HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgreement A-23-654 Amendment I to Agreement with CSU Fresno Foundation.pdf Agreement No. 23-654
1 AMENDMENT I TO AGREEMENT
2 THIS AMENDMENT, hereinafter referred to as Amendment I, is made and entered into
3 this 12th day of December , 2023 by and between the COUNTY OF FRESNO, a Political
4 Subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY", and CALIFORNIA STATE
5 UNIVERSITY, FRESNO FOUNDATION, a California non-profit, 501 (c) (3), Corporation, whose
6 address is 4910 N. Chestnut Ave., Fresno, CA 93726, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR"
7 (collectively the "parties").
8 WHEREAS, COUNTY, through its Department of Behavioral Health (DBH), recognizes the need
9 for a qualified agency to provide evaluation services on short-term lodging driven by peer support
10 services to individuals who have a severe mental illness (SMI), are currently homeless, or at-risk of
11 homelessness, are eligible for DBH services, and have not previously engaged in ongoing outpatient
12 behavioral health services; and
13 WHEREAS, the parties entered into that certain Agreement, identified as COUNTY Agreement
14 No. 21-066, effective March 9, 2021, hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement;" and
15 WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the Agreement for an additional eighteen (18) months
16 so that CONTRACTOR can continue providing these services; and
17 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement regarding changes as stated below and
18 restate the Agreement in its entirety.
19 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is
20 hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
21 1. All references in the Agreement to "Exhibit A" shall be deemed references to "Revised
22 Exhibit A", which is attached and incorporated by this reference.
23 2. All references in the Agreement to "Exhibit C" shall be deemed references to "Revised
24 Exhibit C", which is attached and incorporated by this reference.
25 3. This Agreement shall be extended for an additional Eighteen (18) month period
26 beginning January 1, 2024, through and including June 30, 2025.
27 4. That Section Four (4) of the Agreement titled "Compensation", Page Three (3), Line
28 Twenty (20) beginning with the word "For" and ending on Page Three (3), Line Twenty-Four (24) with
-1 - COUNTY OF FRESNO
Fresno,CA
1 "CONTRACTOR.", be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
2 "For the period July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024, in no event shall actual services
3 performed be in excess of Fifty Thousand and No/100 Dollars. ($50,000).
4 For the period July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025, in no event shall actual services
5 performed be in excess of Fifty Thousand and No/100 Dollars. ($50,000).
6 In no event shall services performed under this Agreement be in excess of Two Hundred
7 Eighteen Thousand, Five Hundred twenty and No/100 Dollars ($218,520). It is understood that all
8 expenses incidental to CONTRACTOR's performance of services under this Agreement shall be borne
9 by CONTRACTOR."
10 5. When both parties have signed this Amendment I, the Agreement, and this Amendment I
11 together constitute the Agreement.
12 6. The CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to the COUNTY that:
13 a. The CONTRACTOR is duly authorized and empowered to sign and perform its
14 obligations under this Amendment.
15 b. The individual signing this Amendment on behalf of the CONTRACTOR is duly
16 authorized to do so and his or her signature on this Amendment legally binds the
17 CONTRACTOR to the terms of this Amendment.
18 7. The parties agree that this Amendment may be executed by electronic signature as
19 provided in this section.
20 a. An "electronic signature" means any symbol or process intended by an individual signing
21 this Amendment to represent their signature, including but not limited to (1) a digital signature;
22 (2) a faxed version of an original handwritten signature; or (3) an electronically scanned and
23 transmitted (for example by PDF document) version of an original handwritten signature.
24 b. Each electronic signature affixed or attached to this Amendment (1) is deemed
25 equivalent to a valid original handwritten signature of the person signing this Amendment for all
26 purposes, including but not limited to evidentiary proof in any administrative or judicial
27 proceeding, and (2) has the same force and effect as the valid original handwritten signature of
28 that person.
-2- COUNTY OF FRESNO
Fresno,CA
1 c. The provisions of this section satisfy the requirements of Civil Code section 1633.5,
2 subdivision (b), in the Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (Civil Code, Division 3, Part 2, Title
3 2.5, beginning with section 1633.1).
