Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgreement A-16-445-1 with Geo-Logic Associates Inc..pdfPage 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANT AGREEMENT (Agreement No. 16-445, hereinafter called the “AGREEMENT”) is made and entered into this _____ day of ________, 2021, by and between the County of Fresno, a political subdivision of the State of California (hereinafter called the “COUNTY”) and Geo-Logic Associates, a California Corporation, whose address is 2777 East Guasti Road, Ontario, CA 91761 (hereinafter called the “CONSULTANT”). RECITALS WHEREAS, COUNTY and CONSULTANT entered into Agreement No. 16-445 (AGREEMENT) on July 12, 2016, pursuant to which CONSULTANT agreed to provide engineering services necessary and to perform Design, Environmental, Geotechnical, Construction Quality Assurance and Construction Management Services for the American Avenue Disposal Site Phase I Clean Closure (PROJECT); and WHEREAS, the AGREEMENT has been extended twice in writing and is currently set to expire by its terms on July 12, 2021; and WHEREAS, the PROJECT is not yet complete; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the COUNTY to retain the services of the CONSULTANT to maintain continuity of the design of the PROJECT; and NOW, THEREFORE, the CONSULTANT and COUNTY hereby agree to amend the AGREEMENT for the PROJECT, as follows: 1.Article IV, Section A of the AGREEMENT is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: “A. This First Amendment to the AGREEMENT (AMENDMENT) shall go into effect, retroactive to July 12, 2021. As hereby amended, the term of the AGREEMENT is hereby further extended by an additional three years and therefore shall expire on July 12, 2024, unless prior to its expiration, the term of the AGREEMENT is further extended in writing, for no more than two additional one-year terms, by mutual consent of the Department of Public Works and Planning Director or designee and the CONSULTANT.” 2.PROJECT’s Schedule (Exhibit C) is hereby amended to include Exhibit C-1, 21-0489 Agreement No. 16-445-1 13th July Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. All references to Exhibit C throughout the entirety of the AGREEMENT shall be deemed to include to Exhibit C-1. 3. CONSULTANT’s PROJECT team (Exhibit B) is hereby amended to include Exhibit B-1, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. All references to Exhibit B throughout the entirety of the AGREEMENT shall be deemed to include Exhibit B-1. 4. CONSULTANT’s Fee Schedule (Exhibit E) is hereby amended to include Exhibit E- 1, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. All references to Exhibit E throughout the entirety of the AGREEMENT shall be deemed to include Exhibit E-1. 5. All other provisions, terms, covenants, conditions and provisions contained in the AGREEMENT are unaffected by this First AMENDMENT to the AGREEMENT and shall remain in full force and effect. 6. The parties agree that this AMENDMENT may be executed by electronic signature as provided in this section. An “electronic signature” means any symbol or process intended by an individual signing this AMENDMENT to represent their signature, including but not limited to (1) a digital signature; (2) a faxed version of an original handwritten signature; or (3) an electronically scanned and transmitted (for example by PDF document) of a handwritten signature. Each electronic signature affixed or attached to this AMENDMENT (1) is deemed equivalent to a valid original handwritten signature of the person signing this AMENDMENT for all purposes, including but not limited to evidentiary proof in any administrative or judicial proceeding, and (2) has the same force and effect as the valid original handwritten signature of that person. The provisions of this section satisfy the requirements of Civil Code section 1633.5, subdivision (b), in the Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (Civil Code, Division 3, Part 2, Title 2.5, beginning with section 1633.1). Each party using a digital signature represents that it has undertaken and satisfied the requirements of Government Code section 16.5, subdivision (a), paragraphs (1) through (5), and agrees that each other party may rely upon that representation. This AMENDMENT is not conditioned upon the parties conducting the transactions under it by electronic means and either party may sign this AMENDMENT with an original handwritten signature. 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties have executed this First Amendment to Agreement 2 on the date first set forth above . 3 4 GEO-LOGIC ASSOCIATES, INC. 5 6 7 8 9 ~~~~ Gary Lass , Pres ident COUN;1~ Steve Brandau , Chairman of the 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2777 East Guasti Road Ontario , CA 91761 FOR ACCOUNTING USE ONLY Org No Account No . Fund No . Subclass No. 9026 7295 0700 15000 Board of Supervisors of the County of Fresno ATTEST: Bernice E. Seidel Clerk of the Board of Supervisors County of Fresno , State of California BY : ~ t_.~ Deputy Page 3 of 3 Rev 4, March 2021 Page 1  Geo‐Logic Associates Proposed Staff American Avenue Disposal Site, Phase I Waste Relocation County of Fresno, Agreement No. 16‐445 Name/Role Year’s Experience Professional Registrations Education Billing Level Hourly Billing RateGary Lass, Principal‐in‐Charge 40+ PG CA #3653  CEG CA #1093 GHG CA #18 M.S., Geochemistry ‐ CA State University, LosAngelesB.S., Geology ‐ CA State University, Los AngelesPRINCIPAL II $265 Frank (Ben) Dell‐Era, Construction Manager 27 NICET Level II, GRI 40 HR HAZWOPER ACI Level I Concrete, Nuclear Gauge TECHNICIAN IV $140 Jacob Russell, Supervising Engineer  21 PE CA #64512 B.S., Environmental Resource Engineering ‐Humboldt State UniversitySUPERVISING PROFESSIONAL $210 Sean Flores, Project Engineer 18 PE CA #39161 PG CA #9422 B.S., Geological Engineering, University ofNevada, RenoPROJECT PROFESSIONAL II $163 Stephanie Hamilton, Project Engineer 11 PE CA #47957 B.S., Civil Engineering, San Jose StateUniversityPROJECT PROFESSIONAL II $163 Aaron Ogorzalek, Project Geotechnical Engineer 17 PE CA #71852 M.S., Geotechnical/ GeoenvironmentalEngineering, Colorado State UniversityB.S., Civil Engineering, University of Missouri‐Rolla  PROJECT PROFESSIONAL III $184 Bryan Fritzler, Principal Technician 29 PE CA #55568 B.S., Civil Engineering, Colorado StateUniversityPRINCIPAL TECHNICIAN $165 Neven Matasovic, Sr. Reviewer, Seismic Characterization  32 PE CA #55861 GE CA #2557 Ph.D., Geotechnical Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles M.S., Geotechnical Engineering,University of Zagreb, CroatiaB.S., Civil Engineering,University of CroatiaPRINCIPAL PROFESSIONAL I $242 Gabe Iltis, Geotechnical 11 EIT OR #74401EIT Ph.D., Environmental Engineering ‐ Oregon PROJECT PROFESSIONAL II $163 EXHIBIT B-1 Rev 4, March 2021 Page 2 Name/Role Year’s Experience Professional Registrations Education Billing Level Hourly Billing RateEngineer 40 HR HAZWOPER State University M.S., Civil Engineering, Colorado StateUniversityB.S., Environmental Engineering, Oregon StateUniversityCourtney Barrett, Sr. Project Engineer 15 PE CA #78076 B.S., Civil