the County of Fresno 11 ATTEST: 12 Bemice E. Seidel Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 13 County of Fresno, State of California 14 15 By ` Deputy 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTACHMENT D COUNTY OF FRESNO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PALM AVE FROM ASHLAN TO HOLLAND AVENUE March 17,2025 PROJECT: PALM AVENUE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION: PALM FROM ASHLAN AVE TO GETTYSBURG AVE,INCLUDES SWIFT AND HOLLAND ITEM ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT OF UNIT PRICE AMOUNT NO. QUANTITY MEASURE 1 SUPPLEMENTAL WORK(PRICE INDEX FLUCTUATION) 50000 $ $1.00 $50,000.00 2 LEAD COMPLIANCE PLAN 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00 3 lCONSTRUCTION PROJECT FUNDING SIGN 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500.00 4 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE SIGN 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00 6 JOB SITE MANAGEMENT 1 LS $400000 $4.000.00 7 PREPARE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN 1 LS $2,500.00 $2.500.00 8 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000.00 IMPLEMENTATION 9 STORM WATER ANNUAL REPORT 1 EA $1,000.00 $1.000.00 10 ITREE REMOVAL 10 EA $1,000.00 $10,000.00 11 CLEARING AND GRUBBING 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000.00 12 MOBILIZATION 1 LS $130,000.00 $130,000.00 13 PREFABRICATED STEEL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 1 LS $75.500.00 $75.500.00 14 SHEET PILE COFFERDAM 1 LS $46.000.00 $46.000.00 15 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION(BRIDGE) 31 CY $345.00 $10,695.00 16 STRUCTURE BACKFILL(BRIDGE) 18 CY $700.00 $12,600.00 17 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE,BRIDGE FOOTING 6 CY $1,500.00 $9,000.00 18 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE,BRIDGE 11 CY $3,600.00 $39,600.00 19 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE,BRIDGE(POLYMER FIBER) 5 CY $2,000.00 $10,000.00 20 BAR REINFORCEMENT STEEL 1224 LB $3.00 $3,672.00 21 BAR REINFORCEMENT STEEL(BRIDGE) 1603 LB $4.50 $7,213.50 22 INSTALL PREFABRICATED STEEL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 1 LS $18,000.00 $18,000.00 23 ROADWAY EXCAVATION 120 CY $65.00 $7,800.00 24 MINOR CONCRETE(DRIVEWAY APPROACH) 207 SY $120.00 $24,840.00 25 IMINOR CONCRETE(CURB&GUTTER) 1554 LF $40.00 $62,160.00 26 MINOR CONCRETE(CURB RAMP) 12 EA $10.000.00 $120,000.00 27 MINOR CONCRETE(SIDEWALK) 12990 SF $12.00 $155.880.00 28 MINOR CONCRETE(RETAINING FOOTING) 200 LF $50.00 $10,000.00 29 HMA 3/4"AT MISCELLANEOUS LOCATIONS 200 TON $125.00 $25.000.00 30 ADJUST WATER VALVE BOXES TO FINISHED GRADE 10 EA $5,000.00 $50,000.00 31 SIGNAGE,STRIPING,PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 31 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $ 60,000.00 $ 50,000.00 SUBTOTAL $1,054,961 CONTINGENCIES(15%) $158,244 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING(15%) $181,981 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $1,395,185 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING(20%) $279,037 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION $127,000 TOTAL $1,801,222 ATTACHMENT E RIDESHARING AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES County: Fresno Federal Number: Approval Date: Caltrans DIST-EA: 06 Short Description: Palm Avenue Sidewalks Project Scope: Palm Ave Sidewalk Improvements—Gettysburg Ave to Ashlan Ave,and on Holland Ave& Swift Ave Project Sponsor: Private Agency: No CMAQ Funding: $1,801,222 _ Local Match: $1,594,621 Capital Recovery Factor: 0.07 Project Analysis Period: 20 years Auto Trips Eliminated (T): 284 trips(one-way)per week Length of auto trips eliminated (L): 1.00 miles in one direction of trip Weeks of operation per year(W): 52 weeks Adjustment(A) for auto access trips to transit,vanpools and carpools: 1.00 adjustment factor Annual Auto Trips Reduced: 14,768 annual trips Annual Auto VMT Reduced: 14,768 annual miles EMISSION Auto Trip End Factors Auto VMT Factors FACTORS: ROG : 0.398 grams per trip 0.046 grants per mile NOx : 0.246 0.045 PM2.5 : 0.002 0.034 EMISSION Pounds per Year Kilograms per Day REDUCTIONS: ROG: 14 0 NOx: 9 0 PM2.5: 1 0 Total: 25 0 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF: CMAQ Funds: W,827.45 per pound ,654,901 per ton All Funding Sources: 0,101.19 per pound ,202,380 per ton 1 ATTACHMENT F MAIN MENU LOGOUT FCOG Fresno conna of Goverawnu - VIEW PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF THIS PROJECT UPLOAD PROJECT DOCUMENTS PROJECT ID: FRE504668 VERSION: I EST TOTAL COST: $22,400.00 STATUS: In Progress-Programmed RANK SCORE: LAST MODIFIED BY: Estefany Vfllafan(111 612 0 2 5) APPROVED BY: N/A HISTORY j±)_ EDIT OBLIGATION ADMINISTRATIVE EDIT - READ-ONLY CALL FOR PROJECTS FRESNO MODELING# 26-00-RTP v INTERNAL NOTES ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES AMENDMENTNOTES L PROJECT INFORMATION MPLEMENT AGENCY MODE-GUIDELINES [EDIT SCORE[ Fresno Coun %-I Bike&Ped CAPACITY INC BIKE PED Nv Yv PROJECT TITLE Fig Garden ATP Sidewalks PROJECT DESCRIPTION-GUIDELINES Sidewalks; North side of Holland Ave from Palm Ave to 325 ft west of Palm Ave SYSTEM ROUTE SUFFIX INTERSECTION LOCAL STREET NAME FROM TO DISTANCE(M, Local v N v Holland Ave Palm Ave 325ft W of Palm Ave 0.06 PROGRAMMING INFORMATION($0) PDF DRILLDOWN REPORT [HISTORICAL REVENUES1 rGRAPH REVENUESI EST TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATED OPEN TO TRAFFIC DATE $22,400.00 2040 v HISTORICAL COMMENTS O COMPLETE PROJECT OO NEW PROJECT JUSTIFICATION-LAST UPDATED:12/12/2024- New project; safety �N ��1 ATTACHMENT F MAIN MENU LOGOUT FCOG - /�� Fresno Caancil of Governmemb ~ VIEW PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF THIS PROJECT UPLOAD PROJECT DOCUMENTS PROJECT ID: FRE504662 VERSION: 1 EST TOTAL COST: $42,000.00 STATUS: In Progress-Programmed RANK SCORE: LAST MODIFIED BY: Felix Goldwasser(111712025) APPROVED BY: NIA HISTORYI±)_ EDIT OBLIGATION ADMINISTRATIVE EDIT - READ-ONLY CALL FOR PROJECTS FRESNO MODELING# 26-00-RTP v INTERNAL NOTES ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES AMENDMENT NOTES PROJECT INFORMATION MP M EN MODE-GUIDELINES [EDIT SCOREI Fresno Count v Bike&Ped P INC BIKE PED Nv Yv PROJECT TITLE Fig Garden ATP Sidewalks PROJECT DESCRIPTION-GUIDELINES Sidewalks; West side of Palm Ave from Holland Ave to 600 feet north of Holland Ave SYSTEM ROUTE SUFFIX INTERSECTION LOCAL STREET NAME FROM TO DISTANCE BM Local v V N v Palm Ave Holland Ave Indianapolis Ave 0.11 PROGRAMMING INFORMATION($0) PDF DRILLDOWN REPORT [HISTORICAL REVENUESI IGRAPH REVENUESI EST TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATED OPEN TO TRAFFIC DATE $42,000.00 2040 HISTORICAL COMMENTS O COMPLETE PROJECT OO NEW PROJECT JUSTIFICATION-LAST UPDATED:1 211 212024- New project; safety ATTACHMENT F MAIN MENU LOGOUT FCOgot �� � ' r 11 i , ► it � � IJ1 �,�.