4 d. Each party using a digital signature represents that it has undertaken and satisfied the
5 requirements of Government Code section 16.5, subdivision (a), paragraphs (1) through (5),
6 and agrees that each other party may rely upon that representation.
7 e. This Amendment is not conditioned upon the parties conducting the transactions under it
8 by electronic means and either party may sign this Amendment with an original handwritten
9 signature.
10 8. This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which is an original, and all of
11 which together constitute this Amendment.
12 9. The Agreement as amended by this Amendment I is ratified and continued. All
13 provisions of the Agreement and not amended by this Amendment I remain in full force and effect.
14
15
16 ///
17 ///
18 ///
19
20
21 ///
22 ///
23 ///
24
25
26 ///
27 ///
28
-3- COUNTY OF FRESNO
Fresno,CA
1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment I to Agreement No.
2 21-066 as of the day and year first hereinabove written.
3
4 CONTRACTOR COUNTY OF FRESNO
5 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,
FRESNO FOUNDATION
11/13/2023
YYY !
7 (Authorized Signature) Sal uin o, C airman of the Board of
8 Joy J. Goto Sup ors e County of Fresno
9 Print Name
Interim Dean of Research & Grad St.
10 Title (Chairman of Board, or President, or ATTEST:
11 CEO) Bernice E. Seidel
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
12 11/14/2023 County of Fresno, State of California
13 (Authorized Signature)
By:
14 Keith Kompsi Deputy
Print Name
15
Director of Fdn. Fin. Ser.
16 Title (Secretary of Corporation, or Chief
17 Financial Officer/Treasurer, or any
Assistant Secretary or Treasurer)
18
19
MAILING ADDRESS:
20 4910 N. Chestnut Ave.
21 M/S OF 123
Fresno, CA 93726
22
23
24
25
26 FOR ACCOUNTING USE ONLY:
27 Fund/Subclass: 0001/10000
Organization: 56304793
28 Account/Program: 7295/0
-4- COUNTY OF FRESNO
Fresno,CA
Revised Exhibit A- Page 1 of 4
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
ORGANIZATION: California State University, Fresno Foundation
Social Research Institute
SERVICE: Evaluation for The Lodge Innovation Program
OFFICE ADDRESS: 4910 N Chestnut Ave
Fresno, CA 93726
OFFICE TELEPHONE: (559) 278-2234 Sociology Department
(559) 960-0595 Personal Cell
CONTACT(S): Timothy J. Kubal, PhD., Director of Social Research Institute
CONTRACT PERIOD: Effective Upon Execution—June 30, 2025
AMOUNT: Effective Upon Execution—June 30, 2021: $21,447
FY 21-22: $ 50,557
FY 22-23: $ 46,516
FY 23-24: $ 50,000
FY 24-25: $ 50,000
Total: $ 218,520
A. SUMMARY OF SERVICES
CONTRACTOR, hereinafter referred to as "Evaluator", shall provide an evaluation of The
Lodge, an innovation program in which daily operations are run by RH Community
Builders. The Lodge, a research targeted engagement approach, serves individuals who
are homeless or at risk of homelessness and have an early onset of a severe mental
illness or a chronic mental illness, who are in a pre-contemplation stage of change, thus
not engaged in care. The evaluation will not evaluate all aspects of The Lodge program,
but will instead analyze two program outcomes: Did the program increase individuals
served engagement in care services? Did the program change attitudes among
stakeholders and participants about peer facilitators?The work shall be completed by
using the data provided to the evaluator by the Fresno County Department of
Behavioral Health (DBH).
Revised Exhibit A- Page 2 of 4
B. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES
Evaluator shall perform the activities below.
1) Provide advice about data collection
a. Evaluator shall review and suggest edits for data collection instruments prior
to data collection by The Lodge staff(hereafter "provider") actually begins.
This includes both quantitative and qualitative instruments already included
in the proposal as well as instruments that may be later used in the project.
This may entail advising work by the Evaluator with DBH and the provider to
advise them regarding training their own staff for proper data collection. The
provider will work with the evaluator and DBH to assess the best method of
communicating the data to the evaluator.
b. Evaluator's review of the data collection shall occur informally throughout
the five-year process, but more formally, during each of the annual reports.