and Environmental,University of California, DavisSENIOR PROFESSIONAL I $196 Ryan Berquist, Sr. Engineer/Designer 10 PE CA #77538 B.S., Mechanical Engineering,University of California, Santa BarbaraPROJECT PROFESSIONAL I $142 Noah Campbell, Stormwater Designer  20 PE CA #64963 B.S., Environmental Resource Engineering,Humboldt State UniversitySENIOR PROFESSIONAL I $196 Monte Christie, Sr. Geotechnical Engineer 26 PE CA #58866 GE CA #2630 M.S., Geotechnical Engineering, University ofCalifornia, BerkeleyB.S., Civil Engineering,University of California, Berkeley B.A., Environmental Studies,University of California, Santa CruzSUPERVISING PROFESSIONAL $210 John Hower, Sr. Reviewer, Project Manager 30 PG CA #6524 CEG CA #2142 B.S., Geology, California State University, LongBeach  PRINCIPAL I  $242 Jordan Graham, Staff Engineer 3 PE CA #91799 PE UT #11741591 40 HR HAZWOPER Nuclear Gauge B.S., Civil Engineering, University of California,DavisSTAFF PROFESSIONAL II $115 Nathan Droivold, Staff Engineer 2 EIT CA #158685 40 HR HAZWOPER Nuclear Gauge B.S., Civil Engineering, Loyola MarymountUniversitySTAFF PROFESSIONAL III $126 Vittoria Zucchelli, Staff Engineer 4 EIT B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Florida,TampaSTAFF PROFESSIONAL II $115 Caleb Miller, Sr. Project Engineer 10 PE California #77424 PE Arizona 11973 B.S., Civil Engineering, California StateUniversity, ChicoSENIOR PROFESSIONAL I $196 Richard Mitchell, Sr. 37 PG CA #4390 M.S., Geotechnical Engineering / EngineeringPRINCIPAL PROFESSIONAL $242  Rev 4, March 2021 Page 3 Name/Role Year’s Experience Professional Registrations Education Billing Level Hourly Billing RateReviewer/Regulatory Liaison CEG CA #1371 Geology, University of California, Berkeley B.S. Geology, California State University, Chico Erik Olhoffer, Sr. CQA Monitor 24 40 HR HAZWOPER NICET Cert Level I Nuclear Gauge ACI Concrete – Level I  #561454521 TECHNICIAN II  $98 Jason Heffner, Project Geotechnical Engineer 17 PE CA #71122 PE NV #22563 PE OR #80232 B.S., Geological Engineering ‐ University of NV,RenoPROJECT PROFESSIONAL I $142 Robert Valceschini, ET Cover Specialist 32 PE CA # 50522 M.S., Civil & Geotechnical Engineering,University of Nevada, RenoB.S., Geological Engineering, Mackay School ofMines, University of Nevada, Reno PRINCIPAL PROFESSIONAL $242 Francesca Senes, Staff Geologist 1 B.S., Earth Science ‐ Northeastern IllinoisUniversityM.S., Geology ‐ California State University, SanJose STAFF PROFESSIONAL II $115 Ryan Day, Staff Engineer 1 EIT 40‐HR HAZWOPER B.S., Civil Engineering – California StateUniversity, ChicoSTAFF PROFESSIONAL II $115 Alejandro, Valadez, Staff Engineer 2 40‐HR HAZWOPER MSHA Nuclear Gauge B.S., Civil Engineering – California StateUniversity, ChicoSTAFF PROFESSIONAL II $115 Matthew Needs, Staff Engineer 2 GIT 40‐HR HAZWOPER Nuclear Gauge B.S., Geological Engineering – University ofNevada, RenoSTAFF PROFESSIONAL II $115 David Harich, PE, Sr. Reviewer 30+ PE CA # 53287 MBA, University of California, San Diego BS, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona PRINCIPAL PROFESSIONAL I $242 Newly added staff is highlighted Staff removed: Michael Yacyshyn (Principal I), David Romo (Sr. Professional I), Nathan Droivold (Staff Professional III), Tyler Kurtz (Staff Professional II) Removed staff may still appear on future invoices for work completed, but not yet billed  Vittoria Zucchelli, EIT  Staff Engineer  geo‐logic.com  Ms. Zucchelli is a Staff Engineer in Geo‐Logic who is experienced in  environmental and solid waste engineering experience with a specialty in  landfill gas (LFG) projects involving system design, construction, and  regulatory compliance. Her experience includes Title V Reporting, Title V  Permit Renewal, New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Regulations, Gas  Collection and Control System (GCCS) design, Tier 2 landfill gas sampling, and  construction quality assurance (CQA). Examples of her project experience  include the following:  GCCS) Expansion Designs and Construction Engineering Services, RS and  Advanced Disposal Services (ADS), Various Locations (Listed Below)  Evaluated existing LFG collection coverages based on radiuses of influence for LFG extraction wells, surface emission exceedance locations, and recommendations from the OM&M personnel to design LFG extraction wells to maintain or increase gas collection coverages in areas of the landfill. Evaluated liquid level and depth to bottom measurements and wellhead monitoring data for existing LFG extraction wells to determine whether a well would need to be replaced/redrilled or would require a pump due to regulatory or operational concerns. Designed LFG extraction well depths and materials specifications based on surveyed ground surface elevations and landfill top of protective cover, subgrade, or top of clay layer elevations. Designed LFG collection (header/lateral), air supply, and liquid conveyance piping in order to meet and improve landfill gas operational needs and capabilities. Evaluated predicted LFG collection flows and condensate generation to size and evaluate condensate management systems. Provided cost estimates to be able to keep clients informed based on budgetary requirements. Assessed OM&M and site specific needs and recommendations to design GCCS components that were more durable and sustainable. Reviewed shop drawings and specifications provided by construction contractors to meet the requirements and intentions of the designs. Provided construction management services to provide guidance on the design specifications and intentions and troubleshoot design/field issues that occurred during construction with contractors and CQA personnel. Projects included (Client, Project Name, Location): -ADS, Cedar Hill Landfill, GCCS Improvements, Ragland, Alabama -ADS, Eagle Point Landfill, GCCS Design, Ball Ground, Georgia -ADS, Eagle Point Landfill, Q1‐Q4 GCCS Design, Ball Ground, Georgia EDUCATION  BS, Civil Engineering, 2016  University of South Florida   PROFESSIONAL  REGISTRATIONS  Engineer‐in‐Training,  Georgia, No. EIT027010  CERTIFICATIONS  40‐HR HAZOPER, 2016  PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS  Solid Waste Association of  North America, 2016‐2020  Vittoria Zucchelli, EIT  Page 2  geo‐logic.com  -ADS, Eagle Point Landfill, GCCS Segregation, 18‐Inch Header, Flare Relocation, 36‐Inch Header, Lift Station and Dual‐Contained Forcemain Design, Ball Ground, Georgia -ADS, East Baton Rouge Parish North Landfill, GCCS Design, Baton Rouge, Louisiana -ADS, Evergreen Landfill, GCCS Improvements, Valdosta, Georgia -RS, Hickory Ridge Landfill, GCCS Design and Construction Engineering Services, Conley, Georgia -ADS, Star Ridge Landfill, GCCS Improvements, Moody, Alabama -ADS, Star Ridge Landfill, GCCS Design and Flare Installation, Moody, Alabama -ADS, Stone’s Throw Landfill, GCCS Improvements, Moody, Alabama -ADS, Wolf Creek Landfill, GCCS Design, Dry Branch, Georgia -ADS, Wolf Creek Landfill, GCCS Improvements, Dry Branch, Georgia -ADS, Wolf Creek Landfill, GCCS Design and Construction Engineering Services, Dry Branch, Georgia -RS, Oak Grove Landfill GCCS