� I i Fresno Connell - >* ofGovecainantt" , VIEW PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF THIS PROJECT UPLOAD PROJECT DOCUMENTS PROJECT ID: FRE504669 VERSION: 1 EST TOTAL COST: $7,000.00 STATUS: In Progress-Programmed RANK SCORE: LAST MODIFIED BY: Estefany Vlllafan(111 612 0 2 5) APPROVED BY: N/A HISTORY j,_ EDIT OBLIGATION ADMINISTRATIVE EDIT- READ-ONLY _CALL FOR PROJECTS FRESNO MODELING# 26-00-RTP v INTERNAL NOTES ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES AMENDMENT NOTES PROJECT INFORMATION IMPLEMENT NG AGENC MODE-GUIDELINES (EDIT SCORE] Fresno Coun v Bike&Ped CAPACITY INC BIKE PED Nv Yv PROJECT TITLE Fig Garden ATP Sidewalks PROJECT DESCRIPTION-GUIDELINES Sidewalks; North side of Ashlan Ave from Palm Ave to 100 feet west of Palm Ave SYSTEM ROUTE SUFFIX INTERSECTION LOCAL STREET NAME FROM TO DISTANCE(MD, Local N v Ashlan Ave Palm Ave 100ft W of Palm Ave 0.02 PROGRAMMING INFORMATION($0) PDF DRILLDOWN REPORT (HISTORICAL REVENUES I (GRAPH REVENUESI EST TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATED OPEN TO TRAFFIC DATE $7,000.00 2040 HISTORICAL COMMENTS O COMPLETE PROJECT OO NEW PROJECT JUSTIFICATION-LAST UPDATED:12/12/2024- New project; safety J� ATTACHMENT F MAIN MENU LOGOUT FCOG J y Fresno Council - I aGovernmenft VIEW PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF THIS PROJECT UPLOAD PROJECT DOCUMENTS PROJECT ID: FRE504666 VERSION: 'I EST TOTAL COST: $45,500.00 STATUS: In Progress-Programmed RANK SCORE: LAST MODIFIED BY: Felix Goldwasser(1/16/2025) APPROVED BY: N/A HISTORY j±)_ EDIT OBLIGATION ADMINISTRATIVE EDIT- READ-ONLY CALL FOR PROJECTS FRESNO MODELING# 26-00-RTP v INTERNAL NOTES ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES AMENDMENTNOTES PROJECT INFORMATION IMP A NCY MODE-GUIDELINES [EDIT SCOREI Fresno Coun v Bike&Ped CAPACITY INC K ED IN-1Yv PROJECT TITLE Fig Garden ATP Sidewalks PROJECT DESCRIPTION-GUIDELINES Sidewalks; South side of Ashlan Ave from Harrison Ave to Palm Ave SYSTEM ROUTE SUFFIX INTERSECTION LOCAL STREET NAME FROM TO DISTANCE(Mj) Local v N Ashlan Ave Harrison Ave Palm Ave 0.12 PROGRAMMING INFORMATION($0) PDF DRILLDOWN REPORT (HISTORICAL REVENUESI rGRAPH REVENUESI EST TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATED OPEN TO TRAFFIC DATE $45,500.00 2040 HISTORICAL COMMENTS O COMPLETE PROJECT O NEW PROJECT JUSTIFICATION-LAST UPDATED:12/12/2024- New project; safety ATl'ACHMENT G r Tudodt oG7 Clovis 7 / oMerced N \\ El2 �---Supervisor Districts 1 L IUngs CanYa, National Park r- • 0 4 � 3 Id Diablo Na WPar Y� 1 `Fresno Hanford o Visalia --- ..m etRange � ---- 10ngCity TYlar! A1U� c m� t ParteMlk venal 0 dETYSBURG The Well Community Church Wawona 1NDIANAPDLIS Middle INDIANAPOL'IS! School a z o 4" HOLLAND I nrn 0 _ m �a WT - �o ILL •SWIFT: . Powers-Ginsburg Elementary School Proposed Pedesdan Bridge Proposed Curb Ramps ; "f I 11�e Proposed A HLAN Proposed(min.recommended) - Z Existing Sidewalks — —71 1Miles Points of Interest MaintainedCountv 2. co DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING DATE: 3/18/25 t DESIGNED: FG O 1 56 Q PALM/ASHLAN SIDEWALK FREc,� IMPROVEMENTS DRAWN: FG ATTACHMENT G —r- Add curb ramps and Z o sidewalks 0 0 LL �l GETTYSBURG Existing church }' sidewalk _^. t7J i.