2) Analysis of the Data
a. Evaluator shall analyze the data provided by DBH and the provider that
address the research questions.
b. The Evaluator shall not collect data or decide on individual program eligibility
or have access to names or identifying information of The Lodge participants.
c. The Evaluator shall not be involved in any way in any sort of decisions about
individual referrals or delivery service to any individuals served.
d. The evaluator's analysis shall be based on the data provided.
e. The evaluator shall address the research questions by providing both simple
and advanced analysis of data on the individuals admitted to the program
(i.e. intake data, personal medical records, the quantitative and qualitative
data collected by the provider about each of the individuals served).
throughout their stay in the program and exit interviews.
f. Evaluators shall analyze research questions that seek to explain two things:
1) The willingness of individuals served to access treatment (i.e.
"engagement") and 2) the staff and individuals' interpretation of peer
facilitators.
1. What explains the variation in the individuals served's willingness to
access mental health treatment (i.e. how do we explain their level of
engagement)?
• Does addressing an individuals' basic needs (as per the Maslow
Hierarchy of Needs) through the uses of a low-barrier Lodge
setting shape engagement of clients?
• What role do trained peers applying motivational interviewing in
such a setting play in shaping engagement?
Revised Exhibit A- Page 3 of 4
• What role do other factors (such as individual histories and
demographic factors) have in explaining the variation in
engagement?
• How do individuals served describe and explain their own
decisions about levels of engagement?
2. Does the program influence the perception of peer facilitators among
participants and stakeholders?
• Evaluator shall provide support to answering this question by
providing advice on the provider's pre and post survey that will be
distributed among the relevant population of participants and
stakeholders.
• Evaluator should be able to answer this question definitely, that
is, if relevant data is collected at the beginning and end of the
project, and they have individual tracking markers, they will be
able to explain quantitatively why perceptions have (or have not)
changed based on demographic and other important questions
also asked in the survey.
g. The Evaluator shall address the innovation questions from the program by
using intake and ongoing data from individuals served, as well as records
from peer facilitators; data collection will be completed by the provider
and/or DBH.
h. The Evaluator shall address the innovation questions from the program by
collecting intake and ongoing data from individuals served, as well as records
from peer facilitators.
i. Evaluator shall statistically explain the individual's perception about how
much each factor facilitated their engagement with care.
j. Evaluator shall statistically explain how objective variables such as time in the
program and amount of exposure to motivational interviewing have on
individuals' engagement with care.
k. Evaluator shall statistically explain how demographic factors and exposure to
peer facilitators shape individuals served and stakeholders' perceptions of
the idea of peer facilitators.
3) Provide written reports
a. The data analysis for this evaluation shall be communicated from the
Evaluator to DBH through annual written reports, as well as a final report at
the end of the five-year term.
b. The Evaluator will produce four annual reports and the one final report of
the data that address the research questions in the proposal, and a final
research report at the end of year three that synthesizes the three annual
reports, assesses the research questions after looking at all of the data, and
offers suggestions about program viability.
Revised Exhibit A- Page 4 of 4
c. Each of the reports shall include both a short executive summary, and full
detailed analysis (with supporting documentation of data in appendices).
The reports will be based on the analyses described in the previous section.
d. Additional reports/outcomes may also be requested by the COUNTY's DBH
and/or State, as needed.
4) Provide assistance in communication of findings
a. Evaluator shall work with and assist DBH with communicating the produced
research findings to stakeholders, public, and social media.
b. Evaluator shall help DBH to both interpret the findings and craft effective
public communication, as well as providing an Evaluator representative to
attend meetings where they will help DBH disseminate the findings.
5) Compliance with County
Evaluators shall comply with all contract monitoring and compliance protocols,
procedures, data collection methods, and reporting requirements conducted by the
COUNTY.
6) Participate in DBH and Third-Party Meetings
Evaluator's staff shall participate in meetings to discuss the program, contracts
issues or data findings when requested by DBH or provider. DBH shall coordinate the
meetings.
C. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES
County shall:
1) Participate in monthly meetings with Evaluator to discuss program, contractual
issues, and/or findings. Meetings frequency may be changed after the first year of
implementation. DBH will be responsible for coordination of these meetings.
2) Participate in evaluation of the progress of the overall program and the efficiency of
the collaboration with Evaluator's staff and will be available to Evaluator for ongoing
consultation.