Design, Winder, Georgia -RS, Oak Grove Landfill, GCCS Design and Construction Engineering Services, Winder, Georgia -RS, Pine Ridge Landfill, GCCS Design, Griffin, Georgia -RS, Pine Ridge Landfill Dewatering System Design, Griffin, Georgia -RS, Pineview Landfill, GCCS Design, Dora, Alabama -RS, Pineview Landfill, GCCS Design and Construction Engineering Services, Dora, Alabama -RS, Richland Creek Landfill, GCCS Design, Buford, Georgia -RS, Richland Creek Landfill, GCCS Design and Construction Engineering Services, Buford, Georgia Five‐Year GCCS Phasing Plans, RS, Various Sites  Prepared GCCS phasing plan drawing sets for future conditions of landfills based on projected landfill waste filling, landfill gas flow rates, and liquids removal rates. Drawings included projected LFG extraction wells, gas collection, air supply, and liquid conveyance piping, abandonments, and other capital expenditures that would be required to meet regulatory and operational requirements. Prepared material and engineering cost estimations to provide to clients to allow them to evaluate their budgetary needs for particular years and to project future landfill gas construction project needs. Sites included:  -RS, Oak Grove Landfill, Winder, Georgia -RS, Pine Ridge Landfill, Griffin, Georgia -RS, Pineview Landfill, Dora, Alabama -RS, Richland Creek Landfill, Buford, Georgia Publications and Presentations Zucchelli, V. 2019. Vertical Extraction Wells: From Past to Present.  Presented at Alabama + Georgia Joint Spring  2019 SWANA Conference. Sponsored by SCS Engineers. April 2, 2019.  Ryan Day, EIT  Staff Engineer  geo‐logic.com  Mr. Day is a recent graduate in Civil Engineering from Chico State University in  Chico, California. While attending the University, he interned for the City of  Walnut Creek, California. While there, he worked for both the traffic and  capital improvement disisions, where he utilized his AutoCAD Civil 3D skills  and provided roadway design, traffic analysis, drainage engineering, and other  tasks.   Kiefer Landfill Module 4, Phase 1, Sacramento County, Sacramento,  California  Provided engineering and CAD support during the construction phase of the  project. Prepared drain pipe CAD drawings for seep locations found during  contruction. Reviewed specifications to assure testing compliance.  Ostrom Road Compost Pad, Recology Ostrom Road, Wheatland, California  Provided CQA support for the compost pad construction. Performed on‐site  testing of cement treated base.  Ash Monofill Stage O, Regional Disposal Company, Roosevelt, Washington  Provided engineering and CAD support for the design of the Stage O area of  the Ash Monofill. Prepared CAD drawings and quantity calculations.  Circle Green Compost Facility, Phelan Pinon Hills Community Services  District, San Bernardino County, California  Provided CAD and engineering support for the design of the Circle Green  Compost Facility. Preparded CAD drawings and preparded the technical  report.  Oliveira Compost Facility, Oliveira Enterprises Inc., Byron, California  Provided CAD and engineering support for the design of the Oliveira Compost  Facility. Preparded CAD drawings and preparded the technical report.  American Avenue Disposal Site, County of Fresno, Kerman, California  Provided CAD and engineering support for the clean closure design of the  American Avenue Disposal Site. Prepared CAD drawings and quantity  calculations.  EDUCATION  Bachelor of Science, Civil  Engineering, 2020  California State University,  Chico  CERTIFICATIONS  Engineer‐in‐Training,  CA  40‐Hr HAZWOPER  PROFESSIONAL TRAINING  AutoCAD and Civil3D  Alejandro Valadez  Staff Engineer  geo‐logic.com  Mr. Valadez is a graduate of California State University, Chico, and holds a  Bachelor’s Degree in Civil Engineering. He has performed a variety of  engineering and field tasks since he was hired by GLA shortly after graduation.  He provides design support in AutoCAD 3D software and assists with a variety  of engineering tasks such as quantity calculations and grading plans. He has  experience providing engineering support for construction projects,  construction quality assurance, and has spent time performing laboratory  tests in GLA’s geotechnical laboratory. He supervised workshops as a STEM  volunteer (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), and was a  part of the MAES Leadership Academy. Mr. Valadez is bilingual in English and  Spanish.  American Avenue Disposal Site Phase I Clean Closure, Fresno, California  Provided engineering and CAD support for the design of Phase 1 Waste  Relocation. Prepared PS&E design documents including detail design drawings  and the waste relocation work plan and figures for the Phase 1 Waste  Relocation.  Johnson Canyon Landfill Module VII Expansion and Compost Pad, Gonzales,  California  Provided engineering and CAD support for subgrade and fill grading plans  including earthwork calculations for Master Plan. Grading included subgrade,  fill waste, access roads, sumps, leachate collection pipes, ditches, and  benches. Also provided support for a leak detection survey by the water  puddle method in accordance with ASTM D7002.  Kiefer Landfill, Sacramento, California  Provided engineering support for a leak detection survey on slopes by the  water puddle method in accordance to ASTM D7002.  Casmalia Superfund Site, Santa Barbara, California  Provided engineering and CAD support for the design of Casmalia Superfund  Site Central Drainage Area Cap. Provided grading plans by preparing plan  drawings using as‐builts.  Florin Perkins Public Disposal Site, Sacramento, California  Provided support for a hydrologic analysis for this closed site. Peformed  hydrology calculations utilizing the TR‐55 method.   East Otay Mesa Landfill Facility, San Diego County, California  Provided engineering and CAD support for the conceptual design of East Otay  Mesa Recycling Collection Center and Facility Landfill. Prepared a drawing set  for a Report of Compost Site Information.  EDUCATION  B.S., Civil Engineering, 2019 California State Univ., Chico PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS  Latinos in Technical Engineers  (LTC)   MAES Latinos in Science and  Engineering  National Society of Leadership  and Success (NSLS)  CERTIFICATIONS  OSHA Hazardous Waste  Operations and Emergency  Response Training (40‐Hour)  U.S. Department of Labor  Mine Safety and Health  Administration (24‐Hour)  Nuclear Gauge Density Testing  (ASTM ‐ 6938)  Alejandro Valadez  Staff Engineer    geo‐logic.com  Washington County Landfill Phase 4D Conceptual Design, Washington City, Utah  Prepared design drawings for Phase 4D conceptual design at the landfill.  Yolo County Landfill, Woodland. California  Utilizied Civil 3D to perform volume analysis between topographic and proposed grading surfaces to provide  options for reducing soil volume in a compost pad.  Recology Ostrom Organics Compost Facility, Yuba County, California  Performed nuclear gauge desity testing for soil and gravel compaction as a part‐time CQA on‐site.   Buttonwillow Landfill, Buttonwillow, California  Provided support in vadose zone monitoring and performed continuity testing.  