- .... The Well Community Add curb ramps and Church sidewalks " Wawona INDIANAP.OLIS Middle = School "— Existing school + .+ sidewalk -- s. "HOLLAND � � r'-- w 0 p O x to F it a Proposed pedestrian bridge x 0 x 0 w Change modified one-way curb ramps a to traditional curb ramp and add new n SWIF.T N traditional curb ramps Powers Ginsburg rR�Oliine approx.8'behindg curb and gutter Elementary School ASHLAN Add curb ramp z BUCKINGHAM Proposed Pedesdan Bridge M PTO N 0 Proposed Curb Ramps x ow HAMPT.ON Proposed a Proposed(min.recommended) N BELLAIRE 0 0.05 0.1 Existing Sidewalks Source:Esn'Maxamijamilmilm Co ry Points of Inmest MaintainedCountv co e DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING DATE: 3118/25 r) DESIGNED: FIG p 156 p PALM/ASHLAN SIDEWALK FREE IMPROVEMENTS DRAWN: FIG .,'. '•. 00 AS Ir , R � ••••� �� m — �r lb ��• �� r� �� �.� Ir lv' any_PUCIIOH 3 _ AtV 40 mill ^.•� .•era .1' ij�'h�" r kAo • O i-I i I � • ��. ,� III 04 Yor ri*�1t t• r.. log I i 41 GOP it - �i r 4 �I ► �' loll dp— .r �• } OA fir'!� •. ��► i lip 1 may ' ��♦�� �•�� Y. •till � ,�.•� + . A .' i � �� �ice• '�' �(��� +-'1 L". _ I r r •� E l� .l+ • r _ OAY Ulw•S 3 ♦+ fit +� •: Vr� .� �►� r,• -s � •I.�� ,,,}mot. �j1Y Ikk -08 is 41 N w. ev it• �r = �-� - �., �. _ al.. r • •♦may 10 i - : IL ram r • �• , ti` w op ro :s• Y. , ' 4OL M vr vp 40 ol • f I •'• �' ' ' 't'• ( - • -- 1•� aAV PUE110H'3 rr • • 1 a. .. s •1 ,•' , .� 10. 1n '• �• �' 10 1,• !• ac .�-14 '•ter:.... 136 .. ; i. Flu.- ..,♦ .mot. 10 ��e'j ,1 ♦ ? ` , . , P1. 44 • . � loll c 1� •-• - Q; •1• .hr.. n 0 's l` o ,~� �� J�' � ':_ Tom=' l, ��• 1 -j.;Wt . 16 46 Ar 11 or , . � �.• - "�i� 1. '. �--.►Y-- .}e;•� ATTACHMENT I Photos of Existing Conditions Palm Avenue and Ashlan Avenue Pedestrian Improvements j ['1 �f�k7C)Hia�(m Figure 1:N Palm Avenue looking north,between Ashlan Avenue and Swift Avenue SCHOOL _ .. Figure 2: Holland Avenue west of Palm Avenue intersection looking west ATTACHMENT Photos ofExisting Conditions Palm Avenue • Ashlan Avenue Pedestrian • • �: a �i• ,J r � ,^,: ► •ter .. �- Figure 3:Palm Avenue facing east between Swift Avenue and Ashlan Avenue - _ �' r ry RJ iSS+'irk�-„'fti ',-+.• y't4t r z M1 .-� Figure Palm Avenue facing south toward Holland Avenue intersection ATTACHMENT I Photos of Existing Conditions Palm Avenue and Ashlan Avenue Pedestrian Improvements �1 r - - -- 1 ■ .__'z—..._�__-.�.._-_- -'-----t'----,.• sue^ ._-. —_... -- ---.-.e._.__._� .._.__..�__.`�..,�cS_'��,.1._._:^�i,.�si� Figure 5:NW Corner of Palm Avenue and Gettysburg Avenue Intersection •♦ 1 ". A .. R r 3 `� ��J�"o-y�rr.s._ ✓, e x i .L "'" _ ;' ,c�...'_ °4N Zy`r-'h i��k.` -':i►��'�.�.— — M �..t��"'�r �� „a � ••V,,,�.i�- - �•`�,.��5 `r. _ Figu re 6: SW Corner of Palm Avenue and Holland Avenue Intersection O R •9 81 �. !l1999 N f T�• i z U Q H H Q s a s s �.. ' � ir r g s 3[ 9 A.43 Dull I ,MEN