3) Gather outcome information from Evaluator throughout each term of this
Agreement. COUNTY DBH staff shall notify the Evaluator when its participation is
required. The performance outcome measurement process will not be limited to
survey instruments but also include, as appropriate, client and staff interviews, chart
reviews, and other methods of obtaining required information.
4) DBH shall include Evaluator's staff in DBH trainings that are relevant to the services
as described in this Agreement, if there is sufficient space available, at no cost.
Revised Exhibit C- Page 1 of 6
Evaluation for The Lodge Innovation Program
California State University, Fresno Foundation
July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024
PROGRAM EXPENSES
1000:SALARIES&BENEFITS
Employee Salaries
Acct# Position FTE Admin Direct Total
1101 Evaluator-Dr.Timothy Kubal 0.31 $ - $ 32,000 $ 32,000
1102 Evaluator-Dr.Amber Crowell 0.02 - 1,411 1,411
1103 Evaluator-Victoria Kubal 0.03 - 2,070 2,070
1104 IStudent Research Assistant 0.13 - 4200, 4,200
Personnel Salaries Subtotall 0.49 1 $ $ 39,681 $ 39,681
Payroll Taxes&Expenses:
Acct# Description Admin Direct Total
1204 Fringe @ 10% - 3,548 3,548
1205 Student Fringe @ 2.23%(Workers Comp & UI) - 94 94
Payroll Taxes&Expenses Subtotal: $ $ 3,642 $ 3,642
EMPLOYEE SALARIES&BENEFITS TOTAL: $ $ 43,323 $ 43,323
3000:OPERATING EXPENSES
Acct# Line Item Description Amount
3003 lOffice, Household & Program Supplies 155
OPERATING EXPENSES TOTAL: $ 155
6000:ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Acct# Line Item Description Amount
6001 jAdministrative Overhead 1 6,522
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES TOTAL $ 6,522
TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSES $ 50,000
PROGRAM FUNDING SOURCES
8300-MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE ACT(MHSA)
Acct# MHSA Component MHSA Program Name Amount
8303 1 INN - Innovations The Lodge 50,000
MHSA TOTAL $ 50,000
TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDING SOURCES: $ 50,000
NET PROGRAM COST: $ -
Revised Exhibit C-Page 2 of 6
Evaluation for The Lodge Innovation Program
California State University, Fresno Foundation
July 1,2023 to June 30,2024 Budget Narrative
ACCT#I LINE ITEM AMT DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS BUDGETED IN EACH ACCOUNT LINE
1000:SALARIES&BENEFITS 43,323
Employee Salaries 39,681
1101 Evaluator-Dr.Timothy Kubal 32,000 Estimated Fresno State Salary-$75.47*1360 hours(academic year)_$102,648
Difference due to rounding.Actual salary rate is$75.4764706.
Estimated FTE on Evaluation Contract-$32,000/$102,648=0.31 FTE
Provides advisory and research services,and managing the evaluation as director of
the Social Research Institute. Specialties include social psychology,homelessness,
basic quantitative methods,and advanced qualitative methods. Management
duties include,among other things,facilitating communication and paperwork
among all relevant parties.
"Advisory and research services"refers to many different tasks,all of which are
directed toward producing an excellent,scientifically-sound evaluation that fully
and accurately completes the scope of work for 3 annual reports,including tasks
such as referencing scientific literature,producing and evaluating data instruments,
cleaning data to prepare for analysis,analyzing data,evaluating data analyzed,
writing scientific reports,writing public reports,and evaluating data collection
procedures.
1102 Evaluator-Dr.Amber Crowell 1,411 Estimated Fresno State Salary-$66.75*1360 hours(academic year)_$90,780
Estimated FTE on Evaluation Contract-$1,411/$90,780 =0.02 FTE
Provides advisory and research services,with a specialty in demography,inequality,
and advanced quantitative methods
"Advisory and research services"refers to many different tasks,all of which are
directed toward producing an excellent,scientifically-sound evaluation that fully
and accurately completes the scope of work for 3 annual reports,including tasks
such as referencing scientific literature,producing and evaluating data instruments,
cleaning data to prepare for analysis,analyzing data,evaluating data analyzed,
writing scientific reports,writing public reports,and evaluating data collection
procedures.