Neal Road Landfill, Paradise, California  Provided engineering support for a leak detection survey by the dipole method in accordance to ASTM D7007‐ 16.    South Campus Neighborhood Project, The City of Chico, Chico, CA  Produced a proposal with a final report of a safety improvement plan for existing road conditions to satisfy  Caltrans Standards. Responsibilities included:    ‐ Surveying exisiting street conditions.  ‐ Assisting in traffic and speed counts.  ‐ Using AutoCAD to create cross sections and details.  ‐ Estimating project budget.  ‐ Cooperating with professionals and professors to find better solutions.  ‐ Preparing presentation for professionals and professors.   ‐ Writting reports.    Project ultimately proposed ideas for the City of Chico to improve the safety of existing streets located near  school campus.     Matthew Needs, QISP  Staff Engineer    geo‐logic.com  Mr. Needs is a graduate of University of Nevada‐Reno who began his career  with Geo‐Logic Associates in 2017 an intern. He has now transitioned into a  Staff Engineer role in GLA’s Granite Bay, California office. He has worked in  the design of solid waste landfills, construction quality control of landfills,  conducting groundwater sampling and other field work, as well as  conducting ASTM standard geotechnical laboratory tests. He started his  geotechnical engineering career providing laboratory and design support for  open pit mining operations in Nevada. He has experience with liner system  applications including HDPE, GCL, clay, admix soils, geonet, geotextile, and  granular drainage materials. In addition to CQA monitoring of landfill  construction, Mr. Needs assists with the creation of design and detail  drawings for solid waste and composting facilities.  Module 4 Excavation CQA, Sacramento County, Kiefer Landfill   Matthew performed CQA services for the 24 million cubic yard excavation at  Kiefer Landfill and provided real‐time geotechnical recommendations to aid  the contractor in selectively stockpiling excavation soils for future purposes.  He also provided CQA services for a sliver fill located within the cell and  conducted associated compaction and permeability testing, as well as  ensured that the fill and stockpiles met project specifications.  Module 5/13 Separation Liner CQA, Placer County, Western Regional  Landfill  Mr. Needs provided CQA services during subgrade preparation for the  installation of the Module 5/13 liner system. This included reviewing project  submittals, earthworks testing and sampling, working with the contractor to  confirm existing conditions, as well as maintaining a testing catalog that met  the requirements of the project specific specifications.  Phase XX Liner Construction CQA, Republic Services, Ox Mountain Landfill  Mr. Needs provided CQA services for the entirety of the Phase XX  construction at Ox Mountain Landfill. Responsibilities included monitoring,  testing, and sampling during the following activities; rock excavation and  associated earthfill, soil mixture during production of low permeability soil  from an on‐site pug mill, earthworks construction, geosynthetics installation,  upgrade and installation of stormwater control systems, and collection  piping installation.   Phase 4 Liquid Mitigation CQA, Republic Services, Newby Island Landfill  As part of the continuing Liquid Mitigation projects at Newby Island Landfill  Matthew provided CQA services for the deep soil mixture processes during  Phase 4; tasks included logging core of the intermixed concrete and waste  cylinders to ensure they would comply with project specifications for  strength testing.    EDUCATION  B.S. Geological Engineering,  2019, University of Nevada,  Reno   PROFESSIONAL Training  AutoCad and Civil 3D  gINT – Geotechnical Software  CERTIFICATIONS  Qualified Industrial  Stormwater Practitioner  (QISP) #01775  40‐Hr HAZWOPER  CalGeo Loss Prevention         Matthew Needs  Page 2    geo‐logic.com  Ostrom Road Landfill Compost Pad Permeability, Recology, Ostrom Road Landfill  CQA monitor for the construction of the Ostrom Road Compost Pad, Matthew provided testing services and  documentation during construction of subgrade and two retention ponds.  Casmalia CDA Cap and Area 3 Closure Design, Casmalia Steering Committee, Casmalia Hazardous Waste  Landfill  Mr. Needs provided engineering and CAD support for the design of the Casmalia CDA Cap and Area 3 Closure.  1F‐2F Cell Design, Republic Services, Wasatch Landfill  Prepared design drawings for Phase IF/2EFcell expansion at the landfill. Utilized AutoCad Civil 3D to develop cell  grading, perform quantity take‐offs and volume analyses between topographic surfaces and develop detail  drawings. Mr. Needs also assisted in developing project specifications for the project.  Ariel Budget Models, Republic Services  Mr. Needs assisted in creating aerial budget models for a multitude of landfill operations. He utilized AutoCad  Civil 3D to develop surfaces and determine quantities.  Preliminary Closure/Post‐Closure Maintenance Plan (PCPCMP), Waste Management, Asuza Landfill  Mr. Needs created landfill surfaces and determined quantities between phased development and final closure  grades in order to develop life of landfill estimates.   Regional Sanitary SSBS and DLDS WDR Compliance, Sacramento County, Sacramento Regional Wastewater  Treatment Plant   Mr. Needs installed and replaced Matric Water Potential sensors at the Sacramento Regional Wastewater  Treatment plan as part of GLA’s involvement with confirming that the site is complying with site‐specific WDRs.   East Otay Mesa Landfill JTD Groundwater Sampling, East Otay Mesa Landfill and Recycling, East Otay Mesa  In support of the development of the site JTD, Mr. Needs assisted in the benchmark groundwater sampling for  the site.  Additional Professional Training OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Training (40‐Hour), CalGeo Loss Prevention  Training, First Aid and CPR Certified.      David Harich, PE  Principal Engineer    geo‐logic.com  Mr. Harich has 30 years of experience of domestic and international  experience in solid waste disposal operations, engineering, construction  management and groundwater development. Results‐oriented leader with  excellent skills in negotiating, communicating, and developing cost effective  solutions for engineering projects and disposal operations. Bilingual with  many years’ experience in public speaking and presentations with state and  local governments.  Waste Management Inc., Corona, California  As Senior District Manager from 2014 to 2020, Mr. Harich managed the El  Sobrante Landfill with over $100 million in annual revenue, 70,000 tons per  week of Municipal Solid Waste, and general oversight of 45 employees.   Provide leadership and cross‐functional management for all departments  including Site Operations, Engineering, Landfill Gas Operations, Environmental  Compliance, Public Relations, Fleet Maintenance and Wildlife Habitat  Conservation. Oversee pricing, cost controls, and regulatory compliance.  Key Achievements:   Developed one of the largest solid waste landfills in the country and  grew revenue from $60 million to $103 million in five years.  Introduced new surveying tools to improve operational efficiency.  Negotiated Collective Bargaining Agreement with Union.  Renegotiated operating permit with County Lead Agency.  Developed and launched Southern California Heavy Equipment Rodeo  competition. Republic Services, San Antonio, Texas  As the Environmental Manager from 2013 to 2014, Mr. Harich managed the  Engineering and Environmental Compliance for six regional South Texas  landfills.  Responsible for capital budget, new construction of landfill cells and  landfill gas collection systems.  Worked with Texas Commission on  Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for permitting oilfield waste.    Key Achievements:   Developed new method for on‐site handling of Oil Exploration and  Production waste saving millions in landfill airspace consumption.   Managed new landfill cell construction capital budget and construction  quality control at several landfills.   Collaborated on landfill closure design and remediation at two landfills.  Harich Enterprises Company, Inc. Running Springs, California As the President and CEO from 1999 to 2013, Mr. Harich created his own well  drilling construction company. Bid on public works projects for municipal  supply and agricultural production wells. Managed payables and receivables.  Created asset allocation strategies.  Designed pump development and aquifer  yield programs.  Drilled monitoring wells on several southern California    EDUCATION  MBA, University of California,  San Diego, 1999  BS, Civil Engineering,  California State Polytechnic  University, Pomona, 1990  PROFESSIONAL  REGISTRATIONS  Professional Engineer,  California, No. C53287  PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS  General A & C57 contractor’s  license   Waste water collections  operator ‐ CWEA  Water treatment &  distribution operator ‐ CDPH  Member United States  Environmental Training  Institute  Won 1987 CIWMB award for  "Best Large Volume Recycler  at a Landfill or Transfer  Station"  Director for Temescal Valley  Water District    David Harich, PE  Page 2    geo‐logic.com  landfills.  Served one year as General Manager for Arrowbear Park County Water District.  Key Achievements:   Created company and grew revenue from $0 to $6million in ten years.   Completed projects for residential commercial water supply.   Completed temporary water supply project for $2 billion expansion at 29 Palms Marine Corps. Base.  Waste Management Inc., Latin America As the Latin American Landfill Manager from 1994 – 1999, he managed four solid waste landfills for Waste  Management in Latin America.  Developed team of people and trained them in proper landfilling techniques  including cut and cover, compaction, landfill gas collection, leachate collection, and storm water collection.  Developed new landfill in Acapulco, Mexico from conception. Conducted business negotiations with local and  state governments and regulators. Created and implemented budgets for all sites.   Key Achievements:   Closed several burn dumps as requested by local governments.   Designed Tijuana Landfill and trained site personnel on operations.   Gave presentations to State and Local governments on proper solid waste management.   Received award from United States Environmental Training Institute.  Bryan A. Stirrat and Associates, Diamond Bar, California As Project Engineer from 1990 – 1994, he developed and designed new cell construction, GCCS systems, LCRS  systems, composite liner systems, and closure systems.  Performed field engineering tasks and construction  management on existing landfills. Developed new technique for preparing cut slopes for geotextile and HDPE  liners systems.  IDTask NameDuration Start Finish Predecessors1TASK 5: DEVELOP WASTE RELOCATION CONSTRUCTION PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE735 daysMon 6/29/20Fri 4/21/232Prepare Revised 90% PS&E160 daysMon 6/29/20Fri 2/5/213 County Review of Revised 90% PS&E100 daysMon 2/8/21Fri 6/25/2124Respond to County Comments and Prepare 100% PS&E20 daysMon 6/28/21Fri 7/23/2135Call to Present 100% PS&E to County0 daysFri 7/23/21Fri 7/23/2146 County Review of 100% PS&E15 daysMon 7/26/21Fri 8/13/2157Prepare Final PS&E10 daysMon 8/16/21Fri 8/27/2168Bidding and Award110 daysMon 8/30/21Fri 1/28/2279Construction (assumes 52 weeks total including weather delays)260 daysMon 1/31/22Fri 1/27/23810Contract Closeout60 daysMon 1/30/23Fri 4/21/2397/235/316/146/287/127/268/98/239/69/2010/410/1811/111/1511/2912/1312/271/101/242/72/213/73/214/44/185/25/165/306/136/277/117/258/88/229/59/1910/310/1710/3111/1411/2812/1212/261/91/232/62/203/63/204/34/175/15/155/296/126/267/107/248/78/219/49/1810/210/1610/3011/1311/2712/1112/251/81/222/52/193/53/194/24/164/305/1JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayTaskSplitMilestoneSummaryProject SummaryExternal TasksExternal MilestoneInactive MilestoneInactive SummaryManual TaskDuration-onlyManual Summary RollupManual SummaryStart-onlyFinish-onlyExternal TasksExternal MilestoneProgressDeadlineAmerican Avenue Disposal SitePhase I Waste RelocationPage 1Project: Draft AADS Schedule Task 5_7_R2_060Date: Fri 6/4/21EXHIBIT C-1 FRESNO COUNTY 2019 & 2020 FEE SCHEDULE PROFESSIONAL STAFF UNIT RATE Staff Professional I ...................................................................................................................... $105.00/Hour Staff Professional II ....................................................................................................................... 115.00/Hour Staff Professional III ...................................................................................................................... 126.00/Hour Project Professional I .................................................................................................................... 142.00/Hour Project Professional II ................................................................................................................... 163.00/Hour Project Professional III .................................................................................................................. 184.00/Hour Senior Professional I ..................................................................................................................... 196.00/Hour Supervising Professional/Senior Professional II ............................................................................ 210.00/Hour Principal Professional I ................................................................................................................. 242.00/Hour Principal Professional II ................................................................................................................ 265.00/Hour Court Appearance (Expert Witness, Deposition, etc.; four-hour minimum) ............................ 2 x HourlyRate FIELD/LABORATORY STAFF Technician I ..................................................................................................................................... 