1103 Evaluator-Victoria Kubal 2,070 Estimated Fresno State Salary-$45*1360 hours(academic year)_$61,200
Estimated FTE on Evaluation Contract-$2,070/$61,200=0.03 FTE
Provides advisory and research services,with a specialty in managing evaluations,
and advanced quantitative methods.
"Advisory and research services"refers to many different tasks,all of which are
directed toward producing an excellent,scientifically-sound evaluation that fully
and accurately completes the scope of work for 3 annual reports,including tasks
such as referencing scientific literature,producing and evaluating data instruments,
cleaning data to prepare for analysis,analyzing data,evaluating data analyzed,
writing scientific reports,writing public reports,and evaluating data collection
procedures.
1104 Student Research Assistant 4,200 Estimated Fresno State Salary-$15.50*2080 hours(academic year)_$32,240
Estimated FTE on Evaluation Contract-$4,200/$32,240 =0.13 FTE
Provides clerical and communications support,as well as providing simple research
tasks such as preliminary cleaning of the data.
Payroll Taxes&Expenses: 3,642
Revised Exhibit C-Page 3 of 6
ACCT# LINE ITEM AMT DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS BUDGETED IN EACH ACCOUNT LINE
1204 Fringe @ 10% 3,548 Fringe for additional employment hours and other employee are calculated at 10-
percent to cover the expense of employment taxes.This is a cost estimate as rates
fluctuate.Rate covers the cost of workers compensation,unemployment insurance,
FICA and Medicare
$35,481*.10=$3,548
1205 Student Fringe @ 2.23%(Workers Comp&UI) 94 Fringe for Student Assistant covers unemployment insurance and workers
compensation.
$4,200*.0223=$94
3000:OPERATING EXPENSES 155
3003 Office,Household&Program Supplies 155 Costs for office supplies include,but are not limited,to:Printer toner,paper,pens,
notepads,peripheral devices associated with technological needs,and copier fees.
6000:ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 6,522
6001 Administrative Overhead 6,522 Administrative Overhead has been calculated at the university approved rate of
15%for contractual services with a county agency.
$43,478*.15=$6,522
TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSE FROM BUDGET NARRATIVE: 50,000
TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSES FROM BUDGET TEMPLATE: 50,000
Revised Exhibit C-4 of 6
Evaluation for The Lodge Innovation Program
California State University, Fresno Foundation
July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025
PROGRAM EXPENSES
1000:SALARIES&BENEFITS
Employee Salaries
Acct# Position FTE Admin Direct Total
1101 Evaluator- Dr.Timothy Kubal 0.31 $ - $ 32,000 $ 32,000
1102 Evaluator- Dr.Amber Crowell 0.02 - 1,411 1,411
1103 Evaluator-Victoria Kubal 0.03 - 2,070 2,070
1104 IStudent Research Assistant 0.13 - 4,200 1 4,200
Personnel Salaries Subtotal 0.49 $ - $ 39,681 $ 39,681
Payroll Taxes&Expenses:
Acct# Description Admin Direct Total
1201 OASDI $ - $ - $ -
1202 FICA/MEDICARE -
1203 SUI - - -
1204 1 Fringe @ 10% - 3,548 3,548
1205 Student Fringe @ 2.23% (Workers Comp& UI) - 94 94
1206 Other(Specify) -
Payroll Taxes&Expenses Subtotal: $ - $ 3,642 $ 3,642
EMPLOYEE SALARIES&BENEFITS TOTAL: $ - $ 43,323 $ 43,323
3000:OPERATING EXPENSES
Acct# Line Item Description Amount
3003 lOffice, Household& Program Supplies 155
OPERATING EXPENSES TOTAL: $ 155
6000:ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Acct# Line Item Description Amount
6001 jAdministrative Overhead $ 6,522
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES TOTAL $ 6,522
TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSES $ 50,000
PROGRAM FUNDING SOURCES
8300-MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE ACT(MHSA)
Acct# MHSA Component MHSA Program Name Amount
8303 INN-Innovations The Lodge 50,000
MHSA TOTAL $ 50,000
TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDING SOURCES: 1 $ 50,000
NET PROGRAM COST: $ -
Revised Exhibit C-5 of 6
Evaluation for The Lodge Innovation Program
California State University, Fresno Foundation
July 1,2024 to June 30,2025 Budget Narrative
ACCT#I LINE ITEM AMT DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS BUDGETED IN EACH ACCOUNT LINE
1000:SALARIES&BENEFITS 43,323
Employee Salaries 39,681
1101 Evaluator-Dr.Timothy Kubal 32,000 Estimated Fresno State Salary-$75.47*1360 hours(academic year)_$102,648
Difference due to rounding.Actual salary rate is$75.4764706.
Estimated FTE on Evaluation Contract-$32,000/$102,648=0.31 FTE
Provides advisory and research services,and managing the evaluation as director o
the Social Research Institute. Specialties include social psychology,homelessness,
basic quantitative methods,and advanced qualitative methods. Management
duties include,among other things,facilitating communication and paperwork
among all relevant parties.
"Advisory and research services"refers to many different tasks,all of which are
directed toward producing an excellent,scientifically-sound evaluation that fully
and accurately completes the scope of work for 3 annual reports,including tasks
such as referencing scientific literature,producing and evaluating data instruments,
cleaning data to prepare for analysis,analyzing data,evaluating data analyzed,
writing scientific reports,writing public reports,and evaluating data collection
procedures.
1102 Evaluator-Dr.Amber Crowell 1,411 Estimated Fresno State Salary-$66.75*1360 hours(academic year)_$90,780
Estimated FTE on Evaluation Contract-$1,411/$90,780 =0.02 FTE
Provides advisory and research services,with a specialty in demography,inequality,
and advanced quantitative methods
"Advisory and research services"refers to many different tasks,all of which are
directed toward producing an excellent,scientifically-sound evaluation that fully
and accurately completes the scope of work for 3 annual reports,including tasks
such as referencing scientific literature,producing and evaluating data instruments,
cleaning data to prepare for analysis,analyzing data,evaluating data analyzed,
writing scientific reports,writing public reports,and evaluating data collection
procedures.
1103 Evaluator-Victoria Kubal 2,070 Estimated Fresno State Salary-$45*1360 hours(academic year)_$61,200
Estimated FTE on Evaluation Contract-$2,070/$61,200=0.03 FTE
Provides advisory and research services,with a specialty in managing evaluations,
and advanced quantitative methods.
"Advisory and research services"refers to many different tasks,all of which are
directed toward producing an excellent,scientifically-sound evaluation that fully
and accurately completes the scope of work for 3 annual reports,including tasks
such as referencing scientific literature,producing and evaluating data instruments,
cleaning data to prepare for analysis,analyzing data,evaluating data analyzed,
writing scientific reports,writing public reports,and evaluating data collection
procedures.
1104 Student Research Assistant 4,200 Estimated Fresno State Salary-$15.50*2080 hours(academic year)_$32,240
Estimated FTE on Evaluation Contract-$4,200/$32,240 =0.13 FTE
Provides clerical and communications support,as well as providing simple research
tasks such as preliminary cleaning of the data.
Revised Exhibit C-6 of 6
ACCT#I LINE ITEM AMT DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS BUDGETED IN EACH ACCOUNT LINE
Payroll Taxes&Expenses: 3,642
1204 Fringe @ 10% 3,548 Fringe for additional employment hours and other employee are calculated at 10-
percent to cover the expense of employment taxes.This is a cost estimate as rates
fluctuate.Rate covers the cost of workers compensation,unemployment
insurance,FICA and Medicare
$35,481*.10=$3,548
1205 Student Fringe @ 2.23%(Workers Comp&UI) 94 Fringe for Student Assistant covers unemployment insurance and workers
compensation.
$4,200*.0223=$93
1206 Other(Specify)
3000:OPERATING EXPENSES 155
3003 Office,Household&Program Supplies 155 Costs for office supplies include,but are not limited,to:Printer toner,paper,pens,
notepads,peripheral devices associated with technological needs,and copier fees.
6000:ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 6,522
6001 Administrative Overhead 6,522 Administrative Overhead has been calculated at the university approved rate of
15%for contractual services with a county agency.
$43,478*.15=$6,522
TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSE FROM BUDGET NARRATIVE: 50,000
TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSES FROM BUDGET TEMPLATE: 50,000