84.00/Hour Technician II .................................................................................................................................... 94.00/Hour Technician III (or Minimum Prevailing Wage) ............................................................................... 105.00/Hour Technician IV ................................................................................................................................ 140.00/Hour Laboratory Manager ..................................................................................................................... 155.00/Hour Principal Technician ...................................................................................................................... 165.00/Hour CADD/GIS CADD/GIS/Database Manager I .................................................................................................... 100.00/Hour CADD/GIS/Database Manager II ................................................................................................... 115.00/Hour CADD Designer .............................................................................................................................. 126.00/Hour GIS Specialist ................................................................................................................................. 142.00/Hour SUPPORT STAFF Administrative Assistant I ............................................................................................................... 80.00/Hour Administrative Assistant II .............................................................................................................. 95.00/Hour Technical Editor ............................................................................................................................ 100.00/Hour Senior Technical Editor ................................................................................................................. 126.00/Hour *Overtime Premium is 35% of PERSONNEL CHARGE EQUIPMENT CHARGES BAT Permeameter .......................................................................................................................... 200.00/Day Compaction Testing Equipment & Supplies ..................................................................................... 50.00/Day Peel & Shear Strength Apparatus (FML Seams) ......................................................................... 900.00/Month Portable Laboratory (8’ x 32’ trailer) with equipment ................................................................ 1,200/Month Portable Laboratory (mobilization / demobilization) .......................................................................... 1,500.00 ReMi/Refraction Seismograph ........................................................................................................ 600.00/Day Sealed Single Ring Infiltrometer (SSRI) .............................................................. 200.00/Day or 750.00/Month Sealed Double Ring Infiltrometer (SDRI) ..................................................................................... Call for Quote Slope Inclinometer.......................................................................................................................... 250.00/Day EXPENSES Vehicle Use for Field Services ............................................................................... 14.00/Hour or 320.00/week Soil Sampling Equipment & Drilling Supplies .................................................................................... 5.00/Hour Groundwater Sampling Equipment and Supplies ........................................................................... 15.00/Hour Per Diem ............................................................................ Lesser of (Cost +15%) or (Local Government Rate) Outside Services (Consultants, Surveys, Chemical lab Tests, etc.)................................................... Cost + 15% Reimbursables (Maps, Photos, Permits, Expendable Supplies, etc.) ............................................... Cost + 15% Outside Equipment (Drill Rig, Backhoe, Monitoring Equipment, etc.) ............................................ Cost + 15% <continued on next page> EXHIBIT E-1 PERMITS, FEES AND BONDS The costs of all permits, fees, and performance bonds required by government agencies are to be paid by the Client, unless stated otherwise in an accompanying proposal. INSURANCE Geo-Logic Associates, Inc. carries workers' compensation, comprehensive general liability and automobile with policy limits normally acceptable to most clients. The cost for this insurance is covered by the fees listed in this schedule. Cost of any special insurance required by the Client, including increases in policy limits, adding additional insured parties and waivers of subrogation, are charged at cost plus 15%. Unless otherwise stated, such charges are in addition to the estimated or maximum charges stated in any accompanying proposal. TERMS Payment is due upon presentation of invoice and is past due thirty (30) days from invoice date. Past due accounts are subject to a finance charge of one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) per month, or the maximum rate allowed by law. PROPOSAL PERIOD Unless otherwise stated, a proposal accompanying this schedule is effective for sixty (60) days. If authorization to proceed is not received within this period, Geo-Logic Associates, Inc. reserves the right to renegotiate the fee. FRESNO COUNTY 2019 & 2020 FEE SCHEDULE SOIL TESTING TEST METHOD UNIT RATE Atterberg Limits (LL, PL, and PI) ................................................................D4318 ........................ $150.00/Test California Bearing Ratio (excluding moisture-density curve) ...................D1883 ......................... 250.00/Point Chloride Content ............................................................................................................................. 50.00/Test Corrosivity Series (resistivity, pH, sulfate, chloride) ...................................................................... 170.00/Test Consolidation Test (without rate data – up to 8 loading increments) ......D2435 .......................... 150.00/Test Consolidation Test (single point) ..............................................................D2435 ............................ 95.00/Test Consolidation Test Rate Data (per load increment) .................................D2435 ............................60.00/each Direct Shear Test (at natural moisture) ....................................................D3080 ........................... 65.00/Point Direct Shear Test (saturated – strain rate 0.0084 inch/min.) ...................D3080 ........................... 75.00/Point Direct Shear Test (saturated, recycled – strain rate 0.0084 inch/min.) ....D3080 ......................... 120.00/Point Direct Shear Test (consolidated drained) .................................................D3080 ......................... 175.00/Point Direct Shear Test (consolidated drained, residual)...................................D3080 ......................... 200.00/Point Direct Shear Test (large shear box, 12 x 12) .............................................D3080 ......................... 300.00/Point Expansion Index Test ................................................................................D4829 .......................... 125.00/Test Expansion Index (cement or lime treated sample) ...................................D4829 .......................... 175.00/Test Grain-Size Mechanical Analysis - Sand-Clay, including Hydrometer.........D422/D6913/D7928 .... 150.00/Test Grain-Size Mechanical Analysis - Gravel-Clay, including Hydrometer ......D422/D6913/D7928 .... 200.00/Test Harvard Miniature Compaction Test ............................................................................................. 250.00/Test Mechanical Analysis, Percent Passing #200..............................................D1140/C117 .................. 75.00/Test Mechanical Analysis - Sand or Gravel (no wash) ......................................D422/D6913/C136......... 85.00/Test Mechanical Analysis - Sand and Gravel ....................................................D422/D6913/C136....... 155.00/Test Mechanical Analysis - Sand or Gravel .......................................................D422/D6913/C136....... 120.00/Test Mechanical Analysis - Minus 3” to 200 Sieve, Full Sieve ..........................D422/D6913/C136....... 155.00/Test Moisture Content .....................................................................................D2216/D4643 ................ 16.00/Test Moisture Density Curve for Compacted Fill (4-inch Mold) .......................D698 ............................ 150.00/Test Moisture Density Curve for Compacted Fill (6-inch Mold) .......................D698 ............................ 175.00/Test Moisture-Density Curve for Compacted Fill (4-inch Mold) .......................D1557 .......................... 165.00/Test Moisture-Density Curve – Compacted Fill (6-inch Mold)..........................D1557 .......................... 200.00/Test Moisture-Density Curve – Lime or Cement Treated (4-inch Mold) ..........D1557 .......................... 210.00/Test Moisture-Density Curve – Lime or Cement Treated (6-inch Mold) ..........D1557 .......................... 250.00/Test Moisture-Density Single Point ..................................................................T272 ............................... 80.00/Test Moisture-Density Curve ............................................................................Cal 216 ......................... 175.00/Test Organic Matter .........................................................................................D2974 ............................ 85.00/Test Permeability (falling head) .......................................................................CAL220 ........................ 180.00/Test Permeability (flexible wall) .......................................................................D5084 .......................... 300.00/Test Permeability (rigid wall - constant head pressure, 2” to 8” mold) ...........D2434 .......................... 300.00/Test Permeability (rigid wall - constant head pressure, 12” mold) ..................D2434 .......................... 460.00/Test Permeability (additional consolidation stresses) ............................................................................ 95.00/stage Permeability (air) ......................................................................................D6539 .......................... 325.00/Test Pinhole Dispersion Test; 4 increments (remold sample) ..........................D4647 .......................... 400.00/Test Resistance Value .......................................................................................D2844 .......................... 210.00/Test Resistance Value – Lime or Cement Treated ............................................D2844/CA301 .............. 260.00/Test Resistivity & pH Test .................................................................................Cal 532 or 643 ............... 90.00/Test Sand Equivalent ........................................................................................Caltrans 217/D2419....... 75.00/Test Soil pH .......................................................................................................D4972 ............................ 20.00/Test Specific Gravity - Fine-Grained Soils .........................................................D854 .............................. 75.00/Test Sulfate Content ................................................................................................................................ 50.00/Test <continued on next page> SOIL TESTING (continued) TEST METHOD UNIT RATE Triaxial Compression Test (CD) .................................................................D7181 ......................... 575.00/Point Triaxial Compression Test (CU with pore pressure) ..................................D4767 ......................... 425.00/Point Triaxial Compression Test (UU).................................................................D2850 .......................... 125.00/Test Triaxial Compression Test [Stage (Progressive) Test; CU] .........................D4767 ......................... 1,000.00/Set Unconfined Compression Test (undisturbed sample) ..............................D2166 ............................ 90.00/Test Unit Dry Weight and Moisture Content (undisturbed sample) ................D7263/D2216 ................ 22.00/Test All test methods are ASTM unless otherwise noted. Special sample preparation and laboratory testing not listed above will be charged at applicable personnel rates. All laboratory test rates are for standard turn-around time and normal reporting procedures. Rush orders will be subject to a 25 percent premium. Manpower requirements or test protocol may preclude the granting of a rush request. FRESNO COUNTY 2019 & 2020 FEE SCHEDULE AGGREGATE TESTING TEST METHOD UNIT RATE Clay Lumps and Friable Particles ..............................................................C142 ............................ $80.00/Test Crushed Particles (Fractured Faces) ................................................................................................ 95.00/Test Durability Index – Fine ..............................................................................D3744 .......................... 120.00/Test Durability Index – Coarse ..........................................................................D3744 .......................... 140.00/Test Flat and Elongated Particles .....................................................................CRD119, 120 ................ 105.00/Test Injurious Organic Matter ..........................................................................C40 ................................ 60.00/Test Insoluble Residue in Carbonate Aggregates .............................................D3042 .......................... 275.00/Test Lightweight Pieces in Aggregate ...............................................................C123 .............................. 95.00/Test Los Angeles Abrasion Test (500 revolutions) ............................................C131 ............................ 160.00/Test Los Angeles Abrasion Test (1000 revolutions) ..........................................C535 ............................ 180.00/Test Mechanical Analysis - Sand or Gravel (dry sieve) .....................................C136 .............................. 70.00/Test Mechanical Analysis (wash 200 sieve) ......................................................C117 .............................. 65.00/Test Mechanical Analysis (fine with wash 200 sieve) .......................................C136 ............................ 100.00/Test Rapid Determination of Carbonate Content of Rock ................................4373............................. 120.00/Test Sample Crushing ............................................................................................................................. 85.00/Hour Sand Equivalent ........................................................................................D2419 ............................ 75.00/Test Specific Gravity, Bulk, SSD with Absorption .............................................C128/C127 ................... 110.00 Each Sulfate Soundness, per sieve size .............................................................C88 .............................. 135.00/Test ROCK TESTING TEST METHOD UNIT RATE Density ......................................................................................................D7263 .......................... $35.00/Test Density, Porosity, Specific Gravity, Water Content ....................................................................... 110.00/Test Indirect Tensile Strength (Brazilian), Single Break ....................................D3967 ............................ 55.00/Test Indirect Tensile Strength (Brazilian), 10-15 Breaks ...................................D3967 .......................... 210.00/Test Point Load Index, Single Break .................................................................D5731 ............................ 35.00/Test Point Load Index, 10-15 Breaks ................................................................D5731 .......................... 180.00/Test Rip-Rap (wet / dry, 10 cycles) ...................................................................D5318 ....................... 1,000.00/Test Rip-Rap (freeze / thaw, 10 cycles) ............................................................D5312 .......................... 800.00/Test Rip-Rap (specific gravity) ..........................................................................D6473 .......................... 110.00/Test Rip-Rap Soundness (sodium) ....................................................................D5240 .......................... 400.00/Test Rock Joint Direct Shear ................................................................................................................. 260.00/Point Rock Joint Direct Shear, additional normal load ............................................................................. 95.00/Test Slake Durability .........................................................................................D4644 .......................... 200.00/Test Triaxial Compression, with Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio ................................................ 495.00/point Uniaxial Strength (peak only; 2.5” maximum) ..........................................D7012 .......................... 130.00/Test Uniaxial Strength (with stress-strain curve)................................................................................. call for quote Uniaxial Strength (with stress-strain curve, add modulus and Poisson ratio) ............................. call for quote Rock preparation, cutting, and grinding ......................................................................................... 85.00/Hour All test methods are ASTM unless otherwise noted. Special sample preparation and laboratory testing not listed above will be charged at applicable personnel rates. All laboratory test rates are for standard turn-around time and normal reporting procedures. Rush orders will be subject to a 25 percent premium. Manpower requirements or test protocol may preclude the granting of a rush request. FRESNO COUNTY 2019 & 2020 FEE SCHEDULE GEOSYNTHETIC MATERIALS TEST METHOD UNIT RATE Seam Coupon Series (thickness, peel, and shear) Set of 5 each (Quantity 1-10) ....................................................................D6392 .......................... $75.00/Test Set of 5 each (Quantity 10 or more) .........................................................D6392 ............................ 55.00/Test Asperity Height .........................................................................................GRI GM12 ...................... 35.00/Test Liner Puncture Testing up to 350 psi ............................................................................................. 260.00/Test Liner Puncture Testing over 350 psi .............................................................................................. 410.00/Test Large Scale Direct Shear (ASTM D5321 and D6321) Geosynthetic vs Geosynthetic – Method A .................................................................................. 210.00/Point Soil vs Geosynthetic Friction – Method B ..................................................................................... 260.00/Point GCL Internal Shear ............................................................................................................... 310.00/Point Shear Speed (<0.04) ............................................................................................................. 110.00/Point (Shear rate dependent on soil drainage characteristics and engineering specifications) Substrate Remolding Fee ........................................................................................................ 60.00/Test Additional Saturation Time (>24 hours) .................................................................................. 60.00/Day GCL Testing Index Flux Testing .....................................................................................D5887 .......................... 270.00/Test Fluid Loss ..................................................................................................D5891 ............................ 75.00/Test Swell Index ................................................................................................D5890 ............................ 70.00/Test Mass per Unit Area ...................................................................................D5993 ....................... 70.00/Sample Custom Liner Testing ................................................................................................................... call for quote All test methods are ASTM unless otherwise noted. Special sample preparation and laboratory testing not listed above will be charged at applicable personnel rates. All laboratory test rates are for standard turn-around time and normal reporting procedures. Rush orders will be subject to a 25 percent premium. Manpower requirements or test protocol may preclude the granting